[PAGE 1] PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AGENDA Thursday, April 16, 2026, at 6:00 PM City Hall, 1838 Emerald Hill Lane Westminster, Maryland 21157 https://www.youtube.com/@CityofWestminsterMD 1. Call To Order 2. Approval Of Minute Summary Documents: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES 3 19 26.PDF 3. New Business 3.I. Item A: Public Hearing For Annexation No. 72 (Resolution 26-03), Patamy, LLC (A. Gerhard, DCPD) Request: Review Annexation Resolution 26-03 approving Annexation 72 and annexation plan for Annexation 72 and provide a recommendation to the Mayor and Common Council. Documents: RESOLUTION 26-03 (ANNEX 72) PZC PH SR.PDF ATTACH 1 ANNEX RES 26-03 (ANNEX NO 72).PDF ATTACH 2 ANNEXATION PLAN (ANNEX NO 72).PDF ATTACH 3 PETITION FOR ANNEXATION.PDF ATTACH 4 ANNEXATION AGREEMENT.PDF ATTACH 5 MDP ANNEXATION 72 LETTER.PDF 4. Old Business 4.I. Item B: Map Amendment ZMA 24-01, The Willows - Approval Of Recommendation Letter To Mayor And Common Council And Ordinance (M. Depo, DCPD) Request: Zonal Map Amendment reclassifying certain real property from the R-7,500 Residential Zone to the Planned Development-9 Zone. The subject properties are identified by the State Department of Assessments and Taxation (SDAT) as #07- 020430, #07-114443, #07-033338, #07-011490, #07-011482, #07-032471, #07-032455, and #07-044429 and located off and east of Pennsylvania Avenue and north of Sullivan Avenue. The applicant is proposing to construct 20 two-over-two dwellings for a total of 40 dwelling units. Applicant: D.R. Acquisitions LLC Owner: DASY Corporation, c/o Edward O. Bollinger, 52 Bachmans Valley Road, Westminster MD 21158-3108 Attorney: David K. Bowersox, Hoffman, Comfort, Offutt, Scott & Halstad LLP, 24 N Court Street, Westminster, MD 21157 Engineer: Martin Hacket, CLSI, 439 E Main Street, Westminster, MD 21157 Documents: ITEM B ZMA 24-01 WILLOWS PD-9 PZC RECOMMENDATION SR.PDF ATTACH 1 2026-04-16 PZC RECOMMENDATION LETTER FOR THE WILLOWS.PDF ATTACH 2 2026-04-16 ORDINANCE_WILLOWS.PDF 5. Information Item 5.I. Carroll County Liaison Report 6. Planning Commission Comments 7. Adjournment 8. Request For Decorum And Order The Chair and Commissioners would like to thank you in advance for your respectful behavior and for your thoughtful consideration of the views of your neighbors, applicants, and the Commission. Members of the public attending meetings of the Planning and Zoning Commission are expected to maintain decorum and good order and to remain quiet when not recognized by the Chairperson. Any person who makes personal attacks or defamatory remarks, who makes loud comments when not recognized by the Chairperson, or who stamps his or her feet, whistles, yells, or engages in similarly disruptive conduct will be asked to leave. Persons who are asked to leave by the Chair and refuse to do so may be removed. Unauthorized remarks from the audience, stamping of feet, whistles, yells, and other similar demonstrations will not be permitted by the presiding officer. Offending parties will be asked to remove themselves from the meeting room. [PAGE 2] PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION AGENDA Thursday, April 16, 2026, at 6:00 PM City Hall, 1838 Emerald Hill Lane Westminster, Maryland 21157 https://www.youtube.com/@CityofWestminsterMD 1. Call To Order 2. Approval Of Minute Summary Documents: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING MINUTES 3 19 26.PDF 3. New Business 3.I. Item A: Public Hearing For Annexation No. 72 (Resolution 26-03), Patamy, LLC (A. Gerhard, DCPD) Request: Review Annexation Resolution 26-03 approving Annexation 72 and annexation plan for Annexation 72 and provide a recommendation to the Mayor and Common Council. Documents: RESOLUTION 26-03 (ANNEX 72) PZC PH SR.PDF ATTACH 1 ANNEX RES 26-03 (ANNEX NO 72).PDF ATTACH 2 ANNEXATION PLAN (ANNEX NO 72).PDF ATTACH 3 PETITION FOR ANNEXATION.PDF ATTACH 4 ANNEXATION AGREEMENT.PDF ATTACH 5 MDP ANNEXATION 72 LETTER.PDF 4. Old Business 4.I. Item B: Map Amendment ZMA 24-01, The Willows - Approval Of Recommendation Letter To Mayor And Common Council And Ordinance (M. Depo, DCPD) Request: Zonal Map Amendment reclassifying certain real property from the R-7,500 Residential Zone to the Planned Development-9 Zone. The subject properties are identified by the State Department of Assessments and Taxation (SDAT) as #07- 020430, #07-114443, #07-033338, #07-011490, #07-011482, #07-032471, #07-032455, and #07-044429 and located off and east of Pennsylvania Avenue and north of Sullivan Avenue. The applicant is proposing to construct 20 two-over-two dwellings for a total of 40 dwelling units. Applicant: D.R. Acquisitions LLC Owner: DASY Corporation, c/o Edward O. Bollinger, 52 Bachmans Valley Road, Westminster MD 21158-3108 Attorney: David K. Bowersox, Hoffman, Comfort, Offutt, Scott & Halstad LLP, 24 N Court Street, Westminster, MD 21157 Engineer: Martin Hacket, CLSI, 439 E Main Street, Westminster, MD 21157 Documents: ITEM B ZMA 24-01 WILLOWS PD-9 PZC RECOMMENDATION SR.PDF ATTACH 1 2026-04-16 PZC RECOMMENDATION LETTER FOR THE WILLOWS.PDF ATTACH 2 2026-04-16 ORDINANCE_WILLOWS.PDF 5. Information Item 5.I. Carroll County Liaison Report 6. Planning Commission Comments 7. Adjournment 8. Request For Decorum And Order The Chair and Commissioners would like to thank you in advance for your respectful behavior and for your thoughtful consideration of the views of your neighbors, applicants, and the Commission. Members of the public attending meetings of the Planning and Zoning Commission are expected to maintain decorum and good order and to remain quiet when not recognized by the Chairperson. Any person who makes personal attacks or defamatory remarks, who makes loud comments when not recognized by the Chairperson, or who stamps his or her feet, whistles, yells, or engages in similarly disruptive conduct will be asked to leave. Persons who are asked to leave by the Chair and refuse to do so may be removed. Unauthorized remarks from the audience, stamping of feet, whistles, yells, and other similar demonstrations will not be permitted by the presiding officer. Offending parties will be asked to remove themselves from the meeting room. [PAGE 3] CITY OF WESTMINSTER PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION MEETING SUMMARY Thursday, March 19, 2026, at 6:05 p.m. In-Person Meeting and broadcasted live on the City YouTube Channel I. Call to Order A meeting of the City of Westminster Planning and Zoning Commission was held, and broadcast live on the City YouTube Channel, on Thursday, March 19, 2026, at 6:05 p.m. Chair Tom Beyard, Vice Chair Lyndi McNulty, Commissioner Kevin Beaver; Commissioner Jay Voight, and Councilmember Dan Hoff, Ex Officio were present. Director of Community Planning and Development Mark Depo, Senior Planner Andrea Gerhard, Attorney Meredith McKinnion (Via-Zoom), and Doug Barber, City Clerk were also present. Chair Beyard opened the meeting at 6:05 p.m. II. Approval of Meeting Summary – March 15, 2025, and February 19, 2026 Chair Beyard requested a motion to approve the meeting summary of March 15, 2025, and February 19, 2026. Vice Chair McNulty moved to approve the meeting summary of March 15, 2025, and February 19, 2026. Commissioner Beaver seconded the motion. The motion passed 