[PAGE 1]
RANDOLPH COUNTY
PLANNING AND ZONING
204 E Academy Street, Asheboro NC 27203 (336) 318-6555
RANDOLPH COUNTY PLANNING BOARD
AGENDA
NOVEMBER 4, 2025
1. Call to Order of the Randolph County Planning Board.
2. Consent Agenda:
● Approval of agenda for the November 4, 2025, Planning Board meeting.
● Approval of the minutes from the October 7, 2025, Planning Board and
Zoning Board of Adjustment meeting.
● Approval of the 2026 Planning Board meeting schedule.
3. Conflict of Interest:
● Are there any Conflicts of Interest or ex parte communication that should be
disclosed? (If there is a Conflict of Interest, the Board must vote to allow the
member with the Conflict of Interest to not participate in the hearing of the
specific case where the Conflict of Interest has been identified.)
4. Old Business.
5. New Business.
SPECIAL USE PERMIT REQUEST #2025-00022026
The Randolph County Planning Board will hold a duly published and notified
quasi-judicial hearing on the request by JUSTIN JAMES, Climax, NC, and
their request to obtain a Special Use Permit at 3566 Old Red Cross Rd,
Providence Township, Sandy Creek Balance Watershed, Tax ID
#7797891516, .94 acres, RA - Residential Agricultural District. The applicant
desires to obtain a Special Use Permit to specifically allow a gunsmithing
business.
REZONING REQUEST #2025-00022027
The Randolph County Planning Board will hold a duly published and notified
legislative hearing on the request by CAROLINA TRAVEL MANAGEMENT,
Planning Board November 4, 2025 Page 1 of 2
Page 1 of 39

[PAGE 2]
INC, Randleman, NC, and their request to rezone 54.80 acres out of 65.71
acres on the corner of US Hwy 220 Bus N and Holder Inman Rd Ext, Level
Cross Township, Randleman Lake Protected Area Watershed and
Randleman Lake Critical Area Watershed, Tax ID #7757787799, Primary
Growth Area, from RA - Residential Agricultural District to LI - Light
Industrial District. It is the desire of the applicant to rezone the property to
allow any uses allowed by right in the LI - Light Industrial District.
6. Update from the Planning Director/Assistant County Manager.
7. Adjournment.
Planning Board November 4, 2025 Page 2 of 2
Page 2 of 39

[PAGE 3]
October 7, 2025
1. Call to Order of the Randolph County Planning Board.
There was a meeting of the Randolph County Planning Board on October 7, 2025, at
6:00 PM in the 1909 Historic Courthouse Meeting Room, 145-C Worth St, Asheboro,
NC. Chairman Pell called the meeting to order and welcomed those in attendance. Pell
reminded those in attendance that the Planning Board Rules of Procedure state that
anyone wishing to speak must sign up to speak and that speakers other than the
T
applicant are limited to three minutes.
2. Roll call of the Board members. (Completed by staff.)
The County Planning staff completed the roFll call of the members of the Planning Board
as they arrived at the meeting. Reid Pell, John Cable, Reggie Beeson, Ken Austin,
Brandon Hedrick, Susan Thompson, and Nicholas Mooney were present. Kemp Davis
was absent. Alternate member Steven Maness was also present for the meeting.
Assistant County Manager William Johnson was present, and County Attorney Ben
A
Morgan was also present, along with County Planning staff members Kayla Brown,
Melissa Burkhart, David Harris, Kim Heinzer, Tim Mangum, and Janet Moreno.
3. Consent Agenda:
● ApproRval of agenda for the October 7, 2025, Planning Board meeting.
● Approval of the minutes from the September 9, 2025, Planning Board
meeting.
On the motion of Cable, seconded by Austin, the Planning Board voted 7-0 to
D
approve the Consent Agenda as presented in the agenda packet.
4. Conflict of Interest:
● Are there any Conflicts of Interest or ex parte communication that should be
disclosed? (If there is a Conflict of Interest, the Board must vote to allow the
member with the Conflict of Interest to not participate in the hearing of the
specific case where the Conflict of Interest has been identified.)
There were no Conflicts of Interest or ex parte communication identified by any
Planning Board member.
5. Old Business.
There was no old business for the Planning Board to consider.
6. New Business.
Page 1 of 3 10/7/2025
Page 3 of 39

[PAGE 4]
REZONING REQUEST #2025-00022022
The Randolph County Planning Board will hold a duly published and notified
legislative hearing on the request by RODNEY FERGUSON, Staley, NC,
and their request to rezone 23.70-acres on Whites Chapel Rd, Columbia
Township, Sandy Creek Balance Watershed, Tax ID #8714731586 and
#8714638166, Rural Growth Area and Secondary Growth Area, from RA -
Residential Agricultural District to CVOM-CD - CTonventional Subdivision
Overlay Mixed - Conditional District. The proposed Conditional Zoning
District would specifically allow the division of an existing lot into two
additional lots, thereby creating a major subdivision for Class
B manufactured homes and above, as per the site plan.
F
Johnson presented the rezoning request of Rodney Ferguson, Staley, NC, to the
Planning Board.
A
Pell opened the public hearing.
The applicant was not present for the public hearing, so the Planning Board
adjourned at 6:02 pm and went to the agenda for the Zoning Board of Adjustment.
R
After completing the Zoning Board of Adjustment agenda, the Planning Board asked
if the applicant for the rezoning was present, and Ferguson was present at this time.
The Planning Board reopened the rezoning public hearing at 6:36 PM.
D
Ferguson explained how he had built his house on a five-acre parcel and then
bought adjacent land and sold those parcels off as separate tracts.
Morgan explained to the Planning Board that, due to Ferguson selling the previous
two lots, this request is now considered a major subdivision per the Randolph
County Unified Development Ordinance (UDO).
Pell asked if the Planning Board had any questions.
Hearing none, Pell closed the public hearing.
Hedrick stated that the plat, as presented, meets all the requirements of the UDO.
Beeson said that the lots had plenty of State road frontage.
Mooney asked about access to the remaining fifteen acres, and Ferguson said that
there was an easement shown on the plat.
Cable said he saw no issue with the request, and there was no opposition at the
Page 2 of 3 10/7/2025
Page 4 of 39

