[PAGE 1]
Richfield City Council Agenda
March 10, 2026 -- 7:00 PM
Richfield Municipal Center
Council Chambers
6700 Portland Avenue South
1. Call to Order
2. Pledge of Allegiance
3. Approval of the Agenda
4. Approval of Minutes
a. Meeting Minutes from (1) City Council Work Session from February 17, (2) City Council
Work Session from February 24, 2026, and (3) Regular City Council Meeting from
February 24, 2026.
5. Open Forum
Participants can share their comments in person, by voicemail, or email, and may also request to
participate virtually. For more information on submitting comments, refer to the Council Agenda and
Minutes page on richfieldmn.gov/citycouncil
6. Proclamations and Presentations
a. Proclamation celebrating Women's History Month
7. Consent Calendar
Consent Calendar contains several separate items, which are acted upon by the City Council in one
motion. Once the Consent Calendar has been approved, the individual items and recommended
actions have also been approved. No further Council action on these items is necessary. However,
any Council Member may request that an item be removed from the Consent Calendar and placed
on the regular agenda for Council discussion and action. All items listed on the Consent Calendar
are recommended for approval.
a. Approve Disbursements/Claims
b. Consider approval of a resolution authorizing staff to accept a Hennepin County
Lifeguard Services Grant in the amount of $50,000 to assist with funding the hiring and
retention of lifeguard staff at the Richfield Outdoor Pool, and authorizing staff to enter
into the grant agreement and execute the funds as prescribed.
c. Consider the approval of a resolution authorizing City of Richfield Recreation Services
Director Karl Huemiller to submit a Minnesota Department of Natural Resources
Outdoor Recreation Grant in the amount of $500,000 for the Veterans Park Improvement
Project on behalf of the City of Richfield, and is authorized to execute such agreements
as necessary to implement the project.
d. Consider approval of a resolution authorizing staff to enter into a Source Water
Protection Grant Agreement with the Minnesota Department of Health for a grant in the
amount of $11,208.26 to be used in support of Richfield's Cross Connection and
Backflow Prevention Program.
8. Consideration of Items, if Any Removed From Consent Calendar
9. Public Hearings
10. Proposed Ordinances
11. Resolutions
a. Labor Agreement with The International Association of Firefighters, Local 1215
(firefighters, lieutenants, and captains) for 2026-2027.
b. Consider a resolution of support for Metro Transit's recommendation to route the K
Line Bus Rapid Transit line on Nicollet Avenue through Richfield.
c. Consider approval of a resolution authorizing the Mayor and City Manager to execute a
Memorandum of Understanding with MnDOT related to future improvements at the 76th
Street and I-35W interchange.
d. Consider a resolution approving the project layout and providing Municipal Consent for
Phase 2 of the I-494 Corridor Vision Project and repealing Resolution No. 12397.
12. Other Business
a. Consider approval of allocation of awards and agreements for services with the
Page 1 of 83

[PAGE 2]
recommended non-profit organizations and authorize the Mayor and City Manager to
execute agreements for services between the City of Richfield and the non-profit
organizations.
b. Consideration of alternate appointment to fill vacancy on Advisory Board of Health.
13. City Manager’s Report
14. Council Discussion
a. Hats off to Hometown Hits
b. Council Liaison Reports
15. Adjournment
Auxiliary aids for individuals with disabilities are available upon request. Requests must be made at least 96 hours in advance to the
City Clerk at 612-861-9739.
Includes Materials - Materials relating to these agenda items can be found in the Council Chambers Agenda Packet book located by
the entrance. The complete Council Agenda Packet is available electronically on the City of Richfield website.
Page 2 of 83

[PAGE 3]
CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
Richfield, Minnesota
City Council Work Session
February 17, 2026
ITEM #1 CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Supple called the work session to order at 5:45 p.m. in the Council Chambers.
Council Present: Mary Supple, Mayor; Walter Burk, Sean Hayford Oleary, Rori A. Coleman-
Woods.
Remote Access: Council Member Christensen participated remotely via interactive technology
for an excused medical reason.
Staff Present: Katie Rodriguez, City Manager; Melissa Poehlman, Community
Development Director; Julie Urban, Assistant Community Development
Director; and Michelle Friedrich, City Clerk.
ITEM #2 ITEM DISCUSSION
a. Discussion of a draft Emergency Pre-Eviction Notice Ordinance.
Community Development Director Poehlman presented the draft emergency ordinance extending the
pre-eviction notice period for nonpayment of rent from 14 to 30 days due to income disruptions from
Operation Metro Surge. Community Development Director Poehlman noted the emergency pre-
eviction notice ordinance preserves evictions for non-financial reasons and maintains existing
enforcement policies. Staff expressed support for the temporary measure, noting potential impacts on
both tenants and landlords. Community Development Director noted preliminary landlord feedback
was mixed with concerns about shifting financial burdens and accumulating tenant debt. Community
Development Director Poehlman reported $12,000 of the $50,000 allocation to VEAP of rental
assistance funds have been distributed with additional monetary donations raised by community
support.
Council voiced general support for the emergency ordinance and provided staff direction.
ITEM #3 ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Supple adjourned the work session at 5:51 p.m.
Page 3 of 83

[PAGE 4]
City Council Work Session Minutes -2- February 17, 2026
Date Approved: March 10, 2026
Mary B. Supple
Mayor
Michelle Friedrich Katie Rodriguez
City Clerk City Manager
Page 4 of 83

[PAGE 5]
CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
Richfield, Minnesota
City Council Work Session
February 24, 2026
ITEM #1 CALL TO ORDER
Mayor Supple called the work session to order at 5:30 p.m. in the Bartholomew Room.
Council Present: Mary Supple, Mayor; Walter Burk, Sean Hayford Oleary, Rori A. Coleman-
Woods.
Remote Access: Council Member Christensen participated remotely via interactive technology
for an excused medical reason.
Staff Present: Katie Rodriguez, City Manager; Karl Huemiller, Recreation Director; Jill
Murphy, Recreation Program Manager; Kris Wieby, Facilities/Program
Manager; Rachel Lindholm, Recreation Coordinator; Courtney DesCamps,
Senior Analyst; and Michelle Friedrich, City Clerk.
Guests: Will Forbord, Loeffler Construction; Edie Sebesta, U+B Architects; and
Chuck Evans, Damon Farber Landscape Architects.
ITEM #2 ITEM DISCUSSION
a. Climate Action Plan (CAP)
Recreation Coordinator Lindholm presented an overview of the updated Climate Action Plan, and
noted the plan adopts state emission reduction goals, aligns with the Comprehensive Plan, and
introduces new elements including a “climate snapshot” highlighting local climate trends, a
vulnerability assessment identifying disproportionately affected populations, and two new goals
focused on public health/emergency preparedness and strengthening internal city capacity.
Council and staff discussion included concerns about LED streetlight brightness and color
temperature, with staff coordinating with Public Works on options, and questions about how
sustainability efforts are being incorporated into projects such as Wood Lake, Veterans Park, and the
future community center, with staff confirming ongoing integration of Climate Action Plan goals into
those initiatives.
Council discussed further integrating natural resource and sustainability goals into city planning,
including connections between the Climate Action Plan, Comprehensive Plan, and Parks Master Plan,
as well as tree canopy expansion and building retrofits. Staff confirmed the updated plan will guide
future planning efforts and retain a five-year blueprint with both continued and new actions. Council
supported moving the Climate Action Plan forward for approval.
Page 5 of 83

[PAGE 6]
City Council Work Session Minutes -2- February 24, 2026
b. Veteran’s Park Improvements
Recreation Director Huemiller presented the Vision Plan phased improvements to enhance Veteran’s
Park accessibility, sustainability, and overall user experience. Key updates include creating a clearer
1.5-mile primary loop trail that is ADA-accessible and multi-use, consolidating redundant paved paths,
improving neighborhood connections, and shifting portions of the trail closer to the water and farther
from residential areas. The Veterans Memorial will be better integrated into the park through looped
trail alignment and surrounding native prairie plantings. Turf areas will be reduced and converted to
native prairie to improve environmental sustainability, with an initial intensive maintenance period
followed by lower long-term upkeep. A wildlife viewing platform is proposed as a cost-effective
alternative to replacing the former floating boardwalk, alongside habitat restoration to enhance
visibility and birdwatching opportunities.
Council and staff reviewed additional priorities that include establishing a new Memorial Garden near
the bandshell as a peaceful community remembrance space, with initial infrastructure installed as
funding allows. Staff noted the pavilion area will be reorganized to improve flow and functionality
during events, including crushed stone surfacing to support vendors, added overstory shade trees,
and clearer vehicle access controls. Building repairs to the golf structure and other targeted
improvements are also included. Council and staff reviewed light levels, trail surfaces and
experiences, accessibility, and the wildlife viewing platform. Council noted including a long-term plan
for arena lighting. Staff and Council reviewed other future priorities include mini-golf restroom
updates, and repairs to arena cedar soffits, fascia, and board installation.
Staff reviewed cost estimates of targeted improvements, by priority order, and noted implementation
will be guided by identified priorities and available funding. Council expressed general support for the
plan’s focus on accessibility, sustainability, connectivity, and thoughtful integration of trails and
gathering and memorial spaces.
ITEM #3 ADJOURNMENT
Mayor Supple adjourned the work session at 6:54 p.m.
Date Approved: March 10, 2026
Mary B. Supple
Mayor
Michelle Friedrich Katie Rodriguez
City Clerk City Manager
Page 6 of 83

[PAGE 7]
CITY COUNCIL MEETING MINUTES
Richfield, Minnesota
Council Regular Meeting
February 24, 2026
ITEM #1 CALL TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order by Mayor Supple at 7:06 p.m. on February 24, 2026, in the Council
Chambers.
Council Present: Mary Supple, Mayor; Walter Burk, Sean Hayford Oleary, Rori A.
Coleman-Woods
Remote Access: Council Member Christensen participated remotely via
interactive technology for an excused medical reason.
Staff Present: Katie Rodriguez, City Manager; Joe Powers, City Attorney:
Mary Tietjen, City Attorney; and Michelle Friedrich, City Clerk.
Guests: None.
ITEM #2 PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
Mayor Supple led the Pledge of Allegiance.
ITEM #3 APPROVAL OF AGENDA
MOTION: made by Council Member Hayford Oleary, seconded by Council Member Coleman-
Woods to approve the agenda as presented.
Voting Aye: Mayor Supple, Council Member Burk, Council Member Hayford Oleary, Council
Member Christensen (remote), and Council Member Coleman-Woods.
Motion carried: 5-0
ITEM #4 APPROVAL OF MINUTES
MOTION: made by Council Member Burk, seconded by Council Member Hayford Oleary to
approve the minutes of the (1) City Council Work Session from February 10, 2026, and (2) City
Council Regular Meeting from February 10, 2026.
Voting Aye: Mayor Supple, Council Member Burk, Council Member Hayford Oleary, Council
Member Christensen (remote), and Council Member Coleman-Woods.
Motion carried: 5-0
Page 7 of 83

[PAGE 8]
City Council Meeting Minutes -2- February 24, 2026
ITEM #5 OPEN FORUM
Mayor Supple noted the individuals wishing to speak during Open Forum and reviewed the three-
minute time limit for public comments and explained the use of time warning cards to alert the
speaker when their time is almost expired. Attendees were reminded to listen respectfully to all
speakers. Instructions were given for speakers to state their name and city of residence before
speaking.
Six residents addressed the Council during the Open Forum opportunity.
Birgit Johnson, Richfield resident, expressed concern about current immigration enforcement
tactics. Ms. Johnson noted she does not oppose immigration enforcement, but disagrees with
immigration and customs enforcement’s harsh methods and a lack of accountability.
Jacob Poppe, Richfield resident, voiced concern regarding automated license plate readers
(ALPRs) in the community. Mr. Poppe opined that ALPR cameras threaten privacy by continuously
tracking movements without warrants or probable cause. Mr. Poppe urged the City Council to
remove the installed FLOCK cameras, end the FLOCK contract, and prevent future ALPR use in
Richfield.
Erica Klein, Richfield resident, proposed a temporary towing moratorium to protect families who,
due to fear of immigration enforcement, cannot access or move their cars, highlighting existing
flexibility in street parking enforcement.
Nick Trautner, Richfield resident, opined that laws only work when people have faith in them,
criticized police for failing to protect the community from immigration and customs enforcement
during Operation Metro Surge, and warned that without accountability, residents feel compelled to
protect themselves, questioning the police’s role and purpose.
Scott Dahlquist, Richfield resident, veteran, and retired officer criticized harsh ICE enforcement,
highlighted its harm to residents, and urged federal reforms to expand legal immigration and
citizenship pathways while upholding America’s founding principles of equality and rights.
Ginny Morin, Richfield resident, asked the Council to stop funding economic losses from ICE
operations, arguing that business closures and other impacts are consequences of civil
disobedience or illegal actions. Ms. Morin emphasized that individuals make choices and must face
the results, and that city funds should not cover these losses for residents or businesses.
Ava McKnight, Richfield resident, raised concerns about excessive lighting in Richfield, citing public
health impacts, safety hazards from blinding lights, and environmental effects on wildlife. Ms.
McKnight noted issues at Vets Park, the ice arena, community gardens, and a public works
building, emphasizing the negative effects on residents and the surrounding environment.
ITEM #6 PROCLAMATIONS AND PRESENTATIONS
a. Proclamation Celebrating Black History Month.
Mayor Supple read the proclamation and presented to Michael Zazzara, Human Rights
Commission.
Page 8 of 83

[PAGE 9]
City Council Meeting Minutes -3- February 24, 2026
ITEM #7 CONSENT CALENDAR
City Manager Rodriguez presented the consent calendar.
a. Approve Disbursements/Claims
U.S. BANK 2-13-2026
A/P Checks/ETF’s: (1/31/2026- thru 2/13/2026) $4,696,284.35
Payroll (2/13/2026) $1,036,473.80
TOTAL $5,732,758.15
b. Consider the approval of engineering consultant pool agreements between the City and
the selected engineering firms for routine professional engineering services for calendar
years 2026 through 2030.
c. Consider an Emergency Ordinance to temporarily extend Pre-eviction Notice
requirements.
BILL NO. 2026-04
EMERGENCY ORDINANCE TO TEMPORARILY EXTEND PRE-EVICTION NOTICE
REQUIREMENTS
MOTION: made by Council Member Coleman-Woods, seconded by Council Member Burk to
approve consent calendar items 7a-c as presented.
Voting Aye: Mayor Supple, Council Member Burk, Council Member Hayford Oleary, Council
Member Christensen (remote), and Council Member Coleman-Woods.
Motion carried: 5-0
CONSIDERATION OF ITEMS, IF ANY, REMOVED FROM CONSENT
ITEM #8
CALENDAR
None.
ITEM #9 PUBLIC HEARINGS
None.
ITEM #10 PROPOSED ORDINANCES
None.
ITEM #11 RESOLUTIONS
None.
Page 9 of 83