5-0. III. New Business There was no new business to be discussed by the Commission. IV. Old Business Item A: Map Amendment ZMA 24-01, The Willows Recommendation to Mayor and Common Council Director of Community Planning and Development Depo provided the staff report for the item. noted that due to the multiple meetings and decisions by the City of Westminster Planning and Zoning Commission throughout the review Motion: Councilmember Dan Hoff, Ex Officio moved that the City of Westminster Planning and Zoning Commission find that ZMA 24-01 is in accordance with Zoning Ordinance Article XIV and Article XXIII, Section 164-188, and forward a favorable recommendation to the Mayor and Common Council that include the planned development plan Option 3 and architectural elevations Option A, as further amended, and Option B, approved by the Commission. Commissioner Beaver seconded the motion. The motion passed 5-0. [PAGE 4] Carroll County Liaison Report There was no Carroll County Liaison Report given at the meeting. V. Planning Commission Comments There were no Planning Commission Comments given at the meeting. VI. Adjournment Motion: Chair Beyard requested a motion to adjourn the meeting. Commissioner Beaver moved to adjourn the City of Westminster Planning and Zoning Meeting of March 19, 2026. Vice McNulty seconded the motion. The motion passed 5-0. The meeting adjourned at 6:15 p.m. __________________________________________ Mr. Tom Beyard, Chair City of Westminster Planning and Zoning Commission Official Recordings of the City of Westminster Planning and Zoning Commission are available for viewing in their entirety on the City’s YouTube channel. Adopted by the City of Westminster Planning and Zoning Commission on________________. [PAGE 5] ITEM A: Resolution No. 26-03- Public Hearing To: Planning and Zoning Commission From: Mark A. Depo, Director of Community Planning & Development Meeting Date: April 16, 2026 Re: Annexation No. 72, Patamy, LLC; Annexation Resolution 26-03; and Annexation Plan The Department of Community Planning and Development (DCPD) is requesting the Planning and Zoning Commission review the Annexation Plan for Annexation No. 72 and Annexation Resolution 26-03, Patamy, LLC, approving Annexation No. 72 and provide a recommendation to the Mayor and Common Council. [Attachment 1 and 2] BACKGROUND Annexation The Mayor and Common Council may enlarge the boundaries of the City of Westminster (the “City”) as provided in the Annotated Code of Maryland, Local Gov’t, Division II. Municipalities, Title 4. In General, Subtitle 4. Annexation, § 4-401. A municipality may annex only land that (1) is contiguous to and adjoining the existing boundaries of the municipality; and (2) does not create an unincorporated area that is bounded on all sides by: (i) real property presently in the boundaries of the municipality; (ii) real property proposed to be in the boundaries of the municipality as a result of the proposed annexation; or (iii) any combination of real property described in item (i) or (ii) of this item. Pursuant to MD Code, Local Gov’t (“LG”), Div. II, Title 4, Subtitle 4., § 4-402, “An annexation proposal may be initiated by: (1) the legislative body of the municipality as provided in § 4-403 of this subtitle; or (2) a petition in accordance with § 4-404 of this subtitle.” LG § 4-404, “Proposal for annexation – Initiation by petition,” provides: (a) Subject to § 4-413 of this subtitle, an annexation petition shall be signed by: (1) at least 25% of the registered voters who are residents in the area to be annexed; and (2) the owners of at least 25% of the assessed valuation of the real property in the area to be annexed. (b) After an annexation petition is presented to the legislative body of a municipality, the presiding officer of the legislative body shall verify: (1) the signatures on the petition; and (2) that the petition meets the requirements of subsection (a) of this section. (c) [PAGE 6] (1) After verifying compliance with the requirements of this section, the presiding officer of the legislative body promptly shall cause a resolution proposing the change of boundaries as requested by the petition to be introduced in the legislative body. (2) The annexation resolution shall conform to the form and content requirements of this subtitle. Pursuant to MD Code, LG, Div. II, Title 4, Subtitle 4., § 4-415(a), “In addition to, but not as part of, an annexation resolution, the legislative body of the municipality shall adopt an annexation plan for the area to be annexed. [Attachment 2] Pursuant to MD Code, LG, Div. II, Title 4, Subtitle 4., § 4-415(c), “… for annexation that begins on or after October 1, 2009, the annexation plan shall be consistent with the municipal growth element of the comprehensive plan of the municipality.” Pursuant to MD Code, LG, Div. II, Title 4, Subtitle 4., § 4-415(f), “At least 30 days before the public hearing on an annexation resolution required under § 4-406 of this subtitle, a copy of the annexation plan shall be provided to: (1) the governing body of any county in which the municipality is located; (2) the Department of Planning; and (3) any regional or State planning agency with jurisdiction in the county.” Pursuant to MD Code, LG, Div. II, Title 4, Subtitle 4., § 4-415(g)(1), “The annexation plan shall be open to public review and discussion at the public hearing on the annexation resolution.” As such, we have consistently included the annexation plan and annexation plan resolution as part of the annexation resolution public hearing. Annexation Petition The Petitioner seeks the annexation of real property containing approximately ± 1.4983 acres located at 10 Sullivan Road, Westminster, Maryland 21157 and further identified as tax account number 07- 048408, Map 0039, Grid 0013, Parcel 0752 (the “Property”) and ± 1.446 acres of right-of-way containing a portion of College View Boulevard (Maryland Route 140/Maryland Route 97), belonging to the State Highway Administration (“SHA right-of-way”), into the corporate boundaries of the City. [Attachment 3] The Property and the SHA right-of-way collectively comprise of ± 2.9443 acres, the Annexation Area. The Petitioner is the owner of the Property. The City has verified the signatures on the petition in accordance with § 4-404(a) and § 4-404(b). The annexation area is zoned “C-2 Commercial Medium Intensity District” under the zoning laws of Carroll County. The Petitioners are requesting that the Property be zoned “B Business Zone” under the City’s Zoning Ordinance. Development in the “C-2 Commercial Medium Intensity District” is substantially similar to development in the “B Business Zone”. The Petitioner, as the Owner of the Property, and the City entered an Annexation Agreement that outlined certain obligations of both the City and the Owner prior to the annexation of the Property. On December 11, 2023, the Mayor and Common Council approved the Annexation Agreement. Planning and Zoning Commission Public Hearing on Annex. Resolution 26-03 April 16, 2026 Page 2 of 7 [PAGE 7] [Attachment 4]. The Annexation Agreement, dated July 12, 2021, was recorded among the Land Records of Carroll County in Book H.D. No. 10375, Page 154. In general, the Annexation Agreement allows the Owner to obtain the additional water necessary, approximately 