[PAGE 5]
public hearing.
On the motion of Cable, seconded by Beeson, with a vote of 7-0, the Planning Board
voted to approve the request with the motions contained in the Planning Board
agenda packet.
Pell reminded Ferguson about the fifteen-day waiting period for any potential
appeals.
T
7. Update from the Interim Planning Director/Assistant County Manager.
Johnson told the Planning Board that he had a few items that he wanted to share with
the Planning Board.
F
Johnson told the Planning Board that proposed sign updates were tabled by the Board
of County Commissioners until their November 2025 meeting due to Chairman Frye
being absent from the meeting.
A
Johnson also told the Planning Board about the reclassification of the GIS Planner to a
Senior Planner Position and which had been approved by the Board of County
Commissioners at the meeting on October 6, 2025.
R
Johnson also announced that, along with County Manager Holden, they were pleased
to announce that Kim Heinzer would be the new Planning Director effective October 16,
2025. The Planning Board clapped in approval of the appointment.
Heinzer asked the Planning Board about possible online training that the County could
D
purchase. She mentioned that the Planning Board could meet early to review the
videos and then discuss the content of the videos.
Morgan, along with several Planning Board members, said they thought the training
would be a great idea and would help the Board fulfill its duties.
8. Adjournment.
Having no further business, on the motion of Hedrick, seconded by Beeson, the
Planning Board voted 7-0 to adjourn at 06:43 PM.
________________________________
Chairman
________________________________
Clerk to the Planning Board
Page 3 of 3 10/7/2025
Page 5 of 39

[PAGE 6]
October 7, 2025
1. Call to Order of the Randolph County Zoning Board of Adjustment.
There was a meeting of the Randolph County Zoning Board of Adjustment on October
7, 2025, at 6:03 PM in the 1909 Historic Courthouse Meeting Room, 145-C Worth St,
Asheboro, NC. Chairman Pell called the meeting to order and welcomed those in
attendance. Pell reminded those in attendance that the Planning Board Rules of
Procedure state that anyone wishing to speak must sign up to speak and that speakers
T
other than the applicant are limited to three minutes.
2. Roll call of the Board members. (Completed by staff.)
The County Planning staff completed the roFll call of the members of the Zoning Board
of Adjustment as they arrived at the meeting. Reid Pell, John Cable, Reggie Beeson,
Ken Austin, Brandon Hedrick, Susan Thompson, and Nicholas Mooney were present.
Kemp Davis was absent. Alternate member Steven Maness was also present for the
meeting. Assistant County Manager William Johnson was present, and County Attorney
A
Ben Morgan was also present, along with County Planning staff members Kayla Brown,
Melissa Burkhart, David Harris, Kim Heinzer, Tim Mangum, and Janet Moreno.
3. Consent Agenda:
● ApproRval of agenda for the October 7, 2025, Zoning Board of Adjustment
meeting.
On the motion of Cable, seconded by Austin, the Zoning Board of Adjustment voted 7-0
to approve the Consent Agenda as presented in the agenda packet.
D
4. Conflict of Interest:
● Are there any Conflicts of Interest or ex parte communication that should be
disclosed? (If there is a Conflict of Interest, the Board must vote to allow the
member with the Conflict of Interest to not participate in the hearing of the
specific case where the Conflict of Interest has been identified.)
There were no Conflicts of Interest or ex parte communication identified by any Zoning
Board of Adjustment member.
5. Old Business.
There was no old business for the Zoning Board of Adjustment to consider.
6. New Business.
VARIANCE REQUEST 2025-00022025
Page 1 of 5 10/7/2025
Page 6 of 39

[PAGE 7]
The Randolph County Zoning Board of Adjustment will hold a duly published
and notified quasi-judicial hearing on the Variance requested by CODY
RICHARDSON, Sophia, NC, to use the property located at 2976 Shawnee
Trl, Back Creek Township, Tax ID #7734460978, 4.45 acres, RA -
Residential Agricultural District in a way not permissible under the literal
terms of the Randolph County Unified Ordinance. The applicant desires to
obtain a Variance to specifically allow changing the front yard setback to 28
ft. from the right-of-way, in lieu of the 35 ft. setbaTck required by Section 631
of the Randolph County Unified Development Ordinance.
Johnson presented the variance request of Cody Richardson, Sophia, NC, to the
Zoning Board of Adjustment.
F
Pell opened the public hearing.
Morgan administered the oath to Cody Richardson, the applicant.
A
C. Richardson told the Board that he has been trying to get into the new house since
early August and that Clayton Homes had called him to inform him of a possible
setback issue on the property. C. Richardson stated that he had contacted the
Planning Department about the setback and was told that the home had to be thirty-
R
five feet from the right-of-way, and C. Richardson stated that the zoning permit does
list the thirty-five-foot setback from any roads. C. Richardson stated that he
measured the road from the center of Shawnee Trail, and it was fifty-eight feet to his
house.
CD. Richardson testified that he was given different information on where and how to
measure the right-of-way and that they thought we was okay until he called the North
Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT) and they told him that Shawnee
Trail has a sixty-foot right-of-way with thirty feet on each side.
C. Richardson submitted into evidence a petition (Exhibit 1) and a letter from an
adjoining property owner (Exhibit 2) in support of his Variance request.
C. Richardson testified that Shawnee Trail would probably never be widened, as the
road is for the community, and that it is a State-maintained road.
Hedrick stated that it sounded like the house was going to meet the NCDOT setback,
and C. Richardson said the home would meet the NCDOT setback, but it was the
setback from the Randolph County Unified Development Ordinance (UDO) that was
causing the issue.
Austin asked if Shawnee Trail is a dead-end road and how far past the proposed
residence the road continued. C. Richardson stated that Shawnee Trail dead-ends
approximately 150 yards past his proposed residence. C. Richardson also
Page 2 of 5 10/7/2025
Page 7 of 39

