A land use appeal hearing was held to determine if a pool structure meets the height and setback requirements as outlined in the city code. The appellants, Codruta Boggs and Gary Laney, argued that the city's decision to allow the structure was arbitrary, capricious, and illegal. The city's attorney, Steve Doxey, countered that the decision was not arbitrary, capricious, or illegal, and that the structure must comply with the ordinance as it was written at the time of approval.
Details
Summary
A land use appeal hearing was held to determine if a pool structure meets the height and setback requirements as outlined in the city code. The appellants, Codruta Boggs and Gary Laney, argued that the city's decision to allow the structure was arbitrary, capricious, and illegal. The city's attorney, Steve Doxey, countered that the decision was not arbitrary, capricious, or illegal, and that the structure must comply with the ordinance as it was written at the time of approval.