[PAGE 10]
City Council Meeting Minutes -4- February 24, 2026
ITEM #12 OTHER BUSINESS
None.
ITEM #13 CITY MANAGER’S REPORT
City Manager Rodriguez reported on public feedback from the last council meeting, noting updates
to police dispatch procedures for federal agent interactions and continued rental assistance
coordination with VEAP.
City Manager Rodriguez noted the Transportation Commission submitted the following
recommendation to the City Council to consider:
Directly in response to Operation Metro Surge, the Transportation Commission recommended to
City Council to cease the impoundment of abandoned vehicles, excluding instances where the
vehicle poses a threat to public safety, and that the City does not issue associated City fines for the
impoundment of the vehicle. If fees must be assigned, the Commission recommends the
opportunity for fees to be retroactively waived should proof of detainment resulting in the
abandonment of the vehicle be provided.
City Manager Rodriguez shared that relaxing the city’s enforcement of abandoned vehicles is likely
to have unintended consequences as one of the most common code complaints is illegally parked
vehicles. However, cars may be left in a legal parking space, including on the street, for 48 hours.
In addition, Public Safety staff have confirmed with the city’s towing contractor that if vehicle
owners can submit proof that the car was abandoned as the result of immigration enforcement,
they will only be charged for the towing fee and 1 day’s storage.
City Manager Rodriguez proposed a social services contract with the Richfield Leadership Network
(RLN) for an initial amount of $5,000, to be increased to a maximum of $10,000 if needed, to
reimburse Richfield residents for towing and impound fees related to immigration enforcement. The
City Council directed staff to bring back a draft agreement at a future meeting.
ITEM #14 COUNCIL DISCUSSION
a. Hats off to Hometown Hits.
Council Member Christensen noted the hometown guide, released this spring, is well-organized
and highlights numerous social activities and events for community involvement starting next
month.
Council Member Coleman-Woods thanked the City of Richfield and the community for their support
following the death of her father-in-law, Pastor James Willie Woods, highlighting his journey from
Mississippi, his sacrifices, faith, and the legacy he instilled in his family.
Mayor Supple thanked Margaret Perez and host Armando for their outreach efforts and referenced
an interview with La Raza Radio and thanked the League of Women Voters. Mayor Supple noted
collaboration with local business owners, and highlighted ongoing participation in “Cities for Safe
and Stable Communities,” including recent meetings with Senator Smith, and upcoming
discussions with Governor Walz.
Page 10 of 83

[PAGE 11]
City Council Meeting Minutes -5- February 24, 2026
b. Council Liaison Reports
None.
ITEM #15 ADJOURNMENT
MOTION: made by Council Member Hayford Oleary seconded by Council Member Burk to adjourn
the meeting at 7:45 p.m.
Voting Aye: Mayor Supple, Council Member Burk, Council Member Hayford Oleary, Council
Member Christensen (remote), and Council Member Coleman-Woods.
Motion carried: 5-0
Date Approved: March 10, 2026
Mary Supple
Mayor
Michelle Friedrich Katie Rodriguez
City Clerk City Manager
Page 11 of 83

[PAGE 18]
Proclamation of the City of Richfield
WHEREAS, Women’s History Month is for celebrating the achievements of all women; including
women of color, women of the LGBTQIA2S+ community, women of all abilities, and women of all
religions; and
WHEREAS, women of the Indigenous Nation of the Dakota Peoples have lived on this land now
known as the City of Richfield, for thousands of years; and
WHEREAS, President Jimmy Carter declared the week of March 7th Women’s History Week and
later the United States Congress declared March Women’s History Month in 1987; and
WHEREAS, women have served courageously throughout our history in all aspects of our
society, and deserve to be recognized and respected for all their contributions; and
WHEREAS, the City of Richfield was honored to have the first Latina Mayor Maria Regan
Gonzalez, in the state of Minnesota; and
WHEREAS, the City has a number of women representing the first in their department - Kristin
Asher is the first woman Public Works Director, Melissa Poehlman is the first woman Community
Development Director and Jenell Brooks is the first woman Fire Chief of the City of Richfield; and
WHEREAS, Edwina Garcia, former Richfield council member, served as the first Hispanic woman
in the Minnesota State House of Representatives; and
WHEREAS, Debbie Goettel was the first woman mayor of the City of Richfield; and
WHEREAS, The City of Richfield is in Minnesota’s 5th congressional district and is represented by
the first Somali Congresswoman, Ilhan Omar; and
WHEREAS, The City of Richfield affirms its commitment to supporting and uplifting women of all
races, abilities, and religions to ensure a better future for all members of our community.
NOW, THEREFORE, I, MARY B. SUPPLE, Mayor of the City of Richfield, do proclaim the month of
March 2026 as Women’s History Month in the City of Richfield and call on the people of Richfield to
observe this month with appropriate programs, activities, and ceremonies, and continue to honor the
contributions of Women Americans throughout year.
PROCLAIMED this 10th day of March, 2026.
_____________________________________
Mary B. Supple, Mayor
Page 12 of 83

[PAGE 19]
City Council Meeting 3/10/2026
Agenda Section: Consent Calendar
Agenda Item: 7.b.
Report Prepared By:
John Evans, Analyst
Department Director:
Karl Huemiller, Recreation Director
Item for Consideration:
Consider approval of a resolution authorizing staff to accept a Hennepin County
Lifeguard Services Grant in the amount of $50,000 to assist with funding the
hiring and retention of lifeguard staff at the Richfield Outdoor Pool, and
authorizing staff to enter into the grant agreement and execute the funds as
prescribed.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Richfield Outdoor Pool has a primary mission to provide state-of-the-art services for
the community. In pursuit of this, Richfield Recreation Services applied for, and was
awarded, a Hennepin County Lifeguard Services Grant in the amount of $50,000 to
assist with the hiring and retention of lifeguards at the Richfield Pool. The grant assists
with providing competitive wages and financial incentives to encourage retention of
summer staff for the entire season. With Council approval, staff will enter into the grant
agreement and execute the funds as prescribed by Hennepin County.
RECOMMENDED ACTION
BY MOTION: Approve the resolution authorizing staff to accept a Hennepin
County Lifeguard Services Grant in the amount of $50,000 to assist with the
hiring and retention of lifeguard staff at the Richfield Outdoor Pool, and
authorizing staff to enter into the grant agreement and execute the funds as
prescribed by Hennepin County.
HISTORICAL CONTEXT
Richfield has received the Hennepin County Lifeguard Services Grant in the past, which
has been crucial to hiring and retaining lifeguards at the Richfield Outdoor Pool, helping
to fund competitive wages and bonuses for lifeguards who remain on duty for the full
season. To accept and process the grant, Richfield City Council must approve the
attached resolution.
EQUITABLE OR STRATEGIC CONSIDERATIONS OR IMPACTS
Equity: This grant will allow the City to provide a full season of service at the Richfield
Pool by helping to ensure a full staff of lifeguard personnel. The success of the Richfield
Pool depends on the hiring and retention of this crucial staff.
Strategic: This grant helps to meet the strategic priority of equity and inclusion by
offering the use of this facility for use to all people, including traditionally excluded
groups.
Page 13 of 83

[PAGE 20]
POLICIES (RESOLUTIONS, ORDINANCES, REGULATIONS, STATUTES, ETC.)
City Council approval is required for the acceptance of the grant, as well as the
authorization of staff to proceed with the grant agreement and execution.
CRITICAL TIMING ISSUES
In order to ensure a full and successful pool season, City Council approval of the
resolution is required at this meeting.
FINANCIAL IMPACT
The grant will assist with the wages and retention incentive bonuses that make hiring a
full complement of lifeguards possible at the Richfield Pool.
LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS
None
ALTERNATIVE RECOMMENDATION(S)
ATTACHMENTS
1. 2026-03-10 Henn Co Lifeguard Grant Acceptance
Page 14 of 83

[PAGE 21]
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING STAFF TO ACCEPT A HENNEPIN COUNTY LIFEGUARD
SERVICES GRANT IN THE AMOUNT OF $50,000, AWARDED TO RICHFIELD RECREATION
SERVICES TO FUND THE RECRUITMENT AND HIRING OF LIFEGUARDS AT THE RICHFIELD
OUTDOOR POOL, AND ENTER INTO THE GRANT AGREEMENT AND EXECUTE THE FUNDS
AS PRESCRIBED BY HENNEPIN COUNTY.
WHEREAS, Hennepin County, via the Hennepin Youth Grants Program, has awarded the
City of Richfield with a $50,000 grant to assist with the hiring and retention of youth lifeguards; and
WHEREAS, Richfield Recreation is beginning the recruitment of lifeguards for the Richfield
Outdoor Pool season and is ready to accept the grant and proceed with staffing efforts to ensure a
full and successful pool season; and
WHEREAS, Minnesota Statute 465.03 reads in part as follows:
Any city, county, school district or town may accept a grant or devise of real or personal
property and maintain such property for the benefit of its citizens in accordance with the
terms prescribed by the donor. Nothing herein shall authorize such acceptance or use for
religious or sectarian purposes. Every acceptance shall be by resolution of the council
adopted by two-thirds majority of its members, expressing such terms in full.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of Richfield,
Minnesota, that Recreation Services staff is hereby authorized to accept a Hennepin County
Lifeguard Services grant in the amount of $50,000 to fund the recruitment and hiring of lifeguards
at the Richfield Outdoor Pool, and enter into the grant agreement and execute the funds as
prescribed by Hennepin County.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 10th day of March,
2026.
Mary Supple, Mayor
ATTEST:
Michelle Friedrich, City Clerk
2026-3-10 Lifeguard Services Grant Acceptance
Page 15 of 83

[PAGE 22]
City Council Meeting 3/10/2026
Agenda Section: Consent Calendar
Agenda Item: 7.c.
Report Prepared By:
John Evans, Analyst
Department Director:
Karl Huemiller, Recreation Director
Item for Consideration:
Consider the approval of a resolution authorizing City of Richfield Recreation
Services Director Karl Huemiller to submit a Minnesota Department of Natural
Resources Outdoor Recreation Grant in the amount of $500,000 for the Veterans
Park Improvement Project on behalf of the City of Richfield, and is authorized to
execute such agreements as necessary to implement the project.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Consistent with City Council direction and with the authorization of a Local Option Sales
Tax for a park project at Veterans Memorial Park, staff has developed design and
construction plans for the improvement of facilities at Veterans Memorial Park.
The City of Richfield may apply for a Minnesota Department of Natural Resources
Outdoor Recreation Grant and is eligible to receive this grant with matching funds from
the Local Sales Tax General Obligation Bonds. The funding request from this grant will
be $500,000.
To apply for the Outdoor Recreation Grant, the City Council must approve a resolution
authorizing the Recreation Services Director to act on behalf of the City of Richfield to
submit the application and process any pertinent grant agreements, if approved.
RECOMMENDED ACTION
By Motion: Approve the resolution authorizing City of Richfield Recreation
Services Director Karl Huemiller to submit a Minnesota Department of Natural
Resources Outdoor Recreation Grant for the Veterans Park Improvement Project
on behalf of the City of Richfield, and is authorized to execute such agreements
as necessary to implement the project.
HISTORICAL CONTEXT
In the General Election of November 5, 2024, Richfield voters approved the issuance of
a local sales tax to fund three parks and recreation capital improvement projects: a new
building at Wood Lake Nature Center, improvements to the facilities of Veterans
Memorial Park, and a new Richfield Community Center building. The bonds to be used
to fund the Veterans Park Project have been issued and expenses have been incurred.
While the funding from these bonds will be sufficient for the planned improvements, a
matching grant from the Department of Natural Resources will provide funds to enable
staff to consider many alternate and additional enhancements for the project.
Page 16 of 83

[PAGE 23]
Staff is working with WSB Engineering to develop all of the necessary documents and
materials for the grant application and has begun work with Loeffler Construction and
JLG Architects to manage the work and develop a project overview.
EQUITABLE OR STRATEGIC CONSIDERATIONS OR IMPACTS
The Veterans Memorial Park project will ensure the future viability of the infrastructure
at Veterans Memorial Park, including the Outdoor Pool, Ice Arena, picnic pavilion, and
walking trails. Providing these facilities to the public is crucial to the mission of the
Recreation Services Department and the City of Richfield to serve all of its residents.
POLICIES (RESOLUTIONS, ORDINANCES, REGULATIONS, STATUTES, ETC.)
• The Veterans Memorial Park project is identified in the City's capital improvement
plan.
• The reimbursement resolution is standard procedure and necessary to apply for
the Outdoor Recreation Grant.
CRITICAL TIMING ISSUES
In order to submit the application by the deadline defined by the Department of Natural
Resources, approval of the resolution is required at this meeting.
FINANCIAL IMPACT
Adoption of the proposed resolution provides funding for the Veterans Memorial Park
Project beyond the proceeds from the General Obligation Bonds and leverages this
existing funding source to optimize the project and consider alternative options that will
broaden and improve the scope of many aspects of the project.
LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS
The City Attorney has reviewed the resolution and will be available to answer questions.
ALTERNATIVE RECOMMENDATION(S)
None
ATTACHMENTS
1. 2026-03-10 MN DNR Grant Application-Vets Park
Page 17 of 83

[PAGE 24]
RESOLUTION NO. ____
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING CITY OF RICHFIELD RECREATION SERVICES DIRECTOR
KARL HUEMILLER TO SUBMIT A MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES
OUTDOOR RECREATION GRANT APPLICATION IN THE AMOUNT OF $500,000 FOR THE
VETERANS PARK IMPROVEMENT PROJECT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF RICHFIELD,
AND IS AUTHORIZED TO EXECUTE SUCH AGREEMENTS AS NECESSARY TO
IMPLEMENT THE PROJECT.
WHEREAS, the City of Richfield (hereby known as “the Applicant”) will act as legal
sponsor for the Veterans Park Improvement Project (hereby known as “the project”) contained in
the Outdoor Recreation Grant application to be submitted in March 2026 and that the Richfield
Recreation Services Director is hereby authorized to apply to the Department of Natural
Resources for funding of this project on behalf of Applicant; and
WHEREAS, the Applicant maintains an adequate Conflict of Interest Policy and,
throughout the term of the contract, will monitor and report any actual or potential conflicts of
interest to the State, upon discovery; and
WHEREAS, the Applicant has the legal authority to apply for financial assistance, and it
has the financial capability to meet the match requirement (if any) and ensure adequate
construction, operation, maintenance and replacement of the proposed project for its design life;
and
WHEREAS, the Applicant has not incurred any development costs and has not entered
into a written purchase agreement to acquire the property described in the Cost Breakdown
section on this application; and
WHEREAS, the Applicant has fee title or permanent easement over all the land described
in the boundary map or recreational site plan included in the grant application; and
WHEREAS, that, upon approval of its application by the State, the Applicant may enter
into an agreement with the State for the above-referenced project, and that the Applicant certifies
that it will comply with all applicable laws and regulations as stated in the grant agreement
including dedicating the park property for uses consistent with the funding grant program into
perpetuity.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Recreation Services Director is hereby
authorized to execute such agreements as necessary to implement the project on behalf of the
applicant.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 10th day of March,
2026.
Mary Supple, Mayor
ATTEST:
Michelle Friedrich, City Clerk
2026-03-10 MN DNR Grant Application-Vets Park
Page 18 of 83

[PAGE 25]
City Council Meeting 3/10/2026
Agenda Section: Consent Calendar
Agenda Item: 7.d.
Report Prepared By:
Mattias Oddsson, Water Resources Engineer
Department Director:
Kristin Asher, Public Works Director
Item for Consideration:
Consider approval of a resolution authorizing staff to enter into a Source Water
Protection Grant Agreement with the Minnesota Department of Health for a grant
in the amount of $11,208.26 to be used in support of Richfield's Cross Connection
and Backflow Prevention Program.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Backflow occurs when the pressure of a polluted source exceeds that of the potable
water supply. This situation can result in contaminants, including hazardous chemicals
and bacteria, mixing with potable water. Cross connections—an actual or potential
connection between a potable and non-potable water supply—are sources of backflow
problems. In 2025, Richfield partnered with HydroCorp LLC to launch a backflow and
cross connection prevention program, including compliance inspections of sites with
potential cross connections and a public relations program. In late 2025, staff applied for
a competitive Source Water Protection grant through MDH to help support backflow and
cross connection prevention work. MDH provided notice in February 2026 that the grant
application was successful.
RECOMMENDED ACTION
By Motion: Approve a resolution authorizing staff to enter into a Source Water
Protection Grant Agreement with the Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) for a
grant in the amount of $11,208.26 to be used in support of Richfield's Cross
Connection and Backflow Prevention Program.
HISTORICAL CONTEXT
Richfield has previously received several grants from the MDH Source Water Protection
Program. These grants have helped support work such as sealing high-risk wells and
conducting outreach to properties with potential sources of groundwater contamination.
EQUITABLE OR STRATEGIC CONSIDERATIONS OR IMPACTS
Acceptance of this grant supports the strategic plan priorities of operational excellence
and sustainable infrastructure.
POLICIES (RESOLUTIONS, ORDINANCES, REGULATIONS, STATUTES, ETC.)
Minnesota Statute 465.03 requires every acceptance of a grant or devise of real or
personal property on terms prescribed by donor be made by resolution and adopted by
two-thirds majority of the City Council.
Page 19 of 83