[PAGE 8]
referenced the pictures in the agenda packet.
Cable asked C. Richardson if he had done most of the work himself and if he had
asked for help on the setbacks. C. Richardson said that he had done most of the
work himself with help from family members and that Clayton Homes was also
involved in the construction. C. Richardson stated that he did know about the
setbacks, but did not know the exact width of the right-of-way or where to measure
the width of the right-of-way. C. Richardson stated that he tried to use the largest
amount of setback to prevent any problems. T
Hedrick asked C. Richardson if he measured from the middle of the road or if he
found any marker, and C. Richardson replied that he measured from the seam in the
road and that, based on that measurement, the front corner of the proposed house is
F
fifty-eight feet from the seam in the road.
Hedrick asked C. Richardson if the pavement of Shawnee Trail had ever moved, and
C. Richardson said that he did not know, but that he had talked to NCDOT, and they
A
do not know when Shawnee Trail became a State-maintained road.
Cable asked when Shawnee Trail was originally laid out and paved, and C.
Richardson replied that he did not know.
R
C. Richardson stated that the proposed house has not been set on the property, but
that the footers have been dug.
Austin asked about the location of the well and septic system. C. Richardson stated
that the well is approximately forty feet behind the house, and the septic system is
D
beside the proposed house location.
Cable asked C. Richardson if this was his first house, and C. Richardson said it was
and that he would not make this mistake again.
Morgan asked for the people in support of the request to stand, and everyone at the
meeting stood. C. Richardson said that the people at the meeting are his neighbors.
Austin asked when is house was scheduled to be set, and C. Richardson said it
depended on the answer from the Zoning Board of Adjustment.
Pell asked if there were any questions from the Zoning Board of Adjustment.
Beeson said that he is familiar with the location and traffic on the road and that there
is no traffic on Shawnee Trail.
Morgan administered the oath to Tracy Runyon, 2920 Shawnee Trail. Runyon stated
that he was not opposed to the Variance request.
Page 3 of 5 10/7/2025
Page 8 of 39

[PAGE 9]
Morgan administered the oath to Jade Whiteheart, 3041 Shawnee Trail, and she
stated that she lives at the end of Shawnee Trail in the cul-de-sac.
Morgan administered the oath to C. Richardson’s mother, and she stated that C.
Richardson had worked for many months to get everything ready and that the
proposed home would not impact other people. She stated that everyone present
was neighbors and that no one was upset with the proposed residence.
Cable said that it seems that most everyone presentT is in support of the request, and
for the purposes of time, he requested that those in attendance present any
evidence that has not already been presented.
Morgan asked if there was anyone present in opposition to the request.
F
Morgan administered the oath to Amanda McGee, 2967 Shawnee Trail, and she
stated that she lives across the road from this house, and it is possible that the road
could have shifted at some point, and that she wanted to see C. Richardson be able
A
to put his home on this property.
Morgan administered the oath to Brian Richardson, 3016 Shawnee Trail, and he said
that he was the applicant's father and that he worked for APAC when Shawnee Trail
was originally paved, and that there was a junction box along the road that was too
R
close, and they had to move Shawnee Trail to get the road paved. B. Richardson
said that he would appreciate anything that the Zoning Board of Adjustment could do
to help his son.
Pell asked if there were any other questions from the Zoning Board of Adjustment.
D
Cable asked C. Richardson if denying the Variance would create an undue financial
hardship. C. Richardson stated that denying the request would cause a "major"
hardship and that he would probably not be able to finish the construction.
Mooney asked if anyone could confirm the NCDOT right-of-way. Hedrick replied that
the question is about the setback and not Shawnee Trail.
Pell asked if there were any other questions from the Zoning Board of Adjustment.
Hearing none, Pell closed the public hearing.
Cable stated that this request is a classic example of doing what is best and right,
and he felt that if the Variance was denied, it would be more of a hardship on the
applicant.
Hedrick stated that Variance decisions are tough as the applicant cannot create
hardship per the North Carolina General Statutes. Hedrick said he thought the
applicant had not created his own hardship, and he used available resources and
Page 4 of 5 10/7/2025
Page 9 of 39

[PAGE 10]
acted in good faith.
Austin stated that this request is a perfect example of why we have Variances in the
UDO.
On the motion of Austin, seconded by Hedrick, with a vote of 7-0, the Zoning Board
of Adjustment voted to approve the request with the motions contained in the Zoning
Board of Adjustment agenda packet.
T
7. Adjournment.
Having no further business, on the motion of Beeson, seconded by Cable, the Zoning
Board of Adjustment voted 7-0 to adjourn at 06:35 AM.
F
________________________________
Chairman A
________________________________
Clerk to the Board
R
D
Page 5 of 5 10/7/2025
Page 10 of 39

[PAGE 11]
Pllnilg e.td Zoiint
\/brtnc. PuUb H.eftE
To tlhoan lt May Co.loaan,
lrr'b. tts lrl&.llgncd ne0hbo$ of cody Ri$ardlon al 2078 Showtroe TrEil, a.B wriltl9 h
sr.lppod ol lh€k vanance adr'udngrn'lBqu€ct
Our mbhboihood, locat d sboC Shaxncr Trril, conllll. ot.d# r6d urd nlfal
Iu*r€otal prop6r0€.. M.ny pllportba bordtr tl6 cr€ot. end pordona ol hnd h t{3 .roa .l! ln
a iloodzono. Vlb bdisv€ llt l.qualH vetuncewillnol nogalively atHthE darecl€.o,the
,r.tthbofiood, rror.lly veelt, ffic, d lh. wsdl lahy d tto ooirrUnny.
Furlhomlor€, d€nyiilg tha r€qu&t rculd pla6 an undlG herdarrip m lhc homeowneG !t no
ibufi ot tleir own. \ J. ihi. i! a rE63on bb adju.drrnt, and m.ncoulgg€ th. Doant b
comirorth€ udquo d't6s€l n}atanc6 of thir properly rtl€n maldnc iL d€cblon.
t a, .. rE*rrbo[. rlgead\tly tr6t fh€ EinEa b. *pr!t .d
'rqd
Th.r* y.rr br yotr llrE dd oo.r.8ddon.
S.ltcqlry,
ldgfao.trood s!Dpo.b.3:
ilrD. (PrbH) Sitn tlt!
5-1Po
),1 <-L
'a
&ratE
pi
Corj L l4**.n Alt"^...-- 2.{ ee
'1'r NL
c\
EIXHIBIT
Page 11 of 39

[PAGE 12]
L4(
0
qodlENJ-fZ-
-
ML >{aifcf\o7
y_llt WQI-U931\ ^.g116\'n'l'N) fli EO
ur." tlr,L gqwralD'
,*J!YY"Y W'4frP
Lt4,
,5(1'v yJ' eltso
?lr.) t/t a,pv2 l-,D
doF )zo)n,
aou a)o a"sa,9 s odY'd W rAEge
d9t yro>47
}rlt
\rrrx'r)/, '
.Qla-lt -J,
W?f'SS? l-lb6u Wl4rop:at >2JV 1.( ' )'ZLE
rt W
<nq^%tq/ \T@ |\e'rat' a4a
sDclfo ' Yl 7'\tl98
U .Lbtdh 6ttt >t.o .l (6
,"1' -
N) lLz
'o61.',I
^t hos9 aaqre\\? 4t
Ihlt\.All nn\l'> a
r
I w.rf
Hvtzott u:)L'%*- r45o yrz1ttff4
s7zs//
/2al/ur/!w 4€ 6<q[,qdrt
/
Page 12 of 39