1,332 gallon of water per day (GPD), to allow the Owner to construct and operate a convenience store and gas pumps at the Property, subject to: 1) compliance with the City’s Development Design Preferences, Landscape Manual, and the City’s regulations relating to the B-Business Zone and 2) complying with the City’s regulations relating to signage; and 3) annexation of the Property. The Petitioner is currently constructing a Sheetz convenience store and gas pumps at the Property. “General retail or general service, between 10,000 and 60,000 square feet” and “Fuel station” are permitted uses in Carroll County’s “C-2 Commercial Medium Intensity District.” “Automobile service stations, subject to the provisions of § 164-149” is a special exception use in the City’s “B Business Zone.” Pursuant to the Carroll County Water and Sewer Master Plan and the City of Westminster and Carroll County Agreement, “for property contiguous to the corporate limits, the owner must initiate annexation of the property into the City for the property to be served. If the property does not meet the test for annexation, the owner must file a Good Cause Waiver application with the City.” Pursuant to City Water and Sewer Allocation Policy Section I., Water Allocations, Subsection D., Annexations, “owners of properties located outside the City limits but inside the water service area that are eligible for annexation under State law who desire to connect to the City’s public water system or require additional allocation must be annexed into the City to be eligible to apply for water allocation.” Pursuant to City Water and Sewer Allocation Policy Section II., Sewer Allocations, Subsection E., Annexations, “owners of properties located outside the City and inside the sewer service area that are eligible for annexation under State law who desire to connect to the City’s public sewer system or require additional sewer allocation must be annexed into the City to be eligible to apply for sewer allocation.” On February 9, 2026, Annexation Resolution 26-03 for Annexation No. 72 was introduced, including the annexation plan for Annexation 72, by the Mayor and Common Council, allowing the annexation process to begin. On February 10, 2026, Annexation Resolution 26-03, along with an annexation plan, pursuant to the Annotated Code of Maryland, Local Government Article, Title 4, Subtitle 4, was emailed to Carroll County. Additionally, hard copies were made available to Carroll County Planning & Land Management and the public at the City of Westminster Administrative Offices, 45 W. Main Street, Westminster, Maryland 21157. On February 10, 2026, The Department of Community Planning and Development forwarded, via email, Annexation Resolution 26-03 and the annexation plan to Maryland Department of Planning (MDP), pursuant to the Annotated Code of Maryland, Local Government Article, Title 4, Subtitle 4; Maryland Department of Transportation State Highway Administration; and certain Carroll County agencies/departments. On February 26, 2026, MDP forwarded its review comments to the Honorable Dr. Mona L. Becker, City of Westminster. [Attachment 5] Planning and Zoning Commission Public Hearing on Annex. Resolution 26-03 April 16, 2026 Page 3 of 7 [PAGE 8] On March 17, 2026, the Carroll County Planning and Zoning Commission met to discuss Annexation No. 72, Patamy, LLC, and to provide a recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners. On March 26, 2026, The Board of County Commissioners of Carroll County voted to provide a comment letter documenting their review process and comments received during the Carroll County 60-day review period. The Property is located outside the City limits but inside the water service area and sewer service area and is eligible for annexation under State law. The Property is currently being served by public water and sewer. PROPERTY LOCATION = Annexation Area City Boundary COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The annexation area is located within the City of Westminster’s Municipal Growth Area Boundary. The property has a Land Use Designation of Commercial in the 2007 Westminster Environs Community Comprehensive Plan. Annexation No. 72 is consistent with this Land Use Designation. The property is located within the County-certified Priority Funding Area. Planning and Zoning Commission Public Hearing on Annex. Resolution 26-03 April 16, 2026 Page 4 of 7 [PAGE 9] Goal L3 states: “Provide a sustainable balance of new commercial, industrial, and residential land to meet existing and future demand.” Under this overarching land use goal, Objective 1 is to “Expand the corporate limits where appropriate to accommodate projected residential growth and provide needed jobs and services in the City.” The two policies under Objective 1 are “a. Coordinate with the County to identify parcels that are appropriate for annexation as industrial or commercial land” and “b. Extend water and sewer service to annexed lands when appropriate.” This parcel is well suited to meet this goal. Additional Information Public Schools: The City does not provide Public School service. There are no existing residents in the annexation area. The annexation area is being redeveloped for commercial use and no dwelling units are proposed. There is no increase in population, no increase in public school enrollment, and therefore no impact on public schools. Library Services: The City does not provide library services. There is no increase in population, no increase in library attendance, and therefore no impact on library services. Police/Fire/EMS: The City does not provide Fire and EMS services. The Chief of Police estimates any impact on police services to be minimal because the annexation does not increase the residential population, and the nature of the proposed use is such that any increase in calls for services will be nominal. Parks & Recreation: There is no increase in population, no increase in parks & recreation activity, and therefore no impact on parks & recreation services. Water & Sewer: The City does provide water and sewerage facilities. There is an increase in water service and sewer service and the additional water capacity and sewer capacity is available and may be tentatively allocated pursuant to the City Water and Sewer Allocation Policy, subject to annexation of the Property (See Resolution No. 26-03). Stormwater Management: On-site stormwater management is the responsibility of the property owner. No disturbance is proposed in connection with the annexation, and therefore no impact on stormwater management facilities. Any future proposed disturbance to the annexation area shall be reviewed for possible impacts and required stormwater management improvements provided. Fiber Infrastructure: The City owns the Westminster Fiber Network, and Ting Internet is leasing the fiber in order to provide Internet service Planning and Zoning Commission Public Hearing on Annex. Resolution 26-03 April 16, 2026 Page 5 of 7 [PAGE 10] to the residents and business owners within the Westminster city limits. The property owner will be offered information r egarding fiber infrastructure and connectivity. City-County Policy: The proposal meets the goals of the Westminster City-County Agreement to allow for annexation of