[PAGE 26]
CRITICAL TIMING ISSUES
Per the conditions of the grant, work cannot begin until the grant agreement is fully
approved and executed. Prompt action will allow Richfield to make full use of the
funding from MDH.
FINANCIAL IMPACT
• This grant will help defray the costs of the Backflow and Cross Connection
Prevention program, reducing stress on the water utility budget.
• City matching funds equal to the grant award are required as part of this grant
agreement, however, the City has already programmed funding for this effort in
excess of the grant match requirements, so no new funding source is necessary
to utilize the grant funds.
LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS
The grant agreement has been reviewed by the City Attorney.
ALTERNATIVE RECOMMENDATION(S)
None.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Resolution
2. Grant Agreement
Page 20 of 83

[PAGE 27]
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE CITY OF RICHFIELD TO ACCEPT GRANT FUNDS IN
THE AMOUNT OF $11,208.26 AND ENTER INTO A SOURCE WATER PROTECTION
GRANT AGREEMENT (SWIFT CONTRACT NUMBER 284828) WITH MINNESOTA
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH FOR A BACKFLOW AND CROSS CONNECTION
PREVENTION PROGRAM
WHEREAS, the Richfield Public Works Department has applied for and been
awarded a Source Water Protection Grant in the amount of $11,208.26; and
WHEREAS, the City intends to use these funds to support its backflow and cross
connection prevention program; and
WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes, section 465.03 requires every acceptance of a
grant or devise of real or personal property on terms prescribed by the donor be made by
resolution adopted by a two-thirds majority of the City Council.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City of
Richfield, Minnesota, as follows:
1. That the City Council of the City of Richfield hereby authorizes the Mayor
and City Manager to enter into the Source Water Protection Grant
Agreement (SWIFT Contract Number 284828) with Minnesota
Department of Health in the amount of $11,208.26.
2. Appropriate City personnel are authorized to administer the funds in
accordance with the grant agreement and terms described by the
Minnesota Department of Health.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 10th day of
March, 2026.
Mary B. Supple, Mayor
ATTEST:
Michelle Friedrich, City Clerk
Page 21 of 83

[PAGE 28]
Docusign Envelope ID: 2B9ABAD1-B20B-47FB-99A8-455586F80343
Standard Grant Template - Version Nov 2025
SWIFT Contract Number 284828
Between MDH and City of Richfield
Minnesota Department of Health
Grant Agreement Cover Sheet
You have received a Grant Agreement from the Minnesota Department of Health (MDH). Information
about the Grant Agreement, including funding details, are included below. Contact your MDH Grant
Manager if you have questions about this cover sheet.
Attachment: Grant Agreement
Contact for MDH: Eddie Wojski, 651-201-4576, eddie.wojski@state.mn.us
Grantee SWIFT Information Grant Agreement Information Program & Funding Information
Name of MDH Grantee
SWIFT Contract Number: MDH Program Name:
(as it appears in SWIFT):
284828 Drinking Water Protection
City of Richfield
Effective Date:
March 13, 2026, OR the date all
SWIFT Vendor Number:
signatures are collected, and the Total State Grant Funds: $11,208.26
0000197711
agreement is fully executed, whichever Total Federal Grant Funds: $0
is later. Total Grant Funds (all funds):
SWIFT Vendor Location Code:
$11,208.26
001
Expiration Date:
February 26, 2027
REQ: 4116 Page 1 of 19
Page 22 of 83

[PAGE 29]
Docusign Envelope ID: 2B9ABAD1-B20B-47FB-99A8-455586F80343
Standard Grant Template - Version Nov 2025
SWIFT Contract Number 284828
Between MDH and City of Richfield
Minnesota Department of Health
Grant Agreement
This Grant Agreement is between the State of Minnesota, acting through its Commissioner of the
Department of Health (“MDH”) and City of Richfield (“Grantee”). Grantee’s address is 6700 Portland
Ave S, Richfield, MN 55423.
Recitals
1. MDH is empowered to enter into this Grant Agreement under Minn. Stat. §§ 144.05, 144.0742 and
§114D.50 Clean Water Fund.
2. MDH is in need of assisting public water suppliers to protect the source of drinking water.
3. The vision of MDH is for health equity in Minnesota, where all communities are thriving and all
people have what they need to be healthy. Health equity is achieved when every person has the
opportunity to attain their health potential. Grantee agrees, where applicable, to perform its work
with advancing health equity as a goal.
4. Grantee represents that it is duly qualified and will perform all the activities according to the terms
of this Grant Agreement.
Grant Agreement
1. Term of Agreement
1.1. Effective Date
March 13, 2026, or the date MDH obtains all required signatures under Minn. Stat.
§ 16B.98, subd. 5, whichever is later. Per Minn. Stat. § 16B.98, subd 7, no payments will be
made to the Grantee until this Grant Agreement is fully executed. Grantee must not begin
work until this Grant Agreement is fully executed and MDH’s Authorized Representative has
notified Grantee that work may commence. No costs may be incurred prior to the Grant
Agreement being fully executed.
1.2. Expiration Date
February 26, 2027, or until all obligations have been fulfilled to the satisfaction of MDH,
whichever occurs first.
1.3. Survival of Terms
The following clauses survive the expiration or cancellation of this Grant Agreement:
Liability; Financial Examinations; Government Data Practices; Tax Compliance Verification;
REQ: 4116 Page 2 of 19
Page 23 of 83

[PAGE 30]
Docusign Envelope ID: 2B9ABAD1-B20B-47FB-99A8-455586F80343
Standard Grant Template - Version Nov 2025
SWIFT Contract Number 284828
Between MDH and City of Richfield
Ownership of Equipment and Supplies; Intellectual Property; Publicity and Endorsement;
and Governing Law, Jurisdiction, and Venue.
2. Activities
2.1. MDH’s Activities
MDH activities, in accordance with the Minnesota Department of Administration's Office of
Grants Management's policies and federal regulations, may include but are not limited to
financial reconciliations, site visits, programmatic monitoring of activities performed, and
grant activity evaluation.
2.2. Grantee’s Activities
Grantee, who is not a state employee, shall conduct the activities specified in Exhibit A,
which is attached and incorporated into this Grant Agreement.
3. Time
Grantee is required to perform all of the activities stated in this Grant Agreement, and any
incorporated exhibits, within the Grant Agreement period. MDH is not obligated to extend the
Grant Agreement period. Failure to meet a deadline may be a basis for a determination by MDH’s
Authorized Representative that Grantee has not complied with the terms of the Grant Agreement.
4. Award and Payment
MDH will award funds to Grantee for all activities performed in accordance with this Grant
Agreement.
4.1. Grant Award
Reimbursement will be in accordance with the agreed upon budget contained in Exhibit B,
which is attached and incorporated into this Grant Agreement.
4.2. Administrative Costs.
Grantee agrees that administrative costs must be necessary and reasonable as a condition
of this Grant Agreement pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 16B.98, subd 1. Administrative costs will
be reimbursed in accordance with the agreed upon budget.
4.3. Travel Expenses
Grantee will be reimbursed for mileage at the current IRS rate in effect at the time the
travel occurred; meals and lodging expenses will be reimbursed in the same manner and in
no greater amount than provided in the current “Commissioner’s Plan” promulgated by the
Commissioner of Minnesota Management and Budget (“MMB”); or, at the Grantee’s
established rate (for all travel related costs), whichever is lower, at the time travel occurred.
Grantee will not be reimbursed for travel and subsistence expenses incurred outside
Minnesota unless Grantee has received MDH’s prior written approval for out-of-state
travel. Minnesota will be considered the home state for determining whether travel is out-
of-state.
4.4. Budget Modifications
REQ: 4116 Page 3 of 19
Page 24 of 83

[PAGE 31]
Docusign Envelope ID: 2B9ABAD1-B20B-47FB-99A8-455586F80343
Standard Grant Template - Version Nov 2025
SWIFT Contract Number 284828
Between MDH and City of Richfield
Grantee may modify any line item in the most recently agreed-upon budget by up to 10
percent without prior written approval from MDH. Grantee must notify MDH of any
modifications up to 10 percent in writing no later than the next invoice. Grantee must
obtain prior written approval from MDH for line-item modifications greater than 10
percent. Grantee’s failure to obtain MDH’s prior approval may result in denial of
modification request, loss of funds, or both. The total obligation of MDH for all
compensation and reimbursements to Grantee shall not exceed the total obligation listed
under “Total Obligation.”
4.5. Total Obligation
The total obligation of MDH for all compensation and reimbursements to Grantee under
this Grant Agreement will not exceed $11,208.26.
4.6. Terms of Payment
4.6.1. Invoices
MDH will promptly pay Grantee after Grantee presents an itemized invoice for the
activities actually performed and MDH’s Authorized Representative accepts the invoiced
activities. Invoices must be submitted at least quarterly or according to a schedule
agreed upon by the Parties. The final invoice is due 30 calendar days after the expiration
date of the Grant Agreement.
4.6.2. Matching Requirements
Grantee certifies that the following matching requirement, for the Grant
Agreement will be met by Grantee:
By submitting an invoice for the total cost of the project Grantee certifies that
the cost share requirement of $11,208.26 has been met.
If the total cost of the project ends up being less than $22,416.52, Grantee
agrees to contribute a minimum cost share of 50% of the total cost of the
project.
4.7. Contracting and Bidding Requirements
4.7.1. Municipalities
A grantee that is a municipality, as defined in Minn. Stat. § 471.345, subd. 1, is subject to
the contracting requirements set forth under Minn. Stat. § 471.345. Projects that
involve construction work are subject to the applicable prevailing wage laws, including
those under Minn. Stat. § 177.41, et. seq.
4.7.2. Non-municipalities
Grantees that are not municipalities must adhere to the following standards in the
event that activities assigned to Grantee are to be subcontracted out to a third party:
i. Any services or materials that are expected to cost $100,000 or more must
undergo a formal notice and bidding process.
REQ: 4116 Page 4 of 19
Page 25 of 83

[PAGE 32]
Docusign Envelope ID: 2B9ABAD1-B20B-47FB-99A8-455586F80343
Standard Grant Template - Version Nov 2025
SWIFT Contract Number 284828
Between MDH and City of Richfield
ii. Services or materials that are expected to cost between $25,000 and $99,999 must
be competitively awarded based on a minimum of three verbal quotes or bids or
awarded to a targeted vendor.
iii. Services or materials that are expected to cost between $10,000 and $24,999 must
be competitively awarded based on a minimum of two verbal quotes or bids or
awarded to a targeted vendor.
iv. Grantee must take all necessary affirmative steps to assure that targeted vendors
from businesses with active certifications through the following entities are used
when possible:
1) Minnesota Department of Administration’s Certified Targeted Group,
Economically Disadvantaged and Veteran-Owned Vendor List
(https://mn.gov/admin/osp/government/procuregoodsandgeneralservices/tge
dvo-directory/);
2) Metropolitan Council’s Targeted Vendor list: Minnesota Unified Certification
Program (https://mnucp.metc.state.mn.us/); or
3) Small Business Certification Program through Hennepin County, Ramsey
County, and City of St. Paul: Central Certification Program
(https://cert.smwbe.com/).
v. Grantee must maintain written standards of conduct covering conflicts of interest
and governing the actions of its employees engaged in the selection, awarding and
administration of contracts.
vi. Grantee must maintain support documentation of the purchasing or bidding
process utilized to contract services in their financial records, including support
documentation justifying a single/sole source bid, if applicable.
vii. Notwithstanding parts (i) through (iv) above, MDH may waive the formal bidding
process requirements when:
• Vendors included in response to a competitive grant request for proposal
process were approved and incorporated as an approved work plan for the
Grant Agreement or
• There is only one legitimate or practical source for such materials or services
and Grantee has established that the vendor is charging a fair and reasonable
price.
viii. Projects that involve construction work of $25,000 or more, are subject to
applicable prevailing wage laws, including those under Minn. Stat. §§ 177.41
through 177.50.
ix. Grantee must not contract with vendors who are suspended or debarred by the
State of Minnesota or the federal government. The list of debarred vendors in
Minnesota is available at: Suspended/Debarred Vendors
(https://mn.gov/admin/osp/government/suspended-debarred/). The list of
suspended and debarred entities by the federal government is available at
www.sam.gov.
5. Conditions of Payment
REQ: 4116 Page 5 of 19
Page 26 of 83

[PAGE 33]
Docusign Envelope ID: 2B9ABAD1-B20B-47FB-99A8-455586F80343
Standard Grant Template - Version Nov 2025
SWIFT Contract Number 284828
Between MDH and City of Richfield
All activities performed by Grantee pursuant to this Grant Agreement must be performed in
accordance with the terms of this Grant Agreement, as determined in the sole discretion of MDH’s
Authorized Representative. Furthermore, all activities performed by Grantee must be in
accordance with all applicable federal, state, and local laws, ordinances, rules, and regulations.
Applicable state laws include, but are not limited to, the Minnesota Human Rights Act (Minn. Stat.
ch. 363A) which prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, creed, religion, national origin,
sex, gender, identity, sexual orientation, age, marital status, public assistance status, familial status,
and disability. MDH will not pay Grantee for work that MDH determines is noncompliant with the
terms and conditions of this Grant Agreement or performed in violation of federal, state, or local
law, ordinance, rule, or regulation.
6. Requirements for Other Legal Agreements
6.1. Grantee must utilize a formal legal agreement if it engages with another party to carry out a
portion of the activities listed in this Grant Agreement. Grantee must provide timely notice
to MDH of any such agreement prior to the other party/ies performing work under this
Grant Agreement. Such notice must include the name of the other party; description of the
activities to be performed; dates activities will be performed; and the total budget.
6.2. Grantee must monitor the activities of the other party/ies to ensure funds are used for
authorized purposes; is in compliance with the terms and conditions of the legal agreement,
Minn. Stat. § 16B.97, subd. 4(a)(1), and other relevant statutes and regulations; and that
performance goals are achieved.
6.3. If MDH becomes aware of unsatisfactory performance and or noncompliance, MDH
reserves the right to require Grantee to terminate the legal agreement with the other party.
6.4. No legal agreement with any other party shall terminate or in any way affect the legal
responsibility of the Grantee to MDH for timely and satisfactory performance of the Grant
Agreement.
6.5. Grantee and the other party must not enter into a legal agreement with vendors who are
suspended or debarred by the State of Minnesota or the federal government. The list of
debarred vendors in Minnesota is available at: Suspended/Debarred Vendors
(https://mn.gov/admin/osp/government/suspended-debarred/). The list of suspended and
debarred entities by the federal government is available at www.sam.gov.
7. Authorized Representatives
7.1. MDH’s Authorized Representative
MDH’s Authorized Representative for purposes of administering this Grant Agreement is
Eddie Wojski, SWP Grant Coordinator, 625 Robert Street N., PO Box 64975, St. Paul, MN
55164-0975, 651-201-4576, and eddie.wojski@state.mn.us, or their successor, and has the
responsibility to monitor Grantee’s performance and the final authority to accept the
activities performed under this Grant Agreement. If the activities performed are
satisfactory, MDH’s Authorized Representative will certify acceptance on each invoice
submitted for payment.
REQ: 4116 Page 6 of 19
Page 27 of 83