[PAGE 13]
Reference
Planning and Zoning
Vanance Public Hearing
2976 Shawnee Trail Sophia, NC
To Vvhom it May Concem,
My name is Kim Themen, ard I live at 3964 Beci(edib Road Sophia NC. My p@perty boarders
Shawnee Trail. I will be a neighbor ol the Ridlardsql's.
I am in tull support of the varianc€ adjustrnent request changing the set back of 2976
Shawnee Trail hom 35 fl lrom the nghlof-way to 28 feel
Shavmee Trail is a dea6end road wth minimal hgmes. Most of the properties border a creek
with portons of the land in a flood zone The variance will not negatively afiect the
neighboripod, property values, faffc or safety of the neighborhood
ln addition. denying the request would place an undue hardship on the Richardson's at no tault
of lhear own. I personally feel lhere was a breakdorvn in tf|e inspedion process, and the issue
should have been ider*ifu and addressed earlier
It is my hope that the board will take these considerations into account f,fien making th€ final
decision.
Thank you foa your time. Please feel tree to cortac{ me if you have any questions or need any
claritication.
Thank you,
Krm Therrlen
3964 Beckerdite Road
Sophia, NC
33&68&,{&t6
1
l
Page 13 of 39

[PAGE 14]
RANDOLPH COUNTY
PLANNING AND ZONING
204 E Academy Street, Asheboro NC 27203 (336) 318-6555
RANDOLPH COUNTY PLANNING BOARD
RANDOLPH COUNTY ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT
MEETING SCHEDULE FOR 2026
January 6, 2026
February 3, 2026
March 3, 2026
April 7, 2026
May 5, 2026
June 2, 2026
July 7, 2026
August 4, 2026
September 8, 2026
October 6, 2026
November 3, 2026
December 8, 2026
The above-listed meetings may be canceled if there are no cases on the agenda.
Additional Randolph County Planning Board or Randolph County Zoning Board of
Adjustment meetings may be scheduled as needed, and the public will be notified as
required by the North Carolina General Statutes.
Meeting dates adopted by the Randolph County Planning Board on ________________.
http://www.randolphcountync.gov
Page 14 of 39

[PAGE 15]
CASE SUMMARY FOR
SPECIAL USE REQUEST #2025-00022026
The Randolph County Planning Board will hold a duly published and notified quasi-
judicial hearing on the request by JUSTIN JAMES, Climax, NC, and their request to
obtain a Special Use Permit at 3566 Old Red Cross Rd, Providence Township, Sandy
Creek Balance Watershed, Tax ID #7797891516, .94 acres, RA - Residential
Agricultural District. The applicant desires to obtain a Special Use Permit to specifically
allow a gunsmithing business.
ALL WITNESSES FOR SPECIAL USE PERMITS MUST BE
SWORN IN BEFORE GIVING TESTIMONY.
Page 15 of 39

[PAGE 16]
OATH FOR QUASI-JUDICIAL HEARINGS
(Special Use Permit Request,
Variances or Appeals)
NORTH CAROLINA RANDOLPH COUNTY
Before opening the public hearing on a case, the
Chair must administer an oath or affirmation to those
wishing to speak on a specific case. (This oath is
specified in NCGS 11-11.)
The Chair should say,
“The Planning Board will now hear testimony for and
against this request. Anyone wishing to testify on this
request must come forward and take the oath. Only
those taking the oath may give testimony for this
request.
“Do you swear, or affirm, that the evidence you shall
give to the Board in this action shall be the truth, the
whole truth, and nothing but the truth, so help you,
God.”
Page 16 of 39

[PAGE 17]
COUNTY OF RANDOLPH
Department of Planning & Development
204 E Academy St - Asheboro NC 27204
SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION
Applicant: JAMES, JUSTIN ROBERT Date: 09/30/2025
Address: 3566 OLD RED CROSS RD.
Parcel #: 7797891516
City, St. Zip: CLIMAX, NC 27233
Permit #: 2025-00022026
Owner: JAMES, JUSTIN ROBERT
Permit Type Code: PZ 3
Address: 6231 WEEPING WILLOW CT
City, St. Zip: PLEASANT GARDEN, NC 27313 Location Address: 3566 OLD RED CROSS RD
CLIMAX, NC 27233
CONTACT Contact Phone: 336 457-5405
JAMES, JUSTIN
NAME:
PARCEL INFORMATION:
Lot number: Subdivsion:
Acreage: 0.9400 Township: 15 - PROVIDENCE
ZONING INFORMATION:
Zoning District 1: RA-RESIDENTIAL AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT
Zoning District 2:
Zoning District 3:
Specialty District: N/A
Watershed Name: SANDY CREEK WATERSHED
Class A Flood Plain On Prop?: NO
Flood Plane Map #: 3710779700J
SPECIAL USE REQUESTED: GUNSMITHING BUSINESS
Total Permit Fee: $250.00
COMMENTS:
The undersigned owner/applicant do hereby make application for a SPECIAL USE PERMIT as required by the
Randolph Couty Zoning Ordinance. By making this application the owner/applicants acknowledge that no work
may be done pursuant to a Special Use Permit issued by the County Planning Board except in accordance with all
conditions that may be imposed by the Board. It is also acknowledged that any restrictions or conditions imposed
shall be binding on the owner/applicants and their successors in interest.
Eric Martin
Authorized County Official Signature of Applicant:
- LOCAL TELEPHONE NUMBER -
Asheboro: (336) 318-6555 - Archdale/Trinity: (336) 819-3565 http://www.randolphcountync.gov
SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION Page: 1 of 1
Page 17 of 39

[PAGE 18]
G
R
E
E
S
O
N
R
T C CI
S T
H
N R T
A Y MI
LI R S
U D S
J
CURTI
RM
D
R
S
S RA
O
R
C
D
E
R
D
L
O
±
James Special Use Request
This property is located in the Sandy Creek Watershed Area
1 inch equals 125 feet
and a Secondary Growth Area.
Application #
2025-00022026
The information contained in this map comes from the best available public data sources. Users should consult the primary data source.
Page 18 of 39