properties within the designated Growth Area Boundary. Requested City Zoning: The proposal meets goals of the Westminster City-County Agreement to allow for annexation of properties within the designated Growth Area Boundary. ANNEXATION PETITION The annexation petition submitted by the Petitioner meets the requirements for annexation under State law as described above. The petition has been signed by or submitted with the consent of the owners of 100% of the assessed valuation of the real property in the annexation area and there are no persons residing within the annexation area. The Property is contiguous to and adjoining the existing boundaries of the City. Annexation of the Property will not create an enclave of unincorporated land within the City’s boundaries. PROCESS Pursuant to Zoning Ordinance Section 164-6, “Zoning of Annexed Lands”, “Whenever a joint petition for annexation and zoning is filed with the City and there shall be introduced before the Mayor and [Common] Council a resolution to enlarge the corporate boundaries of the City in accordance with the requirements of applicable law, the Mayor and Council shall also consider, as appropriate, an application for a local or sectional Zoning Map amendment for the territory proposed to be incorporated into the City by the resolution.” Following introduction of the annexation petition and resolution to the Mayor and Common Council, the resolution will be forwarded to the Carroll County and Maryland Department of Planning for its information and comment and to the City’s Planning Commission for its recommendation. As outlined above, Annexation Resolution 26-03, along with an annexation plan was provided to Carroll County Planning & Land Management and Maryland Department of Planning on February 9, 2026. Furthermore, Maryland Department of Planning provided comments regarding Annexation No. 72 on February 26, 2026; Carroll County Planning and Zoning Commission reviewed Annexation No. 72 on March 17, 2026; and the Board of County Commissioners of Carroll County provided a comment letter on March 26, 2026. The Planning and Zoning Commission Notice of Public Hearing for Resolution 26-03 was advertised on Monday, March 30, 2026 (16 days prior to the hearing) and Monday, April 6, 2026, in the Carroll County Times. [Zoning Ordinance Section 164-185 A.] Planning and Zoning Commission Public Hearing on Annex. Resolution 26-03 April 16, 2026 Page 6 of 7 [PAGE 11] RECOMMENDATION The Department of Community Planning & Development recommends that the City of Westminster Planning and Zoning Commission forward Resolution No. 26-03, Patamy, LLC (Annexation 72) to the City of Westminster Mayor and Common Council with a favorable recommendation. ATTACHMENTS 1. Annexation Resolution No. 26-03 2. Annexation Plan 3. Annexation Petition 4. Annexation Agreement 5. Maryland Department of Planning Comment Letter cc: Sara Imhulse, City Administrator Ramsay M. Whitworth, Esq., City Attorney Planning and Zoning Commission Public Hearing on Annex. Resolution 26-03 April 16, 2026 Page 7 of 7 [PAGE 12] RESOLUTION NO. 26-03 ENLARGING THE CORPORATE BOUNDARIES OF THE CITY OF WESTMINSTER BY ANNEXING INTO THE CITY CERTAIN PROPERTY CONTAINING ± 2.9443 ACRES, CONTIGUOUS AND ADJOINING TO THE CITY’S EXISTING CORPORATE BOUNDARIES, CONSISTING OF REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT 10 SULLIVAN ROAD, WESTMINSTER, MARYLAND 21157, ALSO IDENTIFIED AS TAX ACCOUNT NUMBER 07-048408, MAP 0039, GRID 0013, PARCEL 0752 AND COMPRISING OF ± 1.4983 ACRES AND ± 1.446 ACRES OF RIGHT- OF-WAY CONTAINING A PORTION OF COLLEGE VIEW BOULEVARD (MARYLAND ROUTE 140/MARYLAND ROUTE 97), BELONGING TO THE MARYLAND DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STATE HIGHWAY ADMINISTRATION. (Annexation No. 72) WHEREAS, pursuant to Local Government Article, Title 4, Subtitle 4 of the Annotated Code of Maryland, and §164-6 of the Code of the City of Westminster, the Mayor and Common Council of Westminster (the “City”) is vested with the authority and discretion to enlarge the corporate boundaries of the City; and WHEREAS, Patamy, LLC, (“Petitioner”) is the owner of certain real property located at 10 Sullivan Road, Westminster, Maryland 21157 identified as Tax Account Number 07-048408, Map 0039, Grid 0013, Parcel 0752 (the “Property”) by virtue of a Deed dated January 15, 2025, recorded in the Land records of Carroll County at Liber 11403, Folio 354, containing ± 1.4983 acres and zoned “C-2 Commercial Medium Intensity District” under the zoning laws of Carroll County; and WHEREAS, Petitioner wishes to have the Property annexed into the City’s boundaries; and WHEREAS, the Maryland Department of Transportation State Highway Administration (“SHA”) owns certain real property containing a portion of the roadbed for College View 1 of 4 [PAGE 13] Boulevard (Maryland Route 140/Maryland Route 97), which roadbed extends from its intersection with Sullvan Road northwest approximately 448 feet along College View Boulevard and extends from the Property south approximately 150 feet to the City’s existing boundaries; and WHEREAS, Petitioner proposes that the City annex ± 1.446 acres of land owned by the SHA (the “SHA Property”) into and as part of the Property; and WHEREAS, the Property and the SHA Property collectively comprise of ± 2.9443 acres (the “Annexation Area”); and WHEREAS, the improvements Petitioner wishes to construct at the Property constitute a change in use and require a new water and sewer allocation from the City; and WHEREAS, the City has a limited supply of water and limited sewer capacity available for new development and provides water and sewer service for new development in accordance with the City’s adopted Water and Sewer Allocation Policy, which requires that property eligible for annexation under State law to be annexed as a condition of receiving water or sewer service or additional allocation from the City’s system; and WHEREAS, Petitioner understands that the City conditions new water and sewer allocations on the annexation of the Property; and WHEREAS, Petitioner solely owns the Property proposed for annexation and its petition for annexation filed under Local Gov’t Article § 4-404 satisfies the requirement in Local Gov’t Art., § 4-403 that the City obtain the consent of the owners representing at least 25% of the assessed value of the property to be annexed; and WHEREAS, no persons reside within the area to be annexed whose consent the City must obtain under Md. Code Ann., Local Gov’t Art., § 4-403; and WHEREAS, the Annexation Area consists of land that is contiguous to and adjoining the 2 of 4 [PAGE 14] City’s existing corporate boundaries, and annexing the Annexation Area will not create any unincorporated area bounded on all sides by real property within the City’s corporate limits, whether existing now, created by this legislative action, or created by a combination of both. IT IS THEREFORE RESOLVED, by the Mayor and Common Council of Westminster, to add the tracts or parcels of land designated as the Annexation Area, as shown on the Annexation Plat attached as Exhibit A and described by metes and bounds in Exhibit B attached hereto, to the City’s corporate boundaries, subject to the provisions of the Charter, City Code, Ordinances and other rules and regulations