[PAGE 34]
Docusign Envelope ID: 2B9ABAD1-B20B-47FB-99A8-455586F80343
Standard Grant Template - Version Nov 2025
SWIFT Contract Number 284828
Between MDH and City of Richfield
7.2. Grantee’s Authorized Representative
Grantee’s Authorized Representative is Mattias Oddsson, Water Resources Engineer, 6700
Portland Ave S, Richfield, MN 55423, 612-861-9797, and moddsson@richfieldmn.gov, or
their successor. Grantee’s Authorized Representative has full authority to represent
Grantee in fulfillment of the terms, conditions, and requirements of this Grant Agreement.
If Grantee selects a new Authorized Representative at any time during this Grant
Agreement, Grantee must immediately notify MDH’s Authorized Representative in writing,
via e-mail or letter.
8. Assignment, Amendments, Waiver, and Grant Agreement Complete
8.1. Assignment
Grantee shall neither assign nor transfer any rights or obligations under this Grant
Agreement.
8.2. Amendments
If there are any amendments to this Grant Agreement, they must be in writing.
Amendments will not be effective until they have been executed and approved by MDH and
Grantee.
8.3. Waiver
If MDH fails to enforce any provision of this Grant Agreement, that failure does not waive
the provision or MDH’s right to enforce it.
8.4. Grant Agreement Complete
This Grant Agreement, and any incorporated exhibits, contains all the negotiations and
agreements between MDH and Grantee. No other understanding regarding this Grant
Agreement, whether written or oral, may be used to bind either party.
9. Liability
Grantee must indemnify and hold harmless MDH, its agents, and employees from all claims or
causes of action, including attorneys’ fees incurred by MDH, arising from the performance of this
Grant Agreement by Grantee or Grantee’s agents or employees. This clause will not be construed
to bar any legal remedies Grantee may have for MDH’s failure to fulfill its obligations under this
Grant Agreement. Nothing in this clause may be construed as a waiver by Grantee of any
immunities or limitations of liability to which Grantee may be entitled pursuant to Minn. Stat.
ch. 466, or any other statute or law.
10. Financial Examinations
The relevant books, records, documents, and accounting procedures and practices of Grantee and
any entity with which Grantee has engaged in carrying out the purpose of this Grant Agreement are
subject to examination under Minn. Stat. § 16B.98, subd. 8. Examinations may be conducted by
MDH, the Minnesota Commissioner of Administration, the Minnesota State Auditor, Attorney
General, or and the Minnesota Legislative Auditor, as appropriate, for a minimum of six years from
the end of this Grant Agreement, receipt and approval of all final reports, or the required period of
time to satisfy all state and program retention requirements, whichever is later.
REQ: 4116 Page 7 of 19
Page 28 of 83

[PAGE 35]
Docusign Envelope ID: 2B9ABAD1-B20B-47FB-99A8-455586F80343
Standard Grant Template - Version Nov 2025
SWIFT Contract Number 284828
Between MDH and City of Richfield
11. Government Data Practices
MDH, Grantee, and any other entity that the Grantee has contracted with to fulfill the purpose of
this Grant Agreement, must comply with the Minnesota Government Data Practices Act, Minn.
Stat. ch. 13, as it applies to all data provided by MDH under this Grant Agreement, and as it applies
to all data created, collected, received, stored, used, maintained, or disseminated by Grantee
under this Grant Agreement pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 13.05, subd. 11(a). The civil remedies of
Minn. Stat. § 13.08 apply to the release of the data referred to in this clause by either Grantee or
MDH.
If Grantee receives a request to release the data referred to in this clause, Grantee must
immediately notify MDH. MDH will give Grantee instructions concerning the release of the data to
the requesting party before any data is released. Grantee’s response to the request must comply
with the applicable law.
12. Tax Compliance Verification
Pursuant to Minn. Stat. § 270C.65, subd. 3, and all other applicable laws, Grantee consents to
disclosure of its Social Security Number (SSN), Individual Tax Identification Number (ITIN), Employer
Identification Number (EIN), and Minnesota Tax Identification Number (TIN), all of which have
already been provided to MDH, federal and state tax agencies, and state personnel involved in the
payment of state obligations. As may be applicable, these identification numbers may be used in
the enforcement of federal and state tax laws which could result in action requiring the Grantee to
file tax returns and pay delinquent tax liabilities, if any, or pay other state liabilities.
13. Ownership of Equipment and Supplies
13.1. Equipment
“Equipment” is defined as tangible personal property having a useful life of more than one
year and a per-unit acquisition cost which equals or exceeds $10,000. MDH shall have the
right to require transfer of all Equipment purchased with grant funds (including title) to
MDH or to an eligible non-State party named by MDH. MDH may require the transfer of
Equipment if the grant program is transferred to another grantee. At the end of this Grant
Agreement, grantee must contact MDH’s Authorized Representative for further instruction
regarding the disposition of Equipment.
13.2. Supplies
“Supplies” is defined as all tangible personal property other than those described in the
definition of Equipment. Grantee must notify MDH’s Authorized Representative regarding
any remaining Supplies with an aggregate market value of $10,000 or more for further
instruction regarding the disposition of those Supplies. For the purpose of this section,
Supplies includes but is not limited to computers and incentives.
14. Ownership of Materials and Intellectual Property Rights
14.1. Ownership of Materials
“Materials” is defined as any inventions, reports, studies, designs, drawings, specifications,
notes, documents, software, computer-based training modules, and other recorded
materials in whatever form. Grantee shall own all rights, title, and interest in all of the
REQ: 4116 Page 8 of 19
Page 29 of 83

[PAGE 36]
Docusign Envelope ID: 2B9ABAD1-B20B-47FB-99A8-455586F80343
Standard Grant Template - Version Nov 2025
SWIFT Contract Number 284828
Between MDH and City of Richfield
materials conceived, created, or otherwise arising out of the performance of this Grant
Agreement by it, its employees, or subgrantees, either individually or jointly with others.
Grantee hereby grants to MDH a perpetual, irrevocable, no-fee license and right to
reproduce, modify, distribute, perform, make, have made, and otherwise use the Materials
for any and all purposes, in all forms and manners that MDH, in its sole discretion, deems
appropriate. Grantee shall, upon the request of MDH, execute all papers and perform all
other acts necessary to document and secure this right and license to the Materials by
MDH. At the request of MDH, Grantee shall permit MDH to inspect the original Materials
and provide a copy of any of the Materials to MDH, without cost, for use by MDH in any
manner MDH, in its sole discretion, deems appropriate.
14.2. Intellectual Property Rights
Grantee represents and warrants that Materials produced or used under this Grant
Agreement do not and will not infringe upon any intellectual property rights of another
including but not limited to patents, copyrights, trade secrets, trade names, and service
marks and names. Grantee shall indemnify and defend MDH, at Grantee’s expense, from
any action or claim brought against MDH to the extent that it is based on a claim that all or
parts of the materials infringe upon the intellectual property rights of another. Grantee shall
be responsible for payment of any and all such claims, demands, obligations, liabilities,
costs, and damages including, but not limited to, reasonable attorney fees arising out of this
Grant Agreement, amendments and supplements thereto, which are attributable to such
claims or actions. If such a claim or action arises or in Grantee’s or MDH’s opinion is likely to
arise, Grantee shall at MDH’s discretion either procure for MDH the right or license to
continue using the materials at issue or replace or modify the allegedly infringing materials.
This remedy shall be in addition to and shall not be exclusive of other remedies provided by
law.
15. Workers’ Compensation
Grantee certifies that it is in compliance with Minn. Stat. § 176.181, subd. 2, which pertains to
workers’ compensation insurance coverage. Grantee’s employees and agents, and any contractor
hired by Grantee to perform the work required by this Grant Agreement and its employees, will not
be considered State employees. Any claims that may arise under the Minnesota Workers’
Compensation Act on behalf of these employees, and any claims made by any third party as a
consequence of any act or omission on the part of these employees, are in no way MDH’s
obligation or responsibility.
16. Publicity and Endorsement
16.1. Publicity
Any publicity given to the program, publications, or activities performed resulting from this
Grant Agreement, including but not limited to, websites, social media platforms, notices,
informational pamphlets, press releases, research, reports, signs, and similar public notices
prepared by or for Grantee or its employees individually or jointly with others, or any
subgrantees, must identify MDH as the sponsoring agency. If publicity is not specifically
authorized under this Grant Agreement, Grantee must obtain prior written approval from
REQ: 4116 Page 9 of 19
Page 30 of 83

[PAGE 37]
Docusign Envelope ID: 2B9ABAD1-B20B-47FB-99A8-455586F80343
Standard Grant Template - Version Nov 2025
SWIFT Contract Number 284828
Between MDH and City of Richfield
MDH’s Authorized Representative. If federal funding is being used for this Grant Agreement,
the federal program must also be recognized.
16.2. Endorsement
Grantee must not claim that MDH endorses its products, services, or activities.
17. Governing Law, Jurisdiction, and Venue
This Grant Agreement, amendments and supplements to it, shall be governed by the laws of the
State of Minnesota. Venue for all legal proceedings arising out of this Grant Agreement, or for
breach thereof, must be in the state or federal court with competent jurisdiction in Ramsey County,
Minnesota.
18. Clerical Error
Notwithstanding Clause “Assignment, Amendments, Waiver, and Grant Agreement Complete” of
this Grant Agreement, MDH reserves the right to unilaterally fix clerical errors, defined as
misspellings, minor grammatical or typographical mistakes or omissions, that do not have a
substantive impact on the terms of the Grant Agreement without executing an amendment. MDH
must inform Grantee of clerical errors that have been fixed pursuant to this paragraph within a
reasonable period of time.
19. Lobbying
19.1. Grantee must ensure that grant funds are not used for lobbying, which includes paying or
compensating any person for influencing or attempting to influence legislators or other
public officials on behalf or against proposed legislation, in connection with the awarding of
any federal contract, the making of any federal grant, the making of any federal loan, the
entering into of any cooperative agreement, or the extension, continuation, renewal,
amendment, or modification of any federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement.
19.2. In accordance with the provisions of 31 USC § 1352, if Grantee uses any funds other than
federal funds from MDH to conduct any of the aforementioned activities, Grantee must
complete and submit to MDH the disclosure form specified by MDH. Further, Grantee must
include the language of this section in all contracts and subcontracts, and all contractors
and subcontractors must comply accordingly.
19.3. Providing education about the importance of policies as a public health strategy, however,
is allowed. Education includes providing facts, assessment of data, reports, program
descriptions, and information about budget issues and population impacts, but stopping
short of making a recommendation on a specific piece of legislation. Education may be
provided to legislators, public policy makers, other decision makers, specific stakeholders,
and the general community.
19.4. By signing this Grant Agreement, Grantee certifies that it will not use any funds received
from MDH to employ, contract with, or otherwise coordinate the efforts of a lobbyist, as
defined in Minn. Stat. § 10A.01, subd. 21. This requirement also applies to any
subcontractors or subgrantees that Grantee may engage for any activities pertinent to this
Grant Agreement.
REQ: 4116 Page 10 of 19
Page 31 of 83

[PAGE 38]
Docusign Envelope ID: 2B9ABAD1-B20B-47FB-99A8-455586F80343
Standard Grant Template - Version Nov 2025
SWIFT Contract Number 284828
Between MDH and City of Richfield
20. Voter Registration Requirement
Grantee will comply with Minn. Stat. § 201.162, by providing voter registration services for its
employees and for the public served by Grantee.
21. Debarment, Suspension and Responsibility Certification
Federal regulation 2 CFR § 200.214 prohibits MDH from purchasing goods or services with federal
money from any party that has been suspended or debarred by the federal government. Similarly,
Minn. Stat. §§ 16C.03, subd. 2, and 16B.97, subd. 3, provides the Commissioner of Administration
with the authority to debar and suspend any party that seeks to contract with MDH.
Anyone may be suspended or debarred when it is determined, through a duly authorized hearing
process, that they have abused the public trust in a serious manner. In particular, the federal
government expects MDH to have a process in place for determining whether a vendor has been
suspended or debarred, and to prevent such vendors from receiving federal funds.
By signing this Grant Agreement, Grantee certifies that it and its principals:
a) Are not presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible, or
voluntarily excluded from transacting business by or with any federal, state or local
governmental department or agency;
b) Have not within a three-year period preceding this Grant Agreement: a) been convicted of or
had a civil judgment rendered against them for commission of fraud or a criminal offense in
connection with obtaining, attempting to obtain or performing a public (federal, state or local)
transaction or contract; b) violated any federal or state antitrust statutes; or c) committed
embezzlement, theft, forgery, bribery, falsification or destruction of records, making false
statements or receiving stolen property;
c) Are not presently indicted or otherwise criminally or civilly charged by a governmental entity
for: a) commission of fraud or a criminal offense in connection with obtaining, attempting to
obtain or performing a public (federal, state of local) transaction; b) violating any federal or
state antitrust statutes; or c) committing embezzlement, theft, forgery, bribery, falsification or
destruction of records, making false statement or receiving stolen property; and
d) Are not aware of any information and possess no knowledge that any subcontractor(s) that will
perform work pursuant to this Grant Agreement are in violation of any of the certifications set
forth above.
22. Incentives
When included in the approved Work Plan or Budget, the following language applies.
22.1. Handling of Incentives
Grantee is required to have policies and procedures in place addressing the purchasing,
security, distribution, and asset tracking of incentives. All grantee staff involved in the
purchase, distribution, security, and reconciling of incentives must be trained on the
grantee’s policies and procedures prior to the grantee placing any order for incentives.
Those policies and procedures must, at a minimum, include the provisions outlined in this
section.
REQ: 4116 Page 11 of 19
Page 32 of 83

[PAGE 39]
Docusign Envelope ID: 2B9ABAD1-B20B-47FB-99A8-455586F80343
Standard Grant Template - Version Nov 2025
SWIFT Contract Number 284828
Between MDH and City of Richfield
22.2. Separation of duties
More than one Grantee staff person must be involved in the management and handling of
the incentives. The Grantee staff who authorizes the purchase of incentives must not have
sole physical access to the incentives. The Grantee staff who will have physical access to the
incentives cannot have sole access to modify the incentives records. Handoff of incentive
from one person to another must be documented.
22.3. Distribution of Incentives
Incentives may only be used for approved purposes by MDH.
a) Only one incentive can be given to an individual per occurrence/event.
b) Undistributed incentives must always be kept in a secure location. Incentive instruments
must never be stored in any personal homes, they must always be securely stored in the
grantee’s business space.
c) Grantee will purchase and have on hand no more than three months’ worth of
incentives at any given time. The three months’ worth must be based off the most
currently approved workplan. All incentives must be distributed prior to grantee
purchasing additional incentives.
d) Grantee will be responsible for the costs of any incentives that remain undistributed at
the end of the Grant Agreement.
e) If MDH provided the grantee with the incentives, the return of undistributed incentives
to MDH must occur in person with the MDH’s Authorized Representative within 30
calendar days of the grant expiration date. If in-person return is not possible, the
grantee must return undistributed incentives via courier or via US Mail that requires
signatures and a tracking number within 30 calendar days of the grant expiration date.
f) The tracking log must be returned separately from the physical cards. Electronic return
is the preferred method for the tracking log.
22.4. Incentive tracking documentation
The tracking documentation the Grantee is required to maintain must not contain any
private data. The tracking system must record the following:
a) Number of incentives on hand, including starting balance and any additional incentives
purchased;
b) description of the incentives;
c) quantity of incentive(s) distributed to each participant;
d) the last four digits of any pre-paid card number;
e) value/amount;
f) a unique non-identifiable data point for each participant (e.g. case number, file
number);
g) date participant received incentive(s); and
h) signature of Grantee staff member providing incentive(s) to participant(s).
22.5. Reconciliation
REQ: 4116 Page 12 of 19
Page 33 of 83