[PAGE 19]
\
\
\
�
�
lv
e
ri
1 dr
c:r
.9
�
0,.
g-
s=
c:::,.
)
�
�
l
"
�
--...
a
�
�
�
.
�
I
l
'
I
)
Justin James ~ Special Use Site Plan
Page 19 of 39

[PAGE 20]
G
R
E
E
S
O
N
R
T C CI
S T
H
N R T
A Y MI
LI R S
U D S
J
CURTI
D
R
S
S
O
R
C
D
E
R
D
L
O
±
James Special Use Request
This property is located in the Sandy Creek Watershed Area
1 inch equals 125 feet
and a Secondary Growth Area.
Application #
2025-00022026
The information contained in this map comes from the best available public data sources. Users should consult the primary data source.
Page 20 of 39

[PAGE 21]
COUNTY OF RANDOLPH
SPECIAL USE PERMIT REMINDERS
A Special Use Permit is a quasi-judicial action designated by the Randolph County
Board of Commissioners to the Randolph County Planning Board. Special Use Permits
only allow the specified use and the Randolph County Planning Board must find the
following findings of fact:
1. The use will not materially endanger the public health or safety if
located where proposed and developed according to the plan as
submitted and approved;
2. The use meets all required conditions and specifications as outlined
in the Randolph County Unified Development Ordinance;
3. The use will not substantially injure the value of adjoining or
abutting property, or that the use is a public necessity; and
4. The location and character of the use if developed according to the
plan as submitted and approved will be in harmony with the area in
which it is to be located and in general conformity with the
Randolph County Unified Development Ordinance.
Only testimony by “expert witnesses” that can prove their status as an expert witness
can be considered by the Planning Board for approving or denying a Special Use
Permit.
In granting the Special Use Permit, the Planning Board may designate only those
conditions as authorized by the North Carolina General Statutes. Any conditions shall
be agreed to by the applicant or property owner in writing before the vote of the
Planning Board for the conditions to be enforceable.
When denying a Special Use Permit, the Board Member making the motion to
deny the request should cite which of the above required findings of facts were
NOT met.
Page 21 of 39

[PAGE 22]
COUNTY OF RANDOLPH
ORDER Choose the decision. SPECIAL USE PERMIT
IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION FOR SPECIAL USE PERMIT
BY JUSTIN JAMES
SPECIAL USE REQUEST #2025-00022026
NORTH CAROLINA RANDOLPH COUNTY
PLANNING BOARD
Having heard all the evidence and argument presented at the hearing on November 4,
2025, the Randolph County Planning Board finds that the application is complete, that
the application complies with all of the applicable requirements of the Randolph County
Unified Development Ordinance for the development proposed, and that therefore the
application to make use of the property located at 3566 Old Red Cross Rd for the
purpose indicated, hereby Choose the decision., subject to all applicable provisions of
the Randolph County Unified Development Ordinance.
HAVING CONSIDERED ALL THE EVIDENCE PRESENTED, THE RANDOLPH
COUNTY PLANNING BOARD Choose the decision. THE APPLICATION FOR A
SPECIAL USE PERMIT FOR JUSTIN JAMES BASED UPON THE FOLLOWING:
1. That the use will not materially endanger the public health or safety if located
where proposed and developed according to the plan as submitted and
approved. This conclusion is based on the following FINDINGS OF FACT:
Click here to enter findings of fact.
2. That the use meets all required conditions and specifications. This conclusion is
based on the following FINDINGS OF FACT:
Click here to enter findings of fact.
3. That the use will not substantially injure the value of adjoining or abutting
property, or that the use is a public necessity. This conclusion is based on the
following FINDINGS OF FACT:
Click here to enter findings of fact.
4. That the location and character of the use, if developed according to the plan as
submitted and approved, will be in harmony with the area in which it is to be
Page 22 of 39

[PAGE 23]
located and in general conformity with the Growth Management Plan for
Randolph County. This conclusion is based on the following FINDINGS OF
FACT:
Click here to enter findings of fact.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Randolph County Planning Board has caused this
Special Use Permit to be issued in its name, and the property owners do hereby accept
this Special Use Permit, together with all its conditions, as binding on them and their
successors in interest.
Adopted on November 4, 2025.
_____________________________________
Chair, Randolph County Planning Board
ATTEST
_______________________________
Kimberly J. Heinzer,
Clerk to the Randolph County Planning Board
Page 23 of 39

[PAGE 24]
MOTION TO APPROVE SPECIAL USE PERMIT
NORTH CAROLINA RANDOLPH COUNTY
PLANNING BOARD
“I make the motion to APPROVE this Special Use Permit
request on the specified parcel(s) on the Special Use
Permit application, based upon the sworn witness
testimony that is included in the minutes, as well as the
site plan(s) with any and all agreed-upon revisions, and
that the use will not materially endanger the public health
or safety, the use meets all required conditions and
specifications, the use will not substantially injure the
value of adjoining property, that the use is a public
necessity and the location and character of the use if
developed according to the plan(s) as submitted and
approved, will be in harmony with the area and in general
conformity with the Randolph County Unified Development
Ordinance.”
If making a second to the motion, please change to say, “I
second the motion . . .” and continue reading the rest of
the motion.
Page 24 of 39

[PAGE 25]
MOTION TO DENY SPECIAL USE PERMIT
NORTH CAROLINA RANDOLPH COUNTY
PLANNING BOARD
“I make the motion to DENY this Special Use Permit
request on the specified parcel(s) on the Special Use
Permit application, based upon the sworn witness
testimony that is included in the minutes, as well as the
site plan(s) with any and all agreed-upon revisions, and
that the use may materially endanger the public health or
safety, or the use does not meet all required conditions
and specifications, or the use may substantially injure the
value of adjoining property, that the use is not a public
necessity and the location and character of use if
developed according to the plan(s) as submitted and
approved, or will not be in harmony with the area and in
general conformity with the Randolph County Unified
Development Ordinance.”
If making a second to the motion, please change to say, “I
second the motion . . .” and continue reading the rest of
the motion.
Page 25 of 39