of the City of Westminster; AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, pursuant to §164-6 and all other related and applicable sections of the City Code that the Zoning Map of the City of Westminster shall be amended to include the Annexation Area in the “B Business Zone,” which permits uses substantially similar to and of substantially similar density to that permitted by Carroll County in the “C-2 Commercial Medium Intensity District;” AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Petitioner shall pay all administrative, engineering and legal fees incurred on behalf of the City of Westminster prior to the effective date of this Resolution; AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that this Resolution shall become effective forty- five (45) days following its passage and approval by the Mayor and Common Council of Westminster, unless within forty-five (45) days of the date of enactment the City receives a Petition for Referendum filed in accordance with the provisions of Md. Code Ann., Local Gov’t Article, §§ 4-408 through 4-410; AND BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Administrator shall, on or after the effective date of the Resolution, promptly send a copy of this resolution with the new boundaries 3 of 4 [PAGE 15] to the Clerk of the Circuit Court for Carroll County, and the Department of Legislative Services for the State of Maryland. INTRODUCED this ___ day of _____________ 2026 _____________________________________ Douglass A. Barber, City Clerk PASSED this ___ day of _____________ 2026 ________________________________________ Douglass A. Barber, City Clerk APPROVED this ___ day of _______________ 2026 ________________________________________ Dr. Mona Becker, Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM AND SUFFICIENCY this ___ day of _______________ 2026 __________________________________ Ramsay M. Whitworth, Esq., City Attorney 4 of 4 [PAGE 16] ANNEXATION PLAN Annexation No. 72 Location: Tax Account Number 07-048408, Map 0039, Grid 0013, Parcel 0752 (the “Property”). Acreage: ± 2.9443 acres (± 1.4983 acres Property and ± 1.446 acres SHA Right-of-Way) Property Owners: Patamy, LLC Petition: Initiated by Property Owner Current Zoning: “C-2 Commercial Medium Intensity District” under the Carroll County Zoning Ordinance Proposed Zoning: “B Business Zone” Zoning Waiver: Not required City Comprehensive Plan: The annexation area is located within the City of Westminster’s Municipal Growth Area Boundary. The property has a Land Use Designation of Commercial in the 2007 Westminster Environs Community Comprehensive Plan. Annexation No. 72 is consistent with this Land Use Designation. The property is located within the County-certified Priority Funding Area. Goal L3 states: “Provide a sustainable balance of new commercial, industrial, and residential land to meet existing and future demand.” Under this overarching land use goal, Objective 1 is to “Expand the corporate limits where appropriate to accommodate projected residential growth and provide needed jobs and services in the City.” The two policies under Objective 1 are “a. Coordinate with the County to identify parcels that are appropriate for annexation as industrial or commercial land” and “b. Extend water and sewer service to annexed lands when appropriate.” This parcel is well suited to meet this goal. Municipal Growth Element: Public Schools The City does not provide Public School service. There are no existing residents in the annexation area. The annexation area is being redeveloped for commercial use and no dwelling units are Annexation No 72 – Annexation Plan Page 1 of 3 [PAGE 17] proposed. There is no increase in population, no increase in public school enrollment, and therefore no impact on public schools. Library Services The City does not provide library services. There is no increase in population, no increase in library attendance, and therefore no impact on library services. Police / Fire / EMS The City does not provide Fire and EMS services. The Chief of Police estimates any impact on police services to be minimal because the annexation does not increase the residential population, and the nature of the proposed use is such that any increase in calls for services will be nominal. Parks & Recreation There is no increase in population, no increase in parks & recreation activity, and therefore no impact on parks & recreation services. Water & Sewerage The City does provide water and sewerage facilities. There is an increase in water service and sewer service and the additional water capacity and sewer capacity is available and may be tentatively allocated pursuant to the City Water and Sewer Allocation Policy, subject to annexation of the Property (See Resolution No. 26-03). Stormwater Management On-site stormwater management is the responsibility of the property owner. No disturbance is proposed in connection with the annexation, and therefore no impact on stormwater management facilities. Any future proposed disturbance to the annexation area shall be reviewed for possible impacts and required stormwater management improvements provided. Fiber Infrastructure: The City owns the Westminster Fiber Network, and Ting Internet is leasing the fiber in order to provide Internet service to the residents and business owners within the Westminster city limits. The property owner will be offered information regarding fiber infrastructure and connectivity. City-County Policy: The proposal meets the goals of the Westminster City-County Agreement to allow for annexation of properties within the designated Growth Area Boundary. Reference Map: The blue outline and shaded area indicate the annexation area in the Location of Property map below. Annexation No 72 – Annexation Plan Page 2 of 3 [PAGE 18] Location of Property City Boundary = Annexation Area Annexation No 72 – Annexation Plan Page 3 of 3 [PAGE 28] .5202/71/21 detnirP .1202/91/8 elbaliava etaD .56301_65_EC_ASM 4510.p 57301 DH )sdroceR dnaL( TRUOC TIUCRIC YTNUOC LLORRAC [PAGE 29] .5202/71/21 detnirP .1202/91/8 elbaliava etaD .56301_65_EC_ASM 5510.p 57301 DH )sdroceR dnaL( TRUOC TIUCRIC YTNUOC LLORRAC [PAGE 30] .5202/71/21 detnirP .1202/91/8 elbaliava etaD .56301_65_EC_ASM 6510.p 57301 DH )sdroceR dnaL( TRUOC TIUCRIC YTNUOC LLORRAC [PAGE 31] .5202/71/21 detnirP .1202/91/8 elbaliava etaD .56301_65_EC_ASM 7510.p 57301 DH )sdroceR dnaL( TRUOC TIUCRIC YTNUOC LLORRAC [PAGE 32] .5202/71/21 detnirP .1202/91/8 elbaliava etaD .56301_65_EC_ASM 8510.p 57301 DH )sdroceR dnaL( TRUOC TIUCRIC YTNUOC LLORRAC [PAGE 33] .5202/71/21 detnirP .1202/91/8 elbaliava etaD .56301_65_EC_ASM 9510.p 57301 DH )sdroceR dnaL( TRUOC TIUCRIC YTNUOC LLORRAC [PAGE 34] .5202/71/21 detnirP .1202/91/8 elbaliava etaD .56301_65_EC_ASM 0610.p 57301 DH )sdroceR dnaL( TRUOC TIUCRIC YTNUOC LLORRAC [PAGE 35] .5202/71/21 detnirP .1202/91/8 elbaliava etaD .56301_65_EC_ASM 1610.p 57301 DH )sdroceR dnaL( TRUOC TIUCRIC YTNUOC LLORRAC [PAGE 36] .5202/71/21 detnirP .1202/91/8 elbaliava etaD .56301_65_EC_ASM 2610.p 57301 DH )sdroceR dnaL( TRUOC TIUCRIC YTNUOC LLORRAC [PAGE 37] .5202/71/21 detnirP .1202/91/8 elbaliava etaD .56301_65_EC_ASM 3610.p 57301 DH )sdroceR dnaL( TRUOC TIUCRIC YTNUOC LLORRAC [PAGE 38] .5202/71/21 detnirP .1202/91/8 elbaliava etaD .56301_65_EC_ASM 4610.p 57301 