[PAGE 40]
Docusign Envelope ID: 2B9ABAD1-B20B-47FB-99A8-455586F80343
Standard Grant Template - Version Nov 2025
SWIFT Contract Number 284828
Between MDH and City of Richfield
At least two different Grantee staff must reconcile the incentives at least quarterly. The
Grantee staff conducting the reconciliation must not also be the handlers of the incentives.
The reconciliation must include the dates and signature of the two people who perform the
reconciliation. Grantee must submit the reconciliation documentation to MDH’s Authorized
Representative no less than two weeks after each reconciliation.
22.6. Subcontracting/Subgranting
The Grantee must communicate and verify that their subcontracts/subgrants will only use
incentives for MDH approved purposes. The Grantee will be responsible for monitoring,
oversight, and reconciliation of any incentives that its subcontractors or subgrantees
purchase and distribute and will include this same language in any of its subgrants or
subcontracts that it enters as part of its work for MDH.
22.7. Lost or stolen incentives
The Grantee bears all financial responsibility for any unaccounted for, lost, or stolen
incentives.
22.8. Invoicing
If the Grantee purchased the incentives themselves, the Grantee must only invoice MDH for
the incentives after they’ve been distributed.
22.9. Failure to Comply
For grantees who do not have effective written policies and procedures in place before
purchasing incentives, MDH reserves the right to withhold payment and or request
reimbursement in the amount equal to the unallowable costs. Withheld payments will be
released when the grantee provides documentation to MDH that it has written effective
policies and procedures in place. Grantees who do not comply with this requirement may
be subject to increased monitoring and will be offered technical assistance. MDH also
reserves the right to terminate a Grant Agreement for failure to comply with these
requirements.
23. Conflict of Interest
Grantee will notify MDH’s Authorized Representative when they become aware of any potential,
perceived, or actual conflict of interests as it relates to this Grant Agreement.
24. Mandatory Disclosures
An applicant, recipient, or subrecipient of funding under this Grant Agreement must promptly
disclose whenever, in connection with this Grant Agreement (including any activities or subawards
thereunder), it has credible evidence of the commission of a violation of criminal law involving
fraud, conflict of interest, bribery, or gratuity violations found in Title 18 of the United States Code
or Minn. Stat., ch. 609, or a violation of the civil False Claims Act (31 U.S.C. 329–3733) or Minn. Stat.
§ 609.465 (prohibiting the presentation of false claims to a public officer or body). The disclosure
must be made in writing to the Federal agency (if applicable), the Federal agency’s Office of
Inspector General (if applicable), and MDH. Applicants, recipients, and subrecipients are also
required to report matters related to recipient integrity and performance in accordance with
REQ: 4116 Page 13 of 19
Page 34 of 83

[PAGE 41]
Docusign Envelope ID: 2B9ABAD1-B20B-47FB-99A8-455586F80343
Standard Grant Template - Version Nov 2025
SWIFT Contract Number 284828
Between MDH and City of Richfield
Appendix XII of 2 CFR § 200. Failure to make required disclosures can result in any of the remedies
described in 2 CFR § 200.339. (See also 2 CFR § 180, 31 U.S.C. 3321, and 41 U.S.C. 2313.)
25. Whistleblower Protections
An employee of a recipient or subrecipient must not be discharged, demoted, or otherwise
discriminated against as a reprisal for disclosing to a representative of MDH or a person or body
described in paragraph (a)(2) of 41 U.S.C. 4712 information that the employee reasonably believes
is evidence of gross mismanagement of a Federal or state contract or grant, a gross waste of
Federal or state funds, an abuse of authority relating to a Federal or state contract or grant, a
substantial and specific danger to public health or safety, or a violation of law, rule, or regulation
related to a Federal or state contract (including the competition for or negotiation of a contract) or
grant. The recipient and subrecipient must inform their employees in writing of employee
whistleblower rights and protections under 41 U.S.C. 4712 and Minn. Stat. §§ 15C.145 and 181.932
- .935. See statutory requirements for whistleblower protections at 10 U.S.C. 4701, 41 U.S.C. 4712,
41 U.S.C. 4304, and 10 U.S.C. 4310.
26. Suspension for Insufficient Funding
In the event of temporary lack of funding or appropriation, MDH may suspend its obligations under
this Grant Agreement without terminating it. This suspension will be for the duration of the lack of
funding or appropriation and shall not be considered a termination of the Grant Agreement. MDH
will not be assessed any penalty if the Grant Agreement is terminated because of the decision of
the Minnesota Legislature, or other funding source, not to appropriate funds.
26.1. Grantee will be notified in writing of the temporary suspension, and Grantee’s ability to
perform under the Grant Agreement will be suspended during this period. MDH will provide
reasonable notice to Grantee of the lack of funding or appropriation and shall notify
Grantee once funding is restored or appropriated, and at MDH’s discretion, performance
under the Grant Agreement may resume.
26.2. MDH may convert the suspension for insufficient funding to termination under clause 27.3.
upon written notice to Grantee.
26.3. Grantee may reject MDH’s suspension for insufficient funding by written response to the
notice of suspension. If Grantee rejects suspension, the notice of suspension shall be
effective as a notice of termination under clause 27.3 with the same effective date as was
provided for the suspension.
27. Termination
27.1. Termination by MDH or Grantee
MDH or Grantee may terminate this Grant Agreement without cause, with at least 21
calendar days’ written notice (i.e., by mail, email, or both) to the other party. Upon
termination, Grantee will be entitled to payment, determined on a pro rata basis, for
activities satisfactorily performed.
27.2. Termination for Cause
MDH may immediately terminate this Grant Agreement if MDH finds there has been a
failure to comply with the provisions of this Grant Agreement, that timely progress has not
REQ: 4116 Page 14 of 19
Page 35 of 83

[PAGE 42]
Docusign Envelope ID: 2B9ABAD1-B20B-47FB-99A8-455586F80343
Standard Grant Template - Version Nov 2025
SWIFT Contract Number 284828
Between MDH and City of Richfield
been made, or that the purposes for which the funds were granted have not been or will
not be fulfilled. MDH may take action to protect the interests of the State of Minnesota,
including the refusal to disburse additional funds and requiring the return of all or part of
the funds already disbursed.
27.3. Termination for Insufficient Funding
MDH may immediately terminate this Grant Agreement if it does not obtain funding from
the Minnesota Legislature or other funding sources; or if funding cannot be continued at a
level sufficient to allow for the payment of the work scope covered in this Grant Agreement.
Termination must be by written notice to Grantee; i.e., mail, email, or both. MDH is not
obligated to pay for any work performed after notice and effective date of the termination.
However, Grantee will be entitled to payment, determined on a pro rata basis, for activities
satisfactorily performed to the extent that funds are available.
MDH will not be assessed any penalty if this Grant Agreement is terminated because of the
decision of the Minnesota Legislature, or other funding source, not to appropriate funds.
MDH must provide Grantee notice of the lack of funding within a reasonable time of MDH
receiving notice of the same.
27.4. Termination by Commissioner of Administration
The Commissioner of Administration may immediately and unilaterally terminate this Grant
Agreement if further performance under the Grant Agreement would not serve MDH’s
purposes or performance under the Grant Agreement is not in the best interests of the
State of Minnesota.
Exhibits
The following Exhibits are attached and incorporated into this Grant Agreement. In the event of a
conflict between the terms of this Grant Agreement and its Exhibits, or between Exhibits, the order of
precedence is first the Grant Agreement, and then in the following order:
1. Exhibit A – Grantee’s Activities / Scope of Work
2. Exhibit B – Grantee’s Budget
[Signatures on following page]
REQ: 4116 Page 15 of 19
Page 36 of 83

[PAGE 43]
Docusign Envelope ID: 2B9ABAD1-B20B-47FB-99A8-455586F80343
Standard Grant Template - Version Nov 2025
SWIFT Contract Number 284828
Between MDH and City of Richfield
APPROVED:
1. State Encumbrance Verification
Individual certifies that funds have been encuAmberend as rnequire d Zby Mienn. Stiatm. §§ 16A.e15 antd 16CD.0i5g. itally signed by Ann Zeimet
Date: 2026.02.24 13:35:06 -06'00'
Signature:
284828/ 3000130397/ REQ 4116
SWIFT Contract & Initial PO:
2. Grantee
Grantee certifies that the appropriate persons(s) have executed the Grant Agreement on behalf of Grantee as required by applicable articles, bylaws,
resolutions, or ordinances.
Signature: Signature:
Title: Title:
Date: Date:
Signature: Signature:
Title: Title:
Date: Date:
3. Minnesota Department of Health
Grant agreement approval and certification that State funds have been encumbered as required by Minn. Stat. §§ 16A.15 and 16C.05.
Signature:
(with delegated authority)
Title:
Date:
Distribution:
All parties on the DocuSign envelope will receive a copy of the fully executed Grant Agreement.
REQ: 4116 Page 16 of 19
Page 37 of 83

[PAGE 44]
Docusign Envelope ID: 2B9ABAD1-B20B-47FB-99A8-455586F80343
Standard Grant Template - Version Nov 2025
SWIFT Contract Number 284828
Between MDH and City of Richfield
Exhibit A – Grantee’s Activities / Scope of Work
Grantee is expected to perform the following activities. Modifications to Exhibit A must be discussed
with MDH. MDH will communicate, in writing, with Grantee as to whether modifications are approved
or require a formal grant amendment.
Activity/Work Plan Anticipated Outcome
Through this program, we will ensure that
backflow prevention devices are installed
where needed, that they are inspected and
Development for a Backflow/Cross Connection
maintained in accordance with MDH and
prevention program.
plumbing code requirements, and that
hazardous cross connections are identified
and eliminated.
Terms and Conditions Additional Notes/Requirements
1. Grantee agrees that work shall take place only in the
MDH approved Drinking Water Supply Management Area
In Compliance with MDH standards
(DWSMA). Grantee will be reimbursed only for work that
takes place in the DWSMA.
2. Grantee shall pay in full any licensed contractor or
consultant hired for the purpose of completing any work In Compliance with MDH standards
under this Grant Agreement.
3. On or before the end date of this Agreement, the
Grantee shall provide MDH with one electronic copy of all
final products produced under this Grant Agreement,
including reports, publications, software and videos. If In Compliance with MDH standards
required by the nature of the project, data collected
during the project shall be reported in a format
acceptable to MDH.
4. In the event the Grantee is unable to satisfactorily
complete all the duties specified in this grant agreement,
the Grantee will forfeit payment. A Grantee who has not
satisfactorily fulfilled the grant obligations, including but In compliance with MDH standards
not limited to paying the contractor in full for all work
performed by the contractor, will be denied participation
in the next grant cycle.
5. In accordance with Minn. Stat. § 16B.98, subd. 5(d),
Grantee must clearly post on Grantee’s website the In compliance with MDH standards
names of, and contact information for, the Grantee’s
REQ: 4116 Page 17 of 19
Page 38 of 83

[PAGE 45]
Docusign Envelope ID: 2B9ABAD1-B20B-47FB-99A8-455586F80343
Standard Grant Template - Version Nov 2025
SWIFT Contract Number 284828
Between MDH and City of Richfield
Terms and Conditions Additional Notes/Requirements
leadership and the employee or other person who
directly manages and oversees this Grant Agreement on
behalf of the Grantee.
6. Any digital materials created, and shared outside of
the grantee’s organization, Grantee is required to comply
with State of Minnesota’s Digital Accessibility Standard.
This requirement flows down to any subcontractors and
In compliance with MDH standards
or any third-party entity the Grantee may utilize and
compensate with MDH grant funds. The statewide
Standard can be viewed online at Accessibility | Policies
& Standards / Minnesota IT Services
Grantee is subject to a variety of compliance activities, as outlined below.
Report Type Reporting Period / Due Date Due Date
Upon completion of the project, Grantee shall complete and submit an
Grant Narrative itemized Grant Invoice and a Grant Narrative Report to MDH SWP in the
2/26/2027
Report Fluxx portal system. The Grant Narrative Report and the Grant Invoice
shall be due no later than the expiration day of this Grant Agreement.
REQ: 4116 Page 18 of 19
Page 39 of 83

[PAGE 46]
Docusign Envelope ID: 2B9ABAD1-B20B-47FB-99A8-455586F80343
Standard Grant Template - Version Nov 2025
SWIFT Contract Number 284828
Between MDH and City of Richfield
Exhibit B – Grantee’s Budget
The budget shown below is for reference only and is non-binding.
Category Budget Period Total Grant Cost Share
Amount
Contractual 3/13/2026 to 2/26/2027 $11,208.26 $11,208.26
Grantee’s Indirect Cost Rate for this Grant Agreement is as follows:
Indirect costs are not allowed by Funder.
Permitting fees payable to MDH (i.e. well construction fee; well sealing fee) are not eligible and will be
deducted from the final invoice, before reimbursement.
Pressure tanks are grant eligible, as part of a new well construction and pump system project. The
pressure tank must be appropriately sized for the pump being proposed for the new well and not sized
for additional water storage. Pressure tank designed to serve the purpose of water storage, as well as
the replacement or maintenance of pressure tanks, remains ineligible for grant reimbursement.
Water lines may be reimbursed only from the well to the pressure tank or to the building, whichever
comes first.
REQ: 4116 Page 19 of 19
Page 40 of 83

[PAGE 47]
Certificate Of Completion
Envelope Id: 2B9ABAD1-B20B-47FB-99A8-455586F80343 Status: Sent
Subject: Complete with Docusign: 284828_Richfield_GA.pdf
Source Envelope:
Document Pages: 19 Signatures: 0 Envelope Originator:
Certificate Pages: 2 Initials: 0 Eddie Wojski
AutoNav: Enabled 625 Robert St. N
EnvelopeId Stamping: Enabled PO Box 64975
Time Zone: (UTC-06:00) Central Time (US & Canada) St. Paul, MN 55164
eddie.wojski@state.mn.us
IP Address: 156.98.136.30
Record Tracking
Status: Original Holder: Eddie Wojski Location: DocuSign
2/25/2026 10:23:49 AM eddie.wojski@state.mn.us
Security Appliance Status: Connected Pool: StateLocal
Storage Appliance Status: Connected Pool: Department of Health Location: Docusign
Signer Events Signature Timestamp
Mattias Oddson Sent: 2/25/2026 10:28:05 AM
moddsson@richfieldmn.gov Viewed: 2/25/2026 4:46:18 PM
Security Level: Email, Account Authentication
(None)
Electronic Record and Signature Disclosure:
Not Offered via Docusign
MDH Delegated
health.Delegated_Signature@state.mn.us
Security Level: Email, Account Authentication
(None)
Electronic Record and Signature Disclosure:
Not Offered via Docusign
In Person Signer Events Signature Timestamp
Editor Delivery Events Status Timestamp
Agent Delivery Events Status Timestamp
Intermediary Delivery Events Status Timestamp
Certified Delivery Events Status Timestamp
Carbon Copy Events Status Timestamp
health.encumbrance@state.mn.us
health.encumbrance@state.mn.us
Security Level: Email, Account Authentication
(None)
Electronic Record and Signature Disclosure:
Not Offered via Docusign
Mattias Oddson
moddsson@richfieldmn.gov
Security Level: Email, Account Authentication
(None)
Electronic Record and Signature Disclosure:
Not Offered via Docusign
Page 41 of 83

[PAGE 48]
Carbon Copy Events Status Timestamp
Abby Shea
abby.shea@state.mn.us
Security Level: Email, Account Authentication
(None)
Electronic Record and Signature Disclosure:
Not Offered via Docusign
Witness Events Signature Timestamp
Notary Events Signature Timestamp
Envelope Summary Events Status Timestamps
Envelope Sent Hashed/Encrypted 2/25/2026 10:28:05 AM
Payment Events Status Timestamps
Page 42 of 83

[PAGE 49]
City Council Meeting 3/10/2026
Agenda Section: Resolutions
Agenda Item: 11.a.
Report Prepared By:
Courtney DesCamps, Senior Analyst
Department Director:
Sack Thongvanh, Assistant City Manager
Item for Consideration:
Labor Agreement with The International Association of Firefighters, Local 1215
(firefighters, lieutenants, and captains) for 2026-2027.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
A two year labor agreement has been reached with The International Association of
Firefighters, Local 1215 bargaining unit. The contract takes effect January 1, 2026, and
will remain in effect through December 31, 2027. The agreement provides a cost-of-
living adjustment, market adjustment, an additional step for captains, and an increased
clothing and equipment allowance to support recruitment, retention, and internal pay
equity.
Primary changes include:
• 2026: 3% COLA + 0.25% market adjustment
• 2027: 3% COLA
• 2026 Clothing and Equipment Allowance: Increase from $800 to $850
• 2027 Clothing and Equipment Allowance: Increase from $850 to $900
• New hires will receive a Carcinogenic Resistance Turnout Gear Bag
• Starting in 2026, the captains' pay scale will have an additional step, providing a
1% increase from the prior step after an employee completes five years of
service in the captain rank
Additionally, Local 1215 members will receive the same insurance benefits, including
access to the new Minnesota Paid Leave program, as all other employee groups.
RECOMMENDED ACTION
By Motion: Adopt a resolution approving the provisions of the 2026-2027 labor
agreement with The International Association of Firefighters, Local 1215, and
authorize the City Manager to execute the agreements.
HISTORICAL CONTEXT
EQUITABLE OR STRATEGIC CONSIDERATIONS OR IMPACTS
The agreement provides a competitive compensation package that remains strong
Page 43 of 83