[PAGE 26]
RANDOLPH COUNTY TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMITTEE
REPORT AND MAP AMENDMENT EVALUATION
APPLICATION #2025-00022027
The Randolph County Planning Board will hold a duly published and notified legislative
hearing on the request by CAROLINA TRAVEL MANAGEMENT, INC, Randleman, NC,
and their request to rezone 54.80-acres out of 65.71-acres on the corner of US Hwy 220
Bus N and Holder Inman Rd Ext, Level Cross Township, Randleman Lake Protected
Area Watershed and Randleman Lake Critical Area Watershed, Tax ID #7757787799,
Primary Growth Area, from RA - Residential Agricultural District to LI - Light Industrial
District. It is the desire of the applicant to rezone the property to allow any uses allowed
by right in the LI - Light Industrial District.
GENERAL INFORMATION
Property Owner: Carolina Travel Management, Inc.
Hearing Type: Legislative
Small Area Plan: None
Flood Plain Overlay: None
Airport Overlay: None
Existing Use: Vacant
SITE INFORMATION AND SURROUNDING LAND USES
Direction Adjacent Zoning Adjacent Land Use
RM - Residential Mixed
District and RA - Hidden Forest Mobile
North
Residential Agricultural Home Park and Vacant
District
CVOM-CD - Conventional
Subdivision Overlay Mixed
Residential – Single family
South - Conditional District and
and Vacant
RA - Residential
Agricultural District
Technical Review Committee Report and Map Amendment Evaluation Page 1 of 5
Page 26 of 39

[PAGE 27]
Plastic Mold Manufacturing
East LI - Light Industrial District
Business
RA - Residential Residential – Single family
West
Agricultural District and Vacant
TRANSPORTATION INFORMATION
Information from the North Carolina Department of Transportation (NCDOT):
NC Department of Transportation will require a driveway permit to be obtained.
ZONING INFORMATION
Zoning History: There is no history of a rezoning, Variance, or Special Use
Permit at the request location.
Proposed Zoning District Standards from the Randolph County Unified
Development Ordinance, Article 600, Section 613 (ex., Fencing, buffers, etc.):
LI: LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT
PURPOSE
The purpose of the Light Industrial (LI) District is to provide a place for light
industrial, warehousing, distribution, and sales of large-item products.
DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS FOR PRIMARY STRUCTURE
Lot size with a minimum of 100 ft. of 40,000 sq. ft.
State road frontage Water Quality Critical Area: 80,000 sq. ft.
Lot size with less than 100 ft. of
5 acres
State road frontage
Lot width 100 ft. at building line
Front setback 35 ft. from any road right-of-way
Corner side setback 35 ft. from any road right-of-way
Side setback 10 ft. from any side property line
Rear setback 30 ft. from the rear property line
DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS FOR ACCESSORY STRUCTURES
Road setback 20 ft. from any road right-of-way
Property line setback 5 ft. from any property line
DIMENSIONAL STANDARDS NOTES
1. Lot areas and setbacks shall be increased if required by Randolph County Public Health.
2. Lot areas in designated Watersheds and Protected Areas are controlled by the Randolph County
Watershed Protection Regulations.
3. Front yard setback shall be maintained on all road rights-of-way.
Technical Review Committee Report and Map Amendment Evaluation Page 2 of 5
Page 27 of 39

[PAGE 28]
4. Minimum lot size requirements within Primary Growth Areas may be reduced to a minimum of 30,000
sq. ft. or 20,000 sq. ft. with public utilities.
5. The minimum lot size requirements within Secondary Growth Areas are 40,000 sq. ft.
6. The minimum lot size requirements within Rural Growth Areas are 3 acres for a major subdivision.
7. Lots in major subdivisions within Rural Growth Areas must maintain a 1:4 ratio.
8. The minimum lot size requirements within the Natural Heritage Overlay are 6 acres.
9. Conditional Districts are identical to the general use districts except for site plans, and individualized
development conditions are imposed only upon the signed petition of all owners of the land to be
included in the Conditional District.
Possible allowed uses in the LI - Light Industrial District include the following from the
Randolph County Unified Development Ordinance:
LI – Light Industrial District Uses
1. Accessory uses;
2. Agricultural uses;
3. Amusements, indoor commercial (ex. Bowling alleys, skating rinks);
4. Amusements, out-of-doors commercial (ex. Roller coasters, fairgrounds);
5. Apparel and accessory sales;
6. Auction sales, yards, permanent;
7. Auction sales, temporary, one-time use;
8. Automobile and truck rental;
9. Automobile body shops (excluding open storage of wrecked vehicles);
10. Automobile carwash, drive-through, requiring vehicle stacking;
11. Automobile part sales;
12. Automobile sales;
13. Automobile service stations;
14. Automobile storage (excluding open storage of wrecked vehicles);
15. Bakery;
16. Boats, recreational vehicle sales, and service;
17. Bottling plants;
18. Builders supply sales;
19. Cabinet making;
20. Churches and their customary uses including childcare on-premises;
21. Compartmentalized storage for individual storage of residential and
commercial goods;
22. Contractor’s yard and outdoor storage area;
23. Corporate offices or headquarters;
24. Dairy products, wholesale, and processing;
25. Daycare facility (corporate);
26. Farm machinery sales;
27. Fire, sheriff, and emergency services;
28. Food freezer operations;
29. Home occupations;
Technical Review Committee Report and Map Amendment Evaluation Page 3 of 5
Page 28 of 39

[PAGE 29]
30. Industrial equipment sales and service;
31. Kennels;
32. Laboratory, research;
33. Machine shop, welding shop;
34. Mini-warehouse;
35. Mixed commercial and residential use where commercial use is primary and
both occupy the same structure or lot;
36. Mobile home, travel trailer, camper, marine, recreational vehicle sales;
37. Monument and cut stone manufacture and sales;
38. Nursery and plant cultivation and sales;
39. Outdoor storage yard;
40. Pottery manufacturing and sales;
41. Printing and reproduction shop;
42. Radio or television studio;
43. Service stations;
44. Sheet metal fabrication;
45. Sign, directional gateway;
46. Sign, on-premise;
47. Sign, outdoor advertising (off-premises);
48. Temporary buildings, incidental to the development;
49. Temporary carnivals, rides, Ferris wheels;
50. Theater, drive-in;
51. Tobacco sales and warehousing;
52. Trailer rentals;
53. Truck terminal;
54. Upholstering and furniture refinishing;
55. Veterinary clinics;
56. Warehouses, sales, or service; and
57. Wholesale sales, not otherwise listed.
TECHNICAL REVIEW COMMITTEE ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATION
The Technical Review Committee has reviewed this request and finds that this request:
• Meets all technical requirements of both the Ordinance and the Plan;
• Is consistent, reasonable, and in the public interest; and
• Should be APPROVED by the Randolph County Planning Board.
The following policies from the Randolph County Growth Management Plan were
identified by the Technical Review Committee as supporting the above conclusion.
Technical Review Committee Report and Map Amendment Evaluation Page 4 of 5
Page 29 of 39