DH )sdroceR dnaL( TRUOC TIUCRIC YTNUOC LLORRAC [PAGE 39] .5202/71/21 detnirP .1202/91/8 elbaliava etaD .56301_65_EC_ASM 5610.p 57301 DH )sdroceR dnaL( TRUOC TIUCRIC YTNUOC LLORRAC [PAGE 40] .5202/71/21 detnirP .1202/91/8 elbaliava etaD .56301_65_EC_ASM 6610.p 57301 DH )sdroceR dnaL( TRUOC TIUCRIC YTNUOC LLORRAC [PAGE 41] .5202/71/21 detnirP .1202/91/8 elbaliava etaD .56301_65_EC_ASM 7610.p 57301 DH )sdroceR dnaL( TRUOC TIUCRIC YTNUOC LLORRAC [PAGE 42] .5202/71/21 detnirP .1202/91/8 elbaliava etaD .56301_65_EC_ASM 8610.p 57301 DH )sdroceR dnaL( TRUOC TIUCRIC YTNUOC LLORRAC [PAGE 43] .5202/71/21 detnirP .1202/91/8 elbaliava etaD .56301_65_EC_ASM 9610.p 57301 DH )sdroceR dnaL( TRUOC TIUCRIC YTNUOC LLORRAC [PAGE 44] .5202/71/21 detnirP .1202/91/8 elbaliava etaD .56301_65_EC_ASM 0710.p 57301 DH )sdroceR dnaL( TRUOC TIUCRIC YTNUOC LLORRAC [PAGE 45] February 26, 2026 The Honorable Dr. Mona Becker 45 W. Main Street Westminster, MD 21157 Dear Mayor Becker, Thank you for providing the Maryland Department of Planning (MDP) with information pertaining to the 10 Sullivan Road annexation (Tax Map 0039, Grid 0013, Parcel 0752). MDP has reviewed your submission and offers the following comments for consideration. As you are aware, §4-416(b) of the Local Government Article specifies that the new zoning for the annexed land cannot be substantially different from the existing county zoning, without the express consent of the county commission. In reviewing this annexation request, it is the Department’s view that the proposed city zoning Business (B) appears to not be substantially different from the current county zoning Commercial Medium Intensity District (C-2) from a use perspective, as the proposed city zoning district allows for a similar range of uses. The city zoning also appears to not allow substantially higher intensity of uses than the current county zoning, as the proposed city zoning district allows for a similar range of uses, including restaurants, retail, and automobile services, although it also allows for housing. In February 2026, the county commissioners approved a site plan for a Sheetz gas station on the subject property. MDP recommends that Westminster confer with Carroll County to confirm consistency of zoning, as provided in §4-416 of the Local Government Article. Please see MDP’s attached Annexation Review for further details of our analysis. The property proposed for annexation is currently located in a county-certified Priority Funding Area (PFA) and will therefore remain designated as a PFA upon annexation. Upon the effective date of Resolution 26-03 and once MDP has received official notification of the annexation from the Department of Legislative Services, MDP will confirm that no changes have occurred since our initial review and affirm the PFA eligibility of the property. If Westminster does not want the annexation parcel to be considered for designation as a PFA, then the city should notify MDP prior to the effective date of the annexation. Enclosed you will find important information concerning post annexation notification and participation in the Census Bureau’s Boundary and Annexation Survey. The city should follow [PAGE 46] the appropriate procedures so that the annexed property is legally established as part of the incorporated municipality. MDP would like to inform the city of 2025’s Senate Bill 245 - Municipalities – Annexation Resolutions – Submission to the Department of Planning. This bill, effective October 1, 2025, requires municipalities to send a copy of the signed annexation resolution(s) to MDP within 10 days of when the resolution(s) take effect. This is an addition to the existing list of entities outlined in Section 4-414 of the Local Government Article. To expedite MDP’s updating of the PFA status, please send Daniel Mullinix (daniel.mullinix@maryland.gov) a copy of the notification transmitted to the Department of Legislative Services. If you desire further assistance please contact regional planner, Brooks Phelps, at brooks.phelps@maryland.gov Sincerely, Joe Griffiths, AICP Director, Planning Best Practices cc: Mark A. Depo, Director of Community Planning & Development, City of Westminster Andrea Gerhard, Senior Planner, City of Westminster Daphne P. Daly, Deputy Director, Carroll County Department of Planning and Land Management Susan Llareus, Planner Supervisor Brooks Phelps, Regional Planner for Central Maryland Attachments: Maryland Department of Planning Annexation Review Municipal Reporting Responsibilities Following Annexation Municipal Charter or Annexation Resolution Reposition Form [PAGE 47] Annexation Review 10 Sullivan rd, Annexation no#72 Municipality Westminster Name of Annexation 10 Sullivan rd, Annexation no#72 Resolution Number 26-03 Size of Parcels 2.94 Acres Is the property contiguous in accordance with Section 4-401? Yes Public Hearing Date Current County Zoning Commercial Medium Intensity District (C-2) Existing Density N/A Purpose of the Current County Zoning District The purpose of the C-2 District is to provide locations for a diverse range of medium-intensity retail, service and professional office uses needed by a larger population than those provided for in the C-1 District. This district is also intended to provide locations for compatible institutional and recreational uses, limited residential uses, and some of the general neighborhood uses associated with the C-1 District. Bicycle and pedestrian access are encouraged where possible to ensure compatibility with nearby neighborhoods. Permitted Use in the Current County Zoning District Agriculture, automobile services, restaurant/tavern, retail, offices, institutional uses, light industrial, and age-restricted housing/assisted living facilities. Proposed Municipal Zoning Business (B) Purpose of the Proposed Municipal Zoning District The Business Zone (B) is largely defined by the uses comprising it. In this case, the existing building is a 10-unit condominium with office uses. Permitted Use in the Proposed Municipal Zoning District Restaurant/tavern, retail, offices, institutional uses, and single-family and multi-family dwellings up to four units. Permits automobile services and light industrial uses as special exception. Are the permitted uses in the proposed municipal zoning similar to those in the county zoning? Yes Largely similar set of uses, though the proposed municipal zoning allows for housing and moves the automobile uses to special exception. Is the permitted density in the proposed municipal zoning similar to density permitted in the county zoning? Yes There is a similar intensity of uses for the two properties. The proposed municipal zoning would also allow for housing, but in February 2026 the county commissioners approved a site plan for a Sheetz gas station on the subject property. County waiver recommended? No While the municipal zoning could potentially permit housing uses at a density not permitted in county zoning, the need for a waiver is unlikely since the county already approved a Sheetz gas station on the annexation property. MDP recommends that Westminster confer with Carroll County to confirm consistency of zoning, as provided in §4-416 of the Local Government Article. Issues of State interest: N/A Is the property in a Designated Growth Area? Yes Yes, within