[PAGE 50]
among peer cities. The wage adjustments and additional captain step support pay
progression and recruitment and retention of experienced personnel.
POLICIES (RESOLUTIONS, ORDINANCES, REGULATIONS, STATUTES, ETC.)
The agreements conform to applicable City policies, state labor laws, and bargaining
obligations under PELRA. No deviations from standard contract format or past practice
are proposed.
CRITICAL TIMING ISSUES
Approval on March 10, 2026, allows accounting staff to update payroll and benefit
tables promptly, as the January 1, 2026 effective date requires retroactive pay
adjustments.
FINANCIAL IMPACT
Based on the City’s budget impact analysis, the total cost increase associated with the
negotiated wage adjustments, market adjustments, and an additional step for captains
is approximately $104,213 for 2026 and $98,105 for 2027. These increases reflect the
3% COLA, 0.25% market adjustment, updated clothing and equipment allowances, and
an additional step for captains.
The 2026 Fire Department budget assumed a 3% wage increase; however, the finalized
collective bargaining agreement includes a 3.25% increase, increased clothing and
equipment allowance, and an additional step for captains.
The resulting funding gap, approximately $9,195, will be addressed in the 2026 revised
budget through offsetting reductions within the Fire Department budget, with any
remaining overage expected to be offset through salary savings associated with long-
term leaves.
The resulting 2026–2027 wage structure remains comparable to peer cities and
supports ongoing recruitment and retention.
LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS
The agreement has been ratified by the bargaining unit membership. Approval finalizes
the negotiated agreement. If the terms are not approved, the City may need to return to
mediation and/or proceed to arbitration, which may delay implementation and impact
workforce operations.
ALTERNATIVE RECOMMENDATION(S)
• Do not approve the agreement and prepare for further negotiations or mediation.
• Defer the item to a future meeting.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Resolution Approving Labor Agreement with IAFF
Page 44 of 83

[PAGE 51]
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION APPROVING LABOR AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY
OF RICHFIELD AND THE INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF
FIREFIGHTERS, LOCAL 1215
BARGAINING UNIT FOR YEARS 2026-2027
WHEREAS, the City Manager and representatives of The International
Association of Firefighters, Local 1215 have negotiated terms and conditions of
employment for the 2026–2027 contract period; and
WHEREAS, the union has engaged in good-faith bargaining with the City; and
WHEREAS, State statute requires that contracts between the City and the
exclusive bargaining representatives of employees be approved by Council resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Richfield
hereby approves the 2026–2027 Labor Agreement between the City of Richfield and The
International Association of Firefighters, Local 1215, to be implemented effective January
1, 2026, and authorizes the City Manager to execute said agreement on behalf of the City.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota, this 10th day of
March 2026.
Mary Supple Mayor
ATTEST:
Michelle Friedrich City Clerk
Page 45 of 83

[PAGE 52]
City Council Meeting 3/10/2026
Agenda Section: Resolutions
Agenda Item: 11.b.
Report Prepared By:
Matt Hardegger, Transportation Engineer
Department Director:
Kristin Asher, Public Works Director
Item for Consideration:
Consider a resolution of support for Metro Transit's recommendation to route the
K Line Bus Rapid Transit line on Nicollet Avenue through Richfield.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Metro Transit has completed their Arterial Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) study, and has
recommended that the K Line alignment use Nicollet Avenue through the City of
Richfield. Metro Transit is requesting a resolution of support from the City for this
project. Arterial BRT Planning Manager Kyle O'Donnell Burrows will be providing a brief
presentation and will be available for any follow up questions.
RECOMMENDED ACTION
By Motion: Approve a resolution of support for Metro Transit's recommendation
to route the K Line Bus Rapid Transit line on Nicollet Avenue through Richfield.
HISTORICAL CONTEXT
In 2025, Metro Transit began a study to identify the next three arterial BRT lines within
their service area. BRT lines provide upgrades from local service, including faster
service, stations with more amenities, and signal priority. Service and amenities on the
K Line BRT would be similar to the service and amenities on the current D Line BRT on
Portland Avenue.
This study identified 17 candidate lines to evaluate, 11 of which were carried forward
past the initial screening for a technical evaluation. The technical evaluation included 4
lines within Richfield:
• Route 4 (Penn Avenue)
• Route 14 (Bloomington Avenue north of 66th Street)
• Route 18 (Nicollet Avenue)
• Route 515 (66th Street + Bloomington Avenue south of 66th Street)
Nicollet Avenue/Route 18 received the highest technical score of the evaluated lines
around the metro area, and was recommended to be advanced as the K Line (following
the J Line on West 7th Street). Metro Transit staff are still evaluating potential options—
including Route 4—for the L Line if the Franklin Avenue alignment is determined to not
be viable.
Page 46 of 83

[PAGE 53]
Hennepin County has also noted that "the segment of Nicollet Avenue (aka CSAH 52)
between 66th Street (CSAH 53) and 61st Street is currently in the County’s Work Plan –
which represents the subsequent five years beyond the County’s CIP (2026-2030). The
specific timing of a County reconstruction will be reviewed in the coming months – with
considerations for City programming/support, available funding, and coordination with
nearby projects (including, but not limited to, Penn Avenue and K Line)."
EQUITABLE OR STRATEGIC CONSIDERATIONS OR IMPACTS
Strategic Considerations: Improved bus service provided by an external agency
supports climate resilience as a priority and sustainable infrastructure financing.
Equitable Considerations: Improved bus service improves the commute times and
experience for residents who rely on public transit as a primary form of transportation.
POLICIES (RESOLUTIONS, ORDINANCES, REGULATIONS, STATUTES, ETC.)
Transit expansion and transitway investments are supported by the 2040
Comprehensive Plan.
CRITICAL TIMING ISSUES
A resolution of support is needed from the City for the Metropolitan Council to amend
the 2050 Transportation Policy Plan and include the K Line. This change affects
Comprehensive Planning, as well as searches for external funding sources for the
project.
FINANCIAL IMPACT
No financial impact is expected to the City as a result of this project.
LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS
None at this time.
ALTERNATIVE RECOMMENDATION(S)
None.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Resolution K Line 2026
2. ABRT Plan Update Slides for City of Richfield
Page 47 of 83

[PAGE 54]
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION OF SUPPORT FOR THE
METRO K LINE PROJECT
WHEREAS, the City of Richfield’s Comprehensive Plan promotes an integrated
transportation system that will serve the future needs of its residents, businesses, and
visitors; as well as supports the City’s redevelopment plans to complement the metropolitan
transportation system; and
WHEREAS, Metro Transit’s Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) offers riders fast, frequent
service with numerous amenities, that will give riders on the region’s transit system more
mobility options and connect people with jobs; and
WHEREAS, Metro Transit has completed their arterial bus rapid transit study and
identified the West 7th Corridor as the J Line and the Nicollet Avenue corridor as the K Line;
and
WHEREAS, the D Line BRT, which opened in winter 2022, has drawn increased
ridership and has been successful; and
WHEREAS, the K Line would follow Nicollet Avenue through Richfield; and
WHEREAS, the existing local bus route in this corridor is a frequent, high ridership
route that connects Richfield to Bloomington and Minneapolis; and
WHEREAS, the K Line could result in a faster trip, up to 25% faster, by stopping less
often, deploying bus priority at traffic signals, and implementing off-board fare payment; and
WHEREAS, the City of Richfield will benefit from improvements to stops within
Richfield, which will offer improved amenities, including security features, improved lighting,
real-time signage, and heated shelters; and
WHEREAS, the K Line project is anticipated to be constructed between 2030 and
2035.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Richfield expresses its
support for Metro Transit’s recommendation of the Nicollet Avenue Corridor to be the K Line.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 10th day of
March, 2026.
Mary B. Supple, Mayor
ATTEST:
Michelle Friedrich, City Clerk
Page 48 of 83

[PAGE 55]
Arterial BRT Plan Update – Recommended J Line and K Line
City of Richfield
Kyle O’Donnell Burrows | Planning Manager, Arterial BRT
Page 49 of 83

[PAGE 56]
Agenda
• Arterial BRT Plan Update Process Recap
• Recommendations
• Next Steps
We
are
here
1 . I D ENT I FY 2 . S CR EEN 3 . EVA LUAT E 4. P R I O R I T IZE
Spr i ng 2025 Summer 2025 Fal l 2025 W i nter 2025/26
2
Page 50 of 83

[PAGE 57]
A faster, more reliable ride
2-3 stations per mile for less Near-level curb for faster and Fares paid before getting
stopping and faster trips more accessible boarding on the bus
All door boarding for
quicker stops Transit signal priority to keep Faster, frequent, all-day service
buses moving
3
Page 51 of 83

[PAGE 58]
2025 ABRT Plan
Update F
• Identify the next three
arterial BRT lines:
– J Line, K Line, and L Line
C
– Planned to open between
Where should the next
2030 and 2035 A
H
– J Line to be submitted to lines go?
2026 Regional Solicitation
B
E G
D
5
Page 52 of 83

[PAGE 59]
Four-step 2025 plan update process
We
are
here
1 . I D ENT I FY 2 . S CR EEN 3 . EVA LUAT E 4. P R I O R I T IZE
Spr i ng 2025 Summer 2025 Fal l 2025 W i nter 2025/26
Apply technical
Identify large set of Conduct simple Perform detailed
evaluation and readiness
candidate corridors for screening to narrow technical evaluation of
criteria to prioritize next
consideration for consideration to most corridors and rank by
three lines
arterial BRT promising corridors technical score
METRO J Line
High technical score
METRO K Line
Medium technical score
METRO L Line
Low technical score
6
Page 53 of 83

[PAGE 60]
Step 1: Identify
Candidate Corridors
(March 2025)
• 17 candidate corridors
for consideration
• Screening criteria
applied to narrow to
corridors to advance
for evaluation
7
Page 54 of 83

[PAGE 61]
Step 2: 11 Advanced
Corridors for
Evaluation (July 2025)
1. 63rd Avenue / Zane
2. 66th Street
3. Bloomington / Lyndale N
4. Broadway
5. Franklin / Grand / 3rd Street
6. Johnson / Lyndale S
7. Lowry
8. Nicollet
9. Payne / Westminster
10.Randolph / East 7th Street
11.West 7th Street (added)
8
Corridors listed in alphabetical order, not screening rank.
Page 55 of 83

[PAGE 62]
Step 3: Technical Evaluation Results (November 2025)
Ridership Equity Costs Land use
Nicollet 23 15 11 22 70.5
Franklin / Grand / 3rd Street 24 17 8 20 68.9
West 7th Street 15 14 23 16 67.9
Payne / Westminster 12 18 17 14 60.0
Bloomington / Lyndale N 16 13 8 21 57.4
Johnson / Lyndale S 16 14 4 22 55.9
63rd Avenue / Zane 8 14 19 13 53.7
Broadway 14 16 8 14 52.2
Each goal is scored
out of a maximum
Randolph / East 7th Street 14 12 7 17 49.3
of 25 points
66th Street 8 15 13 12 48.4 (100 overall)
9 Lowry 10 14 7 15 46.0
Page 56 of 83

[PAGE 63]
Step 4: Prioritize
• Assess each corridor for • Coordinate with agency partners
readiness for implementation:
(cities, counties, MnDOT) on
– How compatible are current and timing of future roadway
future roadway conditions with
projects
arterial BRT infrastructure and
service? – Align planned arterial BRT projects
and planned or programmed
– How well does each corridor fit
roadway projects
within the existing and planned
transit network?
– Efficiently deliver major
– Are there major unanswered infrastructure investments
questions about the arterial BRT
– Avoid future delays in BRT
corridor alignment?
implementation
10
Page 57 of 83

[PAGE 64]
Recommendations
• J Line: West 7th Street
• K Line: Nicollet Avenue
• Complete additional study
in 2026 before identifying
the L Line:
– Answer key questions about
feasibility of Franklin /
Grand / 3rd Street corridor
– Following corridor study,
recommend L Line from
three candidate corridors
• Complete feasibility study
of C Line extensions (north
and/or south) on separate
Recommended
path
Recommended
K Line: Nicollet
J Line: West 7th
11
Page 58 of 83

[PAGE 65]
Recommended
METRO K Line:
Nicollet corridor
• Downtown Minneapolis to
American Boulevard, serving
South Minneapolis, Richfield,
Bloomington
• Top ranked corridor in
technical evaluation
• No major outstanding
questions about alignments,
termini, or network structure
• Clarity on downtown
alignment of Nicollet
Recommended
corridor is a key need K Line: Nicollet
12
Page 59 of 83

[PAGE 66]
Timeline for Arterial BRT Plan Update next steps
• February/March 2026: Business item recommending J Line and K Line for
Met Council adoption
• Spring 2026: Submit J Line (West 7th Street) for 2026 Regional Solicitation
• Spring 2026: Initiate TPP amendment to include J Line and K Line
• METRO K Line planning anticipated to begin in 2027
13
Page 60 of 83

[PAGE 67]
City Council Meeting 3/10/2026
Agenda Section: Resolutions
Agenda Item: 11.c.
Report Prepared By:
Matt Hardegger, Transportation Engineer
Department Director:
Kristin Asher, Public Works Director
Item for Consideration:
Consider approval of a resolution authorizing the Mayor and City Manager to
execute a Memorandum of Understanding with MnDOT related to future
improvements at the 76th Street and I-35W interchange.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
At the January 13, 2026 regular meeting, the City Council disapproved municipal
consent for Phase 2 of the I-494 Corridor Vision project, requesting that MnDOT include
safety work at the 76th Street and I-35W interchange. After review, it was determined
MnDOT cannot include this work as part of Phase 2, primarily due to required
environmental documentation and project approval deadline constraints. This
Memorandum of Understanding outlines the plan and procedure for the City and
MnDOT to collaboratively develop and construct improvements at the 76th Street and I-
35W interchange.
RECOMMENDED ACTION
By Motion: Approve a resolution authorizing the Mayor and City Manager to
execute a Memorandum of Understanding with MnDOT related to future
improvements at the 76th Street and I-35W interchange.
HISTORICAL CONTEXT
The 76th Street and I-35W interchange is a frequent source of safety concerns in the
City, especially for pedestrians and bicyclists navigating the regional trail through the
interchange. There are three schools within a half mile of the interchange, and two more
schools within one mile of the interchange, resulting in students frequently biking
through this interchange to get to and from classes.
Improvements to this interchange were studied as part of the I-494 Vision process,
including multiple reconfiguration options for the ramps. These options were expensive,
several required significant right of way acquisition, and the changes did not appear to
be needed from a traffic perspective. Ultimately, work at this interchange was removed
from the Corridor Vision.
In January 2026, the City Council disapproved the Phase 2 layout, requesting that
MnDOT include bike and pedestrian safety measures at the interchange. Over the
following month, MnDOT and City staff negotiated this Memorandum of Understanding,
outlining a process for both parties to follow to identify and construct improvements at
this interchange.
Page 61 of 83