[PAGE 30]
Policy 5.1: Encourage new and expanding industries and businesses which diversifies
the local economy by utilizing a more highly skilled labor force which increases area
residents’ income and increases the tax base.
Consistency Analysis: The property is located along US Hwy 220 Bus N where
expansion of diverse businesses is encouraged. It is also located near Interstate Hwy 73,
which is a major transportation corridor.
Policy 5.5: The benefits of economic development and employment opportunities should
be balanced against the surrounding effects such development may have on the quality
of life enjoyed by area residents and the health of the environment.
Consistency Analysis: The proposed rezoning of the property would be balanced by
employment opportunities and quality of life for surrounding residents and also allow
expansion of industrial and commercially zoned properties in this area. The property is
adjacent to an existing Industrial business.
Reasonableness and Public Interest Analysis: The policies listed above illustrate
how this request is consistent with the Ordinance, the Plan, and applicable General
Statutes.
It should be noted that this recommendation is only the opinion of the
Technical Review Committee based on information supplied by the applicant
before the public hearing. Additional information provided at the public
hearing could cause the Planning Board to either accept or reject these
recommendations.
Technical Review Committee Report and Map Amendment Evaluation Page 5 of 5
Page 30 of 39

[PAGE 31]
COUNTY OF RANDOLPH
Department of Planning & Zoning
204 E Academy St - Asheboro NC 27204
APPLICATION FOR ZONING CHANGE
Applicant: MOODY, JONATHAN Date: 10/03/2025
Address: 5069 CRACKLING WOODS LN Parcel #: 7757787799
City, St. Zip: RANDLEMAN, NC 27317
Permit #: 2025-00022027
Owner: CAROLINA TRAVEL MANAGEMENT INC
Permit Type Code: PZ 2
Address: 10367 RANDLEMAN RD
City, St. Zip: RANDLEMAN, NC 27317 Location Address:
CONTACT NAME: MOODY, JONATHAN Contact Phone: 336 823-3924
PARCEL INFORMATION:
Lot number: Subdivsion:
Acreage: 65.7100 Township: 10 - LEVEL CROSS
ZONING INFORMATION:
Zoning District 1: LI-LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT
Zoning District 2: RA-RESIDENTIAL AGRICULTURAL DISTRICT
Zoning District 3:
Growth Management Areas: RURAL GROWTH AREA
Growth Management Areas: PRIMARY GROWTH AREA
Specialty District:
Watershed Name: RANDLEMAN LAKE WATERSHED
Class A Flood Plain On Prop?: NO
Flood Plane Map #: Flood Plain Map #: 3710774600J
REQUESTED CHANGE:
Area To Be Rezoned: 54.8000
Lot Size Indicator: ACRE(S)
Proposed Zoning District: LI-LIGHT INDUSTRIAL DISTRICT
Proposed Growth Mgmt Change:
Proposed Use(S): TO ALLOW ANY USES ALLOWED IN THE LI - LIGHT INDUSTRIAL
DISTRICT
Condition(S):
Total Permit Fee: $250.00
COMMENTS:
The undersigned owner/applicant do hereby make application for a PROPERTY ZONING CHANGE as
allowed by the Randolph County Zoning Ordinance.
Timothy Mangum
Authorized County Official Signature of Applicant:
- LOCAL TELEPHONE NUMBER -
Asheboro: (336) 318-6565 - Archdale/Trinity: (336) 819-3565 http://www.randolphcountync.gov
APPLICATION FOR ZONING CHANGE Page: 1 of 1
Page 31 of 39

[PAGE 32]
HC-CD
I
N
T
E
R RM
S
T
A HC
T
E
H
W
WY220BUSN
H
Y S
U
7
3
RA
I
7
3
L
NN
LI
R B
T S
T
T UO
K E B N
O C 0 R
H 2 A
2 M
Y P H
W O
U
L
H S
D
S H E
U W R D
M A
R S R
A M P
Y
2 2 0
B
IN
M A NR D E XT CVOM-CD
R
MI L L
R
H U E
CTRYLN
X I
T S
N A L
K
E W
B
HOLDER
INMAN RD D
L
S O
3
7 RR
I
±
Carolina Travel Management Inc Zoning Change Request
This property is located in the Randleman Lake Watershed Area
1 inch equals 562 feet
and a Primary Growth Area.
Application #
2025-00022027
The information contained in this map comes from the best available public data sources. Users should consult the primary data source.
Page 32 of 39

[PAGE 33]
d'rb2
a s ^t- n tz q oo S _^(0o
I
z
.
f'9
ll
E)(
o
i!z
B=99d_.[
o
i}l:s;3
> ii E { 5 E F=
lnr
J
- J -- \ a'A ',' .= ^ ) ^ o @ O=o 6 or_ 1-_
T
I
IE.?qE:E
5:
i !
8 a
r g t
II
ix=i
"
{._ e o , r o - = 3 J ? 4 o ! ; ic i o - H . 6 .ll ._
t
I
n I P d
i ; s
i
A g q i s l E r
:a3i
lloo>@
Fo
E3Es
e;Ai
F
3c.
-t
Nd ,t E
:rA
:
o
q<.oJ 4 ! : @ e
!r
6
e 5 ;i i>l
qoU
6H
g[
e { 6
EJ
Hfaa 3g qB
EE
3
.o ,f
4 X 6 ia -a \r
g -a 6-:-
9a
o
e:-"
aEq
=;JO #i of-, oP- ',r, _ li
1
F it E E q <
C3
i5X-:
< E " : =1
El
o
9.-i* iE
'
)
Za
\-.
6
:
o t- + J l o ::E37 oN
o z
-=ro +'' + <'
\
Sto'te
-
11N n J=CB 3 <Jr o
-P'tf,",.
a
49
0g
)1102(
l8
oAn
htroN dnG
"*tY
\
\
'-E!
\
)
3p
s-{
t
j"/
o_
m
o
I
\
J
!
o a l
- =
3
{
{ l
z
l-
@
c
(:
t
3
2
g
5
lvrT
::
t-
$
{ €
\
P
o J
5!-
3
o
9,-^
o(
-o
c
@x
J
o
\N
o o
o
{ I
sivaD .C
hplaR
sivaD .T
dloraH
g
t--
773 .gp
0451
BD
z
-
o q s
P o
-
1.-
3
{.
0
J J F t
Page 33 of 39