[PAGE 68]
EQUITABLE OR STRATEGIC CONSIDERATIONS OR IMPACTS
Strategic considerations: Finding a state-funded solution to the safety concerns at the
interchange supports City goals of sustainable infrastructure funding, climate resilience
as a priority, and infrastructure that meets service needs.
Equitable considerations: This interchange has five schools within a mile of the
crossings, and has been frequently cited as a pedestrian and bicyclist safety risk.
Finding and funding improvements at this intersection would create safer conditions for
everyone who uses this bridge without a car, especially students.
POLICIES (RESOLUTIONS, ORDINANCES, REGULATIONS, STATUTES, ETC.)
This item has been negotiated as a result of Resolution No. 12397 from the January 13,
2026 City Council meeting.
CRITICAL TIMING ISSUES
Approval of the MOU is necessary to resolve the City Council's condition of disapproval
of the project layout. MnDOT is seeking a resolution to the municipal consent process to
maintain project approval deadlines and let the project in fall of 2026.
FINANCIAL IMPACT
• Approval of the MOU will not cost the City any money.
• The intent of the MOU is for MnDOT to fund any improvements identified at this
interchange, however, MnDOT funds typically come with statutory restraints that
govern what the agency can and cannot spend money on.
• While staff expect any improvements identified to be within MnDOT right of way,
anything that is in City-owned right of way would be the City's responsibility to
fund.
LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS
The Memorandum of Understanding has been reviewed by the City Attorney, who will
be available for any questions.
ALTERNATIVE RECOMMENDATION(S)
None.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Resolution 76th MOU 2026
2. MnDOT contract 1062741 MOU Richfield I35W 76th St
Page 62 of 83

[PAGE 69]
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE A
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING WITH THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION RELATED TO PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLIST SAFETY
IMPROVEMENTS AT THE 76TH STREET AND 1-35W INTERCHANGE
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Richfield is the official governing body of
the City of Richfield, Minnesota; and
WHEREAS, the Minnesota Department of Transportation (“MnDOT”) is developing a
project (the “Project”) to construct Project 2 of the I-494 Corridor Vision. Project 2 of the I-
494 Corridor Vision will construct an E-ZPass lane on I-494 between I-35W and 24th
Avenue, reconstruct pavement on I-35W between American Boulevard and 75th Street,
reconstruct the railroad bridge at Pleasant Avenue, reconstruct 78th Street east of 12th
Avenue, reconstruct the I-494/Highway 77 interchange, and perform bridge deck
rehabilitation on the Lyndale Avenue bridge over I-494, construct ADA improvements on the
impacted local system, construct drainage system improvements, and construct utility
relocations; and
WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes Section 161.164 provides, “Before proceeding with
the construction, reconstruction, or improvement of any route on the trunk highway system
lying within any municipality, the commissioner [of transportation] shall submit to its
governing body a final layout and project report covering the purpose, route location, and
proposed design of the highway... [which] must include a good-faith cost estimate of all the
costs in which the governing body is expected to participate... The governing body shall,
within 60 days of receiving a final layout from the commissioner, conduct a public hearing at
which the Department of Transportation shall present the final layout for the project... Within
90 days from the date of the public hearing, the governing body shall approve or disapprove
the final layout in writing…”; and
WHEREAS, on January 13th, 2026, the Richfield City Council disapproved the project
layout and requested that pedestrian and bicyclist safety improvements be included at the
76th Street and I-35W interchange; and
WHEREAS, the City has consistently advocated for safety improvements for
pedestrians and bicyclists at the 76th Street and I-35W interchange ramps that are traversed
by a Three Rivers Park District Regional Trail; and
WHEREAS, there are five schools within close proximity to this interchange, and
school-aged children must traverse these intersections every day; and
WHEREAS, State and City staff have negotiated this Memorandum of Understanding
to identify and construct pedestrian and bicyclist safety improvements at this interchange
outside of the I-494 Phase 2 project; and
WHEREAS, the City of Richfield invests in infrastructure to best serve today’s and
tomorrow’s residents, businesses, and visitors; and
Page 63 of 83

[PAGE 70]
WHEREAS, the City of Richfield ensures that City services are accessible to people
of all races, ethnicities, incomes, and abilities.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Mayor and City Manager are
hereby authorized to execute the Memorandum of Understanding with the Minnesota
Department of Transportation, and take any steps needed to implement the items agreed
upon between the City and MnDOT.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 10th day of March, 2026.
Mary B. Supple, Mayor
ATTEST:
Michelle Friedrich, City Clerk
Page 64 of 83

[PAGE 71]
MnDOT Contract Number: 1062741
STATE OF MINNESOTA
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING (MOU)
This Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) is between the Minnesota Department of Transportation (“MnDOT”) and
The City of Richfield, MN (“City”).
1. Term of MOU
1.1. Effective Date: This MOU will be effective on the date signed by all necessary state officials, as required by
Minnesota Statutes §16C.05, subdivision 2.
1.2. Expiration Date: This MOU will expire on 12/31/2030, or when all obligations have been satisfactorily
fulfilled, whichever occurs first.
2. Purpose and Scope
2.1. The purpose of this MOU is to outline and assure a commitment between MnDOT and the City to
investigate, program, and construct safety improvements at the I-35W/76th St interchange area.
2.2. The I-494 Corridor Vision Project represents a nearly $1 billion investment that has been in development for
more than a decade. Construction is underway on Project 1 with completion anticipated in the fall of 2026.
Construction on Project 2 is expected to begin in the spring of 2027 with anticipated completion in the fall of
2030.
2.3. The City has expressed continued concern about these intersections. The City has referenced non-motorized
crash history, near-miss crashes, the regional trail, and nearby schools as important considerations requiring
intersection safety improvements.
2.4. MnDOT proposes to address the City’s concerns outside the I-494 Corridor Vision Project 2. MnDOT
proposes the following scope for completion in partnership with the City.
2.4.1. Via a separate agreement, MnDOT will hire a consultant to perform a comprehensive review of the
interchange area and identify physical improvements at the interchange to address safety concerns.
The consultant will be agreed upon by both parties.
2.4.2. MnDOT and City engage in joint workshops to develop recommendations related to operations and
safety.
2.4.3. MnDOT and City detail potential improvements at the interchange. These improvements are
anticipated to be concept level and require additional engineering and environmental review.
2.4.4. MnDOT funds agreed upon improvements through its transportation improvement program or other
available funding methods. Funding and implementation by MnDOT is limited to trunk highway
eligible items and subject to programming requirements and an appropriation of funds .
2.5. Schedule
2.5.1. MnDOT and City aim to start 2.4.1 through 2.4.2 by December 31, 2026.
2.5.2. MnDOT will, after 2.4.3 is complete, begin programming trunk highway eligible projects and work
with the City on identifying funding for non-TH eligible portions, with a goal of constructing identified
safety improvements no later than September 30, 2030.
1
Page 65 of 83

[PAGE 72]
MnDOT Contract Number: 1062741
3. Responsibilities
3.1. MnDOT will provide staff and resources to accomplish the MOU’s purpose and scope as defined above.
3.2. City will make available staff to support the MOU’s purpose and scope as defined above.
4. No Contractual Obligations
4.1. This MOU is not a legally binding agreement and creates no legally binding obligations for any party. Either
party may, upon written notice to the other, amend, or discontinue its role outlined in the MOU. Because of
this mutual desire to proceed, each party fully intends to make a good faith effort to achieve the goals
described above including working together to find mutually beneficial solutions when problems arise.
5. MOU Personnel
5.1. MnDOT’s Authorized Representative will be:
Name/Title: Khani Sahebjam/MnDOT Metro District Engineer, or successor
MnDOT – Metro District
Street Address: 1500 West County Rd B2
City State Zip: Roseville, MN 55113
Telephone: 651-234-7700
Email: Khani.Sahebjam@state.mn.us
5.2. Richfield’s Authorized Representative will be:
Name/Title: Joe Powers/City Engineer, or successor
Street Address: 1901 E 66th St
City State Zip: Richfield, MN 55423
Telephone: 612-861-9791
Email: jpowers@richfieldmn.gov
6. Government Data
6.1. The parties acknowledge that this MOU, as well as any data created, collected, stored, or received under the
terms of this MOU, are “Government Data” within the meaning of the Minnesota Government Data
Practices Act (Minnesota Statutes chapter 13), and that they must comply with the provisions of the Act as it
relates to such data.
[THE BALANCE OF THIS PAGE HAS INTENTIONALLY BEEN LEFT BLANK]
2
Page 66 of 83

[PAGE 73]
MnDOT Contract Number: 1062741
CITY OF RICHFIELD MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
The City of Richfield certifies that the appropriate
person(s) have executed the MOU on behalf of the City By:
as required by applicable law.
Date:
By:
Title: MnDOT - Metro District Engineer
Title:
Date: MnDOT CONTRACT MANAGEMENT
for form and execution
By:
By:
Title:
Date:
Date:
3
Page 67 of 83

[PAGE 74]
City Council Meeting 3/10/2026
Agenda Section: Resolutions
Agenda Item: 11.d.
Report Prepared By:
Matt Hardegger, Transportation Engineer
Department Director:
Kristin Asher, Public Works Director
Item for Consideration:
Consider a resolution approving the project layout and providing Municipal
Consent for Phase 2 of the I-494 Corridor Vision Project and repealing Resolution
No. 12397.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT) has requested that the Council
revisit municipal consent for a highway project on I-494. A resolution of disapproval for
this project was passed on January 13, 2026, with a condition to include safety
improvements for pedestrians and bicyclists at the 76th Street and I-35W interchange.
Staff have negotiated the previously considered Memorandum of Understanding with
MnDOT to identify and implement these safety improvements over the next several
years.
Project 2 of the I-494 Corridor Vision would:
• Construct an E-ZPass lane on I-494 between I-35W and 24th Avenue
• Reconstruct pavement on I-35W between American Boulevard and 75th Street
• Reconstruct the railroad bridge at Pleasant Avenue
• Reconstruct 78th Street east of 12th Avenue
• Reconstruct the I-494/Highway 77 interchange
• Perform bridge deck rehabilitation on the Lyndale Avenue bridge over I-494.
Other work in the project's scope outside of Richfield includes E-ZPass extension on I-
494 between West Bush Lake Road and Highway 100 and reconstruction of the I-
35W/82nd Street interchange in Bloomington.
RECOMMENDED ACTION
By Motion: Adopt the resolution approving the project layout and providing
municipal consent for Project 2 of the I-494 Corridor Vision and repealing
Resolution No. 12397.
HISTORICAL CONTEXT
MnDOT is in the process of completing the approved I-494 Corridor Vision ("Vision"),
which was developed in consultation with the adjacent communities along the corridor
through a Project Advisory Committee of local and state elected officials. The Vision
was originally broken into 4 individual projects, with projects expected to be advanced
Page 68 of 83

[PAGE 75]
as funding became available.
Project 1 was given municipal consent by the Richfield City Council in February 2022
and began construction in 2023, with a bid price of approximately $377 Million. Project 1
included significant ramp reconfigurations at the I-35W/I-494 interchange and the I-
494/Penn Avenue interchange, construction of an additional E-ZPass lane between
Highway 100 and I-35W, construction of a new pedestrian bridge at Chicago Avenue,
and access reconfiguration at Nicollet Avenue/Portland Avenue/12th Avenue resulting in
access removal at Nicollet Avenue and 12th Avenue and a widened full-access
interchange at Portland Avenue. This work also included partial trail construction
parallel to I-494 along 78th Street, reconstruction of the Portland Avenue/77th Street
intersection, and reconstruction of portions of 78th Street. Richfield's cost participation
on this project was approximately $3 Million.
Project 2 is a combination of the three remaining Vision projects. The project is
estimated at $297 Million in the 2026-29 Draft State Transportation Improvement
Program, including a $138 Million INFRA Grant from the USDOT in October 2024, and
the remaining portion of a $134 Million 2018 Corridors of Commerce grant for the E-
ZPass Lanes. The grant funding, along with other MnDOT funds, are expected to cover
nearly all the costs of Project 2.
MnDOT requested municipal consent from the City on Friday, August 29, 2025. A public
hearing was held at the Regular City Council Meeting on Tuesday, October 28, 2025.
On January 13, 2026, the City Council passed a resolution disapproving the layout,
requesting safety improvements at the 76th Street and I-35W interchange. That
resolution (Resolution No. 12397) will be repealed by the resolution being considered at
this meeting.
All materials related to this item, including a staff analysis of the City Council's Regional
Project Evaluation Framework and the current project layout, can be found in the
January 13, 2026 Council packet.
EQUITABLE OR STRATEGIC CONSIDERATIONS OR IMPACTS
Full Vision
Equity: The full buildout is expected to reduce congestion in south Richfield, decrease
traffic along Nicollet Avenue and 12th Avenue, calm traffic on 78th Street between
Chicago Avenue and 12th Avenue by removing through access to Portland Avenue,
create improved pedestrian facilities on reconstructed freeway bridges for Nicollet
Avenue, Portland Avenue, and 12th Avenue, and create a new pedestrian connection
over I-494 at Chicago Avenue. The project, taken as a whole, is expected to improve
both motorized and non-motorized transportation options in the City, which should result
in reduced transportation-related delay and costs.
Strategic Goals: The full Vision partially supports City infrastructure supports service
needs and Climate resilience is a priority goals with the construction of the new non-
motorized bridge over I-494 at Chicago Avenue, new ped/bike facilities along 78th
Street and across I-494, reduced traffic on 12th Avenue, and the City not taking
ownership of the reconstructed or new bridges over I-494. This new infrastructure does
require additional maintenance, which may not support the service needs goal. The
expanded freeway is expected to generate more traffic, which will increase greenhouse
Page 69 of 83

[PAGE 76]
gas emissions in the corridor, which would not support the climate resilience goal.
Project 2
Equity: Project 2, taken alone, is expected to increase tailpipe emissions and tire-wear
particulate matter, worsening air quality in the short term in the two historically
disadvantaged Census tracts of the City. While MnDOT does expect that technological
innovations will drastically reduce particulate matter along freeways by 2050, these
reductions would not be due to the construction project. There is expected to be a short
term reduction in travel times along the I-494 corridor as a result of the project, which
may lead to less time delay for residents traveling along the corridor and reduce other
emission types.
Strategic Goals: Project 2 supports City infrastructure supports service needs and
sustainable infrastructure financing. The project does not require significant City cost
participation, and is expected to reduce congestion in the short term on roads in
Richfield. Project 2 does not support Climate resilience is a priority, since an expanded
I-494 is expected to attract more vehicles, which will create more greenhouse gas
emissions in the short term. Additionally, Project 2 (and the full Vision) do not address
stormwater capacity and flooding concerns in southeast Richfield, which would require
upsizing of pipes within the I-494 corridor to meaningfully address.
POLICIES (RESOLUTIONS, ORDINANCES, REGULATIONS, STATUTES, ETC.)
• The Municipal Consent process is defined in Minnesota Statutes, sections
161.162 to 161.167.
• The City Council created the Regional Project Evaluation Framework in 2023 to
evaluate the impact of projects like this on the community. An analysis of each
category was included as an attachment to the January 13, 2026 Council packet.
CRITICAL TIMING ISSUES
MnDOT is seeking a resolution to the municipal consent process as soon as feasible, in
order to maintain the project approval schedule and bid the project in the fall of 2026.
FINANCIAL IMPACT
• Richfield's expected cost participation in Project 2 is approximately $9,000.
• Additional costs may be incurred to construct elective items, such as local utility
improvements or local lighting features at 100% city cost.
LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS
A Public Hearing was held on October 28, 2025. Legal notice of the Public Hearing was
published in the Sun Current newspaper on September 25, 2025 and October 23, 2025.
ALTERNATIVE RECOMMENDATION(S)
None.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Resolution Project 494 MC 2026 v3
Page 70 of 83

[PAGE 77]
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION PROVIDING MUNICIPAL CONSENT TO THE MINNESOTA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FOR THE I-494 CORRIDOR VISION PROJECT
2 PROPOSED FINAL LAYOUT (SP 2785-462)
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Richfield is the official governing body of
the City of Richfield, Minnesota; and
WHEREAS, the Minnesota Department of Transportation (“MnDOT”) is developing a
project (the “Project”) to construct Project 2 of the I-494 Corridor Vision. Project 2 of the I-
494 Corridor Vision will construct an E-ZPass lane on I-494 between I-35W and 24th
Avenue, reconstruct pavement on I-35W between American Boulevard and 75th Street,
reconstruct the railroad bridge at Pleasant Avenue, reconstruct 78th Street east of 12th
Avenue, reconstruct the I-494/Highway 77 interchange, and perform bridge deck
rehabilitation on the Lyndale Avenue bridge over I-494, construct ADA improvements on the
impacted local system, construct drainage system improvements, and construct utility
relocations; and
WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes Section 161.164 provides, “Before proceeding with
the construction, reconstruction, or improvement of any route on the trunk highway system
lying within any municipality, the commissioner [of transportation] shall submit to its
governing body a final layout and project report covering the purpose, route location, and
proposed design of the highway... [which] must include a good-faith cost estimate of all the
costs in which the governing body is expected to participate... The governing body shall,
within 60 days of receiving a final layout from the commissioner, conduct a public hearing at
which the Department of Transportation shall present the final layout for the project... Within
90 days from the date of the public hearing, the governing body shall approve or disapprove
the final layout in writing…”; and
WHEREAS, the Project will deliver the remaining elements of the I-494 Corridor
Vision so the whole benefits of the project can be fully realized: A) reduce traffic congestion
and improve reliability of average rush hour trip, B) improve safety for all modes, C) provide
a transit advantage to increase the number of people who can be efficiently moved through
the area, D) restore pavement to preserve infrastructure and provide a smoother ride, E)
preserve existing bridges, F) improve drainage systems to reduce localized flooding and
reduce run-off into the Minnesota River, and G) improve connectivity for pedestrians and
bicyclists crossing I-494; and
WHEREAS, on August 29, 2025, MnDOT submitted the proposed Final Layout and
other supportive materials and data to the City and requested the City’s consent to and
approval of the proposed Final Layout pursuant to the provisions of Minnesota Statutes
Section 161.164; and
WHEREAS, the Project is proposed to be administered by MnDOT via the design-
build project delivery method, with the contract anticipated to be let in October 2026; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of Minnesota Statutes Section 161.164, the
City scheduled a public hearing, conducted a public hearing, provided at least 30-days’
Page 71 of 83

[PAGE 78]
notice of the public hearing and took action within 90 days from the date of the public hearing
to approve or disapprove the proposed Final Layout by resolution; and
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, officials of the Minnesota Department of
Transportation presented plans for review and responded to questions, and the City Council
received comments regarding these plans from the public and City staff and considered all
the materials and testimony which had been presented.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Richfield
repeals Resolution No. 12397 and approves the plans and proposed Final Layout submitted
by the Minnesota Department of Transportation on August 29, 2025 and presented at the
October 28, 2025 public hearing, and will cooperate with MnDOT for the successful
construction of this Project.
Adopted by the City Council of the City of Richfield, Minnesota this 10th day of March, 2026.
Mary B. Supple, Mayor
ATTEST:
Michelle Friedrich, City Clerk
Page 72 of 83

[PAGE 79]
City Council Meeting 3/10/2026
Agenda Section: Other Business
Agenda Item: 12.a.
Report Prepared By:
Lynnette Chambers, Housing Program Administrator
Department Director:
Melissa Poehlman, Community Development Director
Item for Consideration:
Consider approval of allocation of awards and agreements for services with the
recommended non-profit organizations and authorize the Mayor and City
Manager to execute agreements for services between the City of Richfield and the
non-profit organizations.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
In November 2025, staff distributed a Request for Proposals for Social Services to non-
profit agencies serving the City of Richfield for services to be provided in 2026. The
2026 City Budget includes funding for organizations that provide social services that are
deemed to be of public benefit to the City and the community in general. The 2026
Budget includes $97,584 for this purpose. A total of seven proposals were received
from the following organizations:
• Reach for Resources
• VEAP
• Senior Community Services
• Loaves and Fishes
• The Family Partnership
• The Cornerstone Group
• Youable
The proposals represent a wide variety of social services offered to Richfield residents.
The organizations requested a total amount of $118,396 exceeding the City's available
funding by $20,812.
One Richfield resident and three staff members comprised the committee that reviewed
the proposals and made funding recommendations. The review committee's
recommendations took into account the type of service(s) to be provided, the target
population(s) to be served, and past performance of the social service agency. All
seven proposals were recommended for funding.
Page 73 of 83

[PAGE 80]
The following table details the review committee's recommendations:
Applicant 2026 Funding 2026 Funding
Request Awarded
Reach for Resources (formerly known as $5,500 $4,000
TRAIL)
VEAP $30,000 $30,000
Senior Community Services $10,000 $10,000
Loaves and Fishes $10,000 $8,500
The Family Partnership $30,000 $12,188
Cornerstone $22,896 $22,896
Youable $10,000 $10,000
Total Funding $118,396 $97,584
A complete overview of all services to be provided by the various organizations is
attached.
RECOMMENDED ACTION
By motion: Approve allocation of awards and agreements for services with the
recommended non-profit organizations and authorize the Mayor and City
Manager to execute agreements for services between the City of Richfield and the
non-profit organizations.
HISTORICAL CONTEXT
The City of Richfield has historically allocated funds on an annual basis to social service
agencies serving the Richfield community.
The City is not authorized to provide grant funding to social service agencies. However,
the City can enter into Agreements for services with agencies for specific services that
are compatible with City activities.
The 2026 recommendations are based on the following criteria:
• Demonstrated need for the proposed service for the targeted population;
• Compatibility with City functions/activities;
• Partnership and/or assistance with various City services (e.g., public safety);
• Efforts to serve low-income persons of all races/cultures/ethnicity;
• Demonstrated value to the community;
• Past performance;
• Cost of services and number of persons served; and
• Certified non-profit agency.
The following chart provides a recent history of social service funding:
2024 Funding 2025 Funding 2026
Recommended
Reach for Resources $4,500 $4,500 $4,000
Page 74 of 83

[PAGE 81]
VEAP $25,000 $25,000 $30,000
Senior Community Services $10,000 $10,500 $10,000
Loaves and Fishes $8,000 $8,000 $8,500
The Family Partnership $12,600 $12,600 $12,188
Cornerstone $18,000 $21,200 $22,896
Youable N/A $10,000 $10,000
Total $78,100 $91,800 $97,584
EQUITABLE OR STRATEGIC CONSIDERATIONS OR IMPACTS
The request for proposals sought organizations serving persons of all
races/cultures/ethnicity with low incomes. The services include food, advocacy, mental
health counseling, transportation for people with disabilities, and support for seniors with
limited resources. The services are focused on people in need and can help to reduce
racial inequities and barriers for traditionally excluded groups.
POLICIES (RESOLUTIONS, ORDINANCES, REGULATIONS, STATUTES, ETC.)
The City partners with other agencies as warranted and practical to assist in the delivery
of services to City residents.
CRITICAL TIMING ISSUES
Services are to be provided in the calendar year 2026.
FINANCIAL IMPACT
• A 2026 allocation of $97,584 is budgeted for social services.
• The amount of funding recommended for each agency is commensurate with the
type and scope of service provided and the number of residents served.
• The amount requested exceeded the City’s available funding by $20,812.
LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS
• The City does not have the authority to make grants or donate funds to agencies
but is able to enter into contracts for services with agencies to conduct activities
the City is authorized to provide. The expenditure of public funds must meet two
requirements: 1) there must be a public purpose for the expenditure; and 2) there
must be either specific or implied authority for the expenditure in state statues or
the City's charter.
• The City Attorney approved the form of the Agreement.
ALTERNATIVE RECOMMENDATION(S)
• Approve the recommendations with revised allocations.
• Do not approve the recommendations.
ATTACHMENTS
1. CITY OF RICHFIELD REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS 2026
Page 75 of 83

[PAGE 82]
2. 031026_2026 Social Service Agencies and Services Provided
Page 76 of 83

[PAGE 83]
CITY OF RICHFIELD
REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR
SOCIAL SERVICES
2026
The City of Richfield is seeking proposals for social services from non-profit agencies
serving the City of Richfield. Funding parameters and priority goals for the purpose of
making the best use of funds are as follows:
Funding Parameters
• Any non-profit organization is eligible to apply.
• Projects must serve Richfield residents.
• Services must be compatible with City functions and activities.
Priority Goals
The goal of the social services funding is to facilitate services to residents with lower
incomes to ensure that Richfield is a community where all residents can thrive. Projects
must address at least one of the following areas:
• Food insecurity
• Housing stability
• Mental health
• Personal safety
• Services for people with disabilities
Award Criteria
Proposals must meet one or more of the following criteria:
• Demonstrated need of the proposed service for the targeted population.
• Compatibility with City functions/activities.
• Partnership and/or assistance with various City services (i.e., public safety).
• Efforts to serve low-income persons of all races/cultures/ethnicities.
• Demonstrated value to the community.
• Certified Non-Profit agency.
Proposal’s must be submitted by 4:30 p.m. January 9, 2026
LATE PROPOSALS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED
Page 77 of 83

[PAGE 84]
Proposals must be submitted by 4:30 p.m. January 9, 2026
LATE PROPOSALS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED
PROPOSAL SUBMISSION INSTRUCTIONS
The information requested in the attached Request for Proposals must be addressed in
your proposal.
Submit 1 electronic copy (word or pdf) of your agencies proposal by 4:30 p.m.
January 9, 2026 (LATE PROPOSALS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED) to:
Lynnette Chambers
City of Richfield
6700 Portland Avenue
Richfield, MN 55423
lchambers@richfieldmn.gov
Applicants may be asked to respond in writing to additional questions. The Richfield
City Council will tentatively award contracts for services in March 2026.
Agencies awarded contracts will be required to sign a service agreement for
calendar year 2026 and submit semi-annual reports on service outcomes and
number of people served.
Please contact Lynnette Chambers at 612-861-9773 or
lchambers@richfieldmn.gov with any questions.
Proposals must be submitted by 4:30 p.m. January 9, 2026
LATE PROPOSALS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED
Page 78 of 83

[PAGE 85]
CITY OF RICHFIELD
2026 REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR SOCIAL SERVICE ASSISTANCE
Proposals for social services must include the following:
PROPOSAL HEADING
1. Agency name, address, contact person, and phone/fax/email
2. Amount of request
3. Brief description of service(s) provided
4. Identify priority area(s) you are addressing:
• Food insecurity
• Housing stability
• Mental health
• Personal safety
• Services for people with disabilities
5. Explain how the services you are proposing to provide will benefit the City of
Richfield.
6. Explain any formal or informal partnership you have with the City of Richfield (i.e.,
assisting Public Safety through the services you provide, etc.)
ADMINISTRATION
1. Provide a mission statement for your agency.
2. Provide verification of your organization’s non-profit legal status.
3. Indicate your total agency budget for 2026.
4. Indicate your proposed project budget for 2026. Itemize proposed expenses and
describe as applicable. Indicate both proposed City funds and other funds to
support the project.
PROGRAM
1. Describe service to be funded, including:
a) Brief statement detailing the service and how it is provided
b) Target population(s); estimated number of unduplicated individuals you plan to
serve residing in the City of Richfield
c) Eligibility criteria and process
d) How clients are involved in the planning process for service
e) Desired client outcomes and methods of evaluating and measuring client
progress (use attached “Proposed Outcome/Evaluation Methods” form)
3. Demonstrate the need for the proposed service.
4. Describe outreach efforts to target populations, including immigrant and low-income
individuals.
Please contact Lynnette Chambers at 612-861-9773 or
lchambers@richfieldmn.gov with any questions.
Proposals must be submitted by 4:30 p.m. January 9, 2026
LATE PROPOSALS WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED
Page 79 of 83

[PAGE 86]
City of Richfield Social Service Programs - 2026 Outcomes
Name of Applicant Organization:
Address:
Contact Person:
Phone: Email:
Brief description of service(s):
Outcomes: State 3 to 5 measurable outcomes of proposed service(s) – relate
outcomes to client progress # Served (?)
Outcomes indicate what result, benefit, or change would come from the service provided. Outcomes can
be: 1) initial, such as increased knowledge, understanding, or skills; 2) intermediate, such as change in a
specific behavior or attitude; or 3) long term, such as a change in the condition or status of people.
Page 80 of 83

[PAGE 87]
2026 Social Service Agencies and Services Provided
Social Service Name Description of services provided
Cornerstone Funding will support Cornerstone’s continuum of services. Cornerstone provides
comprehensive services for Richfield residents who have experienced domestic
violence, sexual violence, human trafficking and general crime.
VEAP The primary purpose of VEAP's Social Service program is to stabilize housing,
prevent eviction and homelessness, and create a pathway to housing stability
for low-income individuals, seniors, youth (18-24), and families living in the
Richfield community. VEAP strives to do this by providing food, financial and
supportive services that increase access to healthy food and stable housing,
minimizing or preventing crises, and increasing participant resourcefulness.
The Family Partnership The Family Partnership's School-Linked Mental Health program provides one-to-
one mental health therapy co-located within Richfield Public Schools. The Family
Partnership acts as a mental health resource for school staff, students, and
parents, providing referrals as well as vital information on mental health. The
Family Partnership is currently in Richfield STEM Elementary School, RDLS
Elementary, Richfield Senior High and Richfield Pre-K programs, as well as
PICA/HeadStart in the Richfield area.
Youable Emotional Youable partners with Hennepin County on programs for youth and families.
Health Services The Infant Home Visiting program provides support to parents and caregivers to
help promote appropriate development and healthy relationships. The Parent
Support Outreach program is a short-term, early intervention program that
connects families with help to meet urgent needs and provides support for basic
needs, financial needs, and health and chemical dependency concerns. Youable
also offers case management services for children aged 3 to 17 in Hennepin
County, with culturally specific support to Spanish- and Somali-speaking clients.
It connects families to resources, services, and opportunities to help children
who have mental health issues that affect their ability to function at home, in
school, or in the community and successfully manage their mental health in
daily life.
Reach for Resources - Funding will support transportation to 135 Richfield Adaptive Recreation (AR &
formerly TRAIL LE) programs.
Senior Community The Senior Outreach & Caregiver Services program provides personalized
Services service coordination and supportive counseling to help older Richfield residents
at risk maintain their independence. Through comprehensive assessments,
resource connections, and ongoing guidance, the program ensures seniors
receive the care they need to thrive and maintain their independence. These
services extend to family caregivers. By offering practical support, stress
management strategies, and tools for balance, the program empowers
caregivers to cope effectively with the challenges of their role, while assisting
their older adults to live independently with dignity.
Loaves and Fishes Loaves and Fishes offer free, healthy meals at over 25 Community Meal Sites
across Minnesota including one Community Meal Site in Richfield. Loaves and
Fishes’ objective is to alleviate hunger and food insecurity while sourcing food
responsibly and sustainably.
Page 81 of 83

[PAGE 88]
City Council Meeting 3/10/2026
Agenda Section: Other Business
Agenda Item: 12.b.
Report Prepared By:
Mark McKinley, Administrative Assistant
Department Director:
Katie Rodriguez, City Manager
Item for Consideration:
Consideration of alternate appointment to fill vacancy on Advisory Board of
Health.
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Maintaining a full commission roster allows for a diverse range of perspectives to be
shared during each commission meeting. Maintaining a full roster allows for more
flexibility in instances where a quorum is needed to conduct official business.
RECOMMENDED ACTION
By Motion: Approve the appointment of Jacob Pederson as Advisory Board of
Health Commissioner commencing on March 10, 2026 and expiring January 31,
2027.
HISTORICAL CONTEXT
City advisory board and commissions were established by City ordinance or resolution.
EQUITABLE OR STRATEGIC CONSIDERATIONS OR IMPACTS
It is advisable to appoint a replacement to ensure quorum at meetings.
POLICIES (RESOLUTIONS, ORDINANCES, REGULATIONS, STATUTES, ETC.)
None
CRITICAL TIMING ISSUES
None
FINANCIAL IMPACT
None
LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS
ALTERNATIVE RECOMMENDATION(S)
Page 82 of 83

[PAGE 89]
ATTACHMENTS
None
Page 83 of 83