[PAGE 34]
I
N
T
E
R
S
T
A
T
E
H
W
Y
WY220BUSN
H
7 S
U
3
N
S
U
L B
R
T
T 0
T 2
E
K 2
C
O Y
H W
H
S
H
U
O
P L
M D
E
A R
R
IN EX
MA T M R D T
R S X I AN
H E
C
TRYLN B
S
7
3 HOLDER
INMAN RD
I
±
Carolina Travel Management Inc Zoning Change Request
This property is located in the Randleman Lake Watershed Area
1 inch equals 562 feet
and a Primary Growth Area.
Application #
2025-00022027
The information contained in this map comes from the best available public data sources. Users should consult the primary data source.
Page 34 of 39

[PAGE 35]
COUNTY OF RANDOLPH
CONSISTENCY DETERMINATION AND
FINDING OF REASONABLENESS AND PUBLIC INTEREST
IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION FOR REZONING
BY CAROLINA TRAVEL MANAGEMENT, INC.
REZONING REQUEST #2025-00022027
NORTH CAROLINA RANDOLPH COUNTY
PLANNING BOARD
According to North Carolina General Statutes § 160D and the Randolph County Unified
Development Ordinance, the Randolph County Planning Board finds that the proposed
zoning district map amendments to LI - Light Industrial District as described in the
application of Carolina Travel Management, Inc. are consistent with the Randolph
County Unified Development Ordinance and the Randolph County Growth Management
Plan and are reasonable and in the public interest for the following reasons:
1. Determination of Consistency with the Growth Management Plan.
A. Consistency with Growth Management Plan Map
The Randolph County Growth Management Plan map for the southeast area
shows the parcel to be rezoned in an area designated as Primary Growth Area
which generally lie along major transportation corridors and have access to urban
services. This parcel is along US Hwy 220 Bus N and near Interstate Hwy 73,
which is a major transportation corridor.
B. Consistency with Growth Policies in the Growth Management Plan
Policy 5.1: Encourage new and expanding industries and businesses which
diversifies the local economy by utilizing a more highly skilled labor force which
increases area residents’ income and increases the tax base.
Consistency Analysis: The property is located along US Hwy 220 Bus N where
expansion of diverse businesses is encouraged. It is also located near Interstate
Hwy 73, which is a major transportation corridor.
Policy 5.5: The benefits of economic development and employment opportunities
should be balanced against the surrounding effects such development may have
on the quality of life enjoyed by area residents and the health of the environment.
Page 35 of 39

[PAGE 36]
Consistency Analysis: The proposed rezoning of the property would be balanced
by employment opportunities and quality of life for surrounding residents and also
allow expansion of industrial and commercially zoned properties in this area. The
property is adjacent to an existing Industrial business.
2. Statement of Reasonableness and Public Interest
Reasonableness and Public Interest Analysis:
The policies listed above illustrate how this request is consistent with the
Ordinance, the Plan, and applicable General Statutes.
Adopted on November 4, 2025.
_____________________________________
Chair, Randolph County Planning Board
ATTEST
_______________________________
Kimberly J. Heinzer,
Clerk to the Randolph County Planning Board
Page 36 of 39

[PAGE 37]
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF
RANDOLPH COUNTY, NORTH CAROLINA
UPON REQUEST BY CAROLINA TRAVEL MANAGEMENT, INC.
WHEREAS, a 54.80-acre parcel, having the Randolph County Parcel Identification
Number of 7757787799 is currently zoned RA - Residential Agricultural District by
Randolph County, North Carolina;
WHEREAS, the Randolph County Planning Board has conducted a duly noticed public
hearing on November 4, 2025, to consider the proposed rezoning on application
number 2025-00022027, and all procedural requirements found in North Carolina
General Statute 160D and the Randolph County Unified Development Ordinance have
been satisfied;
WHEREAS, the Randolph County Planning Board has found that the proposed
rezoning is consistent with the Randolph County Unified Development Ordinance and
the Randolph County Growth Management Plan and is reasonable and in the public
interest, and the Randolph County Planning Board has adopted a separate statement to
this effect;
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE RANDOLPH COUNTY PLANNING
BOARD THAT, the property is hereby rezoned to LI - Light Industrial District. The
official Randolph County Zoning Map and the Randolph County Growth Management
Plan Map are hereby amended, if necessary, to reflect the same, and this Ordinance
shall become effective upon adoption.
Adopted on November 4, 2025.
_____________________________________
Chair, Randolph County Planning Board
ATTEST
_______________________________
Kimberly J. Heinzer,
Clerk to the Randolph County Planning Board
Page 37 of 39

[PAGE 38]
MOTION TO APPROVE
A REZONING
NORTH CAROLINA RANDOLPH COUNTY
PLANNING BOARD
“I make the motion to APPROVE this rezoning
request to rezone the specified parcel(s) on the
rezoning application and the Map Amendment
Ordinance, to the requested zoning district based
upon the Determination of Consistency and
Findings of Reasonableness and Public Interest
statements that are included in the Planning Board
agenda, submitted during the rezoning presentation
and as may be amended, incorporated into the
motion, to be included in the minutes and that the
request is also consistent with the Randolph County
Growth Management Plan.”
If making a second to the motion, please change to
say, “I second the motion . . .” and continue reading
the rest of the motion.
Page 38 of 39

[PAGE 39]
MOTION TO DENY
A REZONING
NORTH CAROLINA RANDOLPH COUNTY
PLANNING BOARD
“I make the motion to DENY this rezoning request to
rezone the specified parcel(s) on the rezoning
application to the requested zoning district based
upon the Determination of Consistency and
Findings of Reasonableness and Public Interest
statements that are included in the Planning Board
agenda, submitted during the rezoning presentation
and as may be amended, incorporated into the
motion, to be included in the minutes and that the
request is not consistent with the Randolph County
Growth Management Plan.”
If making a second to the motion, please change to
say, “I second the motion . . .” and continue reading
the rest of the motion.
Page 39 of 39