the growth area boundary from the 2009 Westminster comprehensive plan. Is the property eligible to become a Priority Funding Area? Yes Property is in a current county PFA. March 09, 2026 Page 1 of 2 [PAGE 48] Maryland Department of Planning Reviewer: brooks.phelps@maryland.gov Date Submitted: 2/10/2026 March 09, 2026 Page 2 of 2 [PAGE 49] MUNICIPAL REPORTING RESPONSIBILITIES FOLLOWING ANNEXATION State Municipal Reporting Responsibilities There are state law municipal reporting responsibilities requiring the municipality to promptly submit certain information after an annexation is approved: 1. The Local Government Article, section § 4-414, Annotated Code of Maryland, requires that municipalities send a copy of the annexation resolution with the new boundaries to the Maryland Department of Legislative Services if an annexation is approved. Please copy the Maryland Department of Planning so that we are aware of the approved annexation boundaries. The copy of the annexation resolution, along with the Municipal Charter Or Annexation Resolution Reposition Form (below), with the new boundaries shall be sent within 10 days after the resolution takes effect to: State Department of Legislative Services Legislative Division 90 State Circle Annapolis, Maryland 21401 2. State law requires that upon annexation approval, the chief executive and administrative officer of a municipality that has annexed property forward the annexation resolution and map with the new boundary to the local municipal clerk, Clerk of the Court in the county or counties in which the municipal corporation is located and, for those municipalities in Montgomery and Prince George’s County, to the Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission. [PAGE 50] Census Bureau Boundary and Annexation Survey To ensure that persons residing on annexed land are counted as part of the municipal population, the U.S. Census Bureau periodically mails to all municipal corporations a Boundary and Annexation Survey (BAS). Following an annexation, no immediate action is required. The Census Bureau will notify the person who has been identified by the municipality as the contact person by mail and/or e- mail. Municipalities may submit boundary corrections or changes through the Bureau’s free Partnership software. In the past, the U.S. Census Bureau mailed out the BAS survey on a varying schedule based on the population size of the incorporated town. The Mayor or other municipal officials must complete the BAS, update the maps and certify that the boundary shown reflects the legal corporate limits as of January 1 of the survey year. Boundary information must be returned to the Census Bureau by March 1st of the survey year to be properly recorded for the Census Bureau’s annual population estimates and American Community Survey products. The purpose of the Survey is to obtain the most accurate boundary information, including boundary changes due to annexations, detachments, mergers, or other reasons. These boundary changes are incorporated into the Census Bureau’s files and used for tabulating Census data. The BAS information is used to provide an appropriate record for reporting the results of the decennial and economic censuses, and annual surveys such as the Population Estimates Program and the American Community Survey. Maryland Department of Planning can assist municipalities in updating their boundary information. Questions regarding the Census Bureau’s Boundary and Annexation Survey or assistance in submitting the BAS may be referred to Alfred Sundara at the Maryland Department of Planning at 410-767-4002 or alfred.sundara@maryland.gov. Additional information about the Census Bureau’s BAS program is available at the following link https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/bas.html [PAGE 51] MUNICIPAL CHARTER OR ANNEXATION RESOLUTION REPOSITION FORM Section 4-109 of the Local Government Article of the Annotated Code of Maryland requires municipal officials to deposit certain municipal documents with the Department of Legislative Services. Please use this registration form for each resolution that alters the charter or the boundaries of your municipal corporation. Complete a separate form for each resolution, and mail the entire text of the resolution, along with this form to: Georgeanne Carter, Legislative Counsel Municipal Resolution Reposition Department of Legislative Services 90 State Circle Annapolis, MD 21401-1991 Municipal Corporation County(ies) Name and Title of Official Submitting this Resolution Address Phone Date of Submitting this Resolution* Resolution Number Date Enacted by Legislative Body Effective Date** 1) For an annexation resolution, state the charter section (e.g., boundary description section, appendix) that is amended OR state the charter section (e.g., general powers section) pursuant to which the property is annexed . (Enclose a copy of the metes and bounds description of the complete boundaries of your municipal corporation that includes the newly annexed property, including the number of acres and the point of beginning coordinates for the newly annexed property.) For a charter resolution, state whether the entire charter is repealed and a new charter is adopted OR state the specific section(s) that is added, repealed, renumbered, or repealed and reenacted with amendments . 2) Number of votes cast by the legislative body for and against this resolution. 3) Will this resolution be petitioned to referendum? If “yes”, date of the referendum election (if known) . * A resolution should be submitted to the Department of Legislative Services 10 days after the effective date of the resolution (§ 4-109(b) of the Local Government Article). Generally, provided that a resolution is not petitioned to referendum, the effective date for a charter resolution is 50 days after enactment (§ 4- 304(c) of the Local Government Article), and for an annexation resolution is no earlier than 45 days after enactment (§ 4-407 of the Local Government Article). DLS/9-14 [PAGE 52] Item B: ZMA 24-01, PZC Recommendation To: Planning and Zoning Commission From: Mark A. Depo, Director of Community Planning and Development Meeting Date: April 16, 2026 Re: Recommendation to Mayor and Common Council for Zoning Map Amendment ZMA 24-01, a Zoning Map amendment reclassifying certain real property from the R- 7,500 Residential Zone to the Planned Development-9 Zone. The Department of Community Planning and Development (DCPD) is requesting the City of Westminster Planning and Zoning Commission (PZC) review and forward the Commission’s recommendation for ZMA-24-01 to the Mayor and Common Council. ZONAL CLASSIFICATION REQUEST D.R. Acquisitions, LLC (the “Applicant”), submitted a request and concept development plan (Option 1) and architectural elevations (Option A) for The Willows (hereafter "Development Plan") to amend the Zoning Map to reclassify certain real property located in the City of Westminster from the R- 7,500 Residential Zone (R-7,500 Zone) to the PD-9 Planned Development-9 Zone (PD-9 Zone) to construct 20 two-over-two dwellings for a total of 40 dwelling units. = Property [PAGE 53] The subject properties, State Department of Assessments and Taxation (SDAT) #07-020430, #07- 114443, #07-033338, #07-011490, #07-011482, #07-032471, #07-032455, and #07-044429 (the “Property”), are zoned R-7,500 Residential Zone (R-7,500 Zone) and are subject to the City of Westminster Zoning Ordinance (the “Zoning Ordinance”). The Property is located in the southeast quadrant of the intersection of Maryland Route 140 and Pennsylvania Avenue in the City of Westminster. In 2006 the Property was annexed into the City of Westminster (Annexation No. 56; R-05-01). The Property contains approximately 4.731 acres of land. The Property has a land use designation of Urban Residential in the City of Westminster Comprehensive Plan, as amended in 2017. The Comprehensive Plan states “The majority of land designated for Urban Residential development is located within the older developed sections of the City. This is a high-density residential classification which allows for five to six units per acre and a mixture of housing types.” The Property is located within the W-1 Water Service Area and S-1 Sewer Service Area. Background On May 29, 2024, ZMA 24-01 was introduced to the Commission and the Commission voted to forward ZMA 24-01 to a future work session. On August 29, 2024, the Commission held a work session on ZMA 24-01. The Commission discussed architectural elevations and three conceptual site layouts (Option 1 – 3) provided by the Applicant for the proposed two-over-two 40-unit residential development. The Commission chose to move forward with the Option 3 conceptual site layout. April 16, 2026 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting ZMA 24-01 Recommendation to Mayor and Common Council Page 2 of 7 [PAGE 54] On October 17, 2024, the PZC held a Public Hearing for ZMA 24-01. The PZC closed the public hearing but left the record open until 4:30 pm on October 31, 2024 and voted to forward ZMA 24-01 to a future work session. On November 21, 2024, the PZC was scheduled to hold a work session for ZMA 24-01, however the Applicant requested a continuance. The PZC voted to amend its agenda to continue ZMA 24-01 to a future PZC meeting. On February 20, 2025, May 15, 2025, and December 17, 2025, the PZC held a work session for ZMA 24-01 and discussed architectural elevations. On February 17, 2026, The PZC reviewed two options provided by the Applicant that reflected the previous Planning Commission’s direction regarding architecture. Option A Option B The Commission was split on which elevation should be forwarded to the Mayor and Common Council and ultimately voted to forward both elevation options to the Mayor and Common Council with a favorable recommendation. However, when forwarding Option A, the Commission requested that Option A be amended to include a bump out feature that wraps around the middle of the building encapsulating the window to provide more variation in the design. April 16, 2026 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting ZMA 24-01 Recommendation to Mayor and Common Council Page 3 of 7 [PAGE 55] On March 19, 2026, the Planning and Zoning Commission voted to forward ZMA 24-01 to the Mayor and Common Council with a positive recommendation including the planned development plan Option 3 and architectural elevations Option A, as further amended, and Option B, approved by the Commission. ZONING MAP AMENDMENT Zoning Map Amendment Pursuant to City of Westminster Zoning Ordinance (the “Zoning Ordinance”) Section 164-176, an application for an amendment to the Zoning Map covering a single tract, all portions of which are proposed to be classified in one zone, is a local map amendment. Pursuant to Zoning Ordinance Section 164-177 A. (2), Local amendment, “An application for a local amendment to the Zoning Map may be made by any governmental agency or by any person with a financial, contractual or proprietary interest in the property to be affected by the proposed amendment.” The Applicant is the contract purchaser of the Property. Local map amendments to rezone a property to the P-I Planned Industrial Zone, PD-4 Planned Development-4 Zone, and PD-9 Planned Development-9 Zone, which are floating zones, are considered zonal classifications and processed as a Zoning Map Amendment (ZMA). As the request is to reclassify the R-7,500 Zone with the PD-9 Zone floating zone, the Applicant does not have to meet the stringent legal standard for “change or mistake” as is required for an individual or piecemeal rezoning. Article XIV PD-9 Planned Development-9 Zone The Zoning Administrator has previously determined that a two-over-two dwelling is equivalent to a single-family attached dwelling. Pursuant to Zoning Ordinance Article XIV, Section 164-89 G., “Single-family attached dwellings” is a permitted use in the PD-9 Zone. Pursuant to Zoning Ordinance Article XIV, Section 164-91 A. “Area requirements. A site eligible for consideration as a Planned Development - 9 Zone shall consist of a tract of land not exceeding 10 acres in size, including particularly vacant tracts of land on which any existing building or buildings are sufficiently obsolete and are not of significant historic or architectural value so as to warrant replacement and redevelopment and classified in the R-7,500 Zone prior to reclassification to the PD- 9 Zone.” At this time, the land area intended to be rezoned PD-9 Zone consists of eight tracts of land with, as stated on the Development Plan, a combined area of 4.7313 acres. For the request to be eligible for rezoning to the PD-9 Zone, the tracts of land must be consolidated into a single 4.7313 acre tract of land. Pursuant to Zoning Ordinance Article XIV, Section 164-91 B. “Density. (1) Residential density shall be approved generally on the capabilities of the existing and/or planned utilities and such other standards and requirements as enumerated in this chapter, but in no case shall density exceed nine dwelling units per net acre. (2) Calculation of net acreage shall include all land within the planned development, except floodplain areas and slopes in excess of 25%.” The Development Plan states the net tract area is 4.5145 acres, which would allow for a density of 40 dwelling units at 9 dwelling units April 16, 2026 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting ZMA 24-01 Recommendation to Mayor and Common Council Page 4 of 7 [PAGE 56] per acre. The Development Plan is proposing 20 two-over-two dwellings for a total of 40 dwelling units. Pursuant to Zoning Ordinance Article XIV, Section 164-91 C., “Lot area, lot width and yard requirements”, “(3) There shall not be more than six single-family attached dwellings in any one attached row. In any one row of single-family attached dwellings there shall be no more than three continuous single-family attached dwellings with the same building line, and the variations in building line must be at least two feet.” The Development Plan proposes no more than six single- family attached dwellings in any one attached row. Pursuant to Zoning Ordinance Article XIV, Section 164-92, Building height, “Maximum principal building height shall not exceed three stories or 40 feet in height. No accessory structure shall exceed two stories or 20 feet in height.” Pursuant to Zoning Ordinance Article XIV, Section 164-93, Open Space, “A. Twenty percent of the net project area shall be dedicated and deeded without charge to the City for common open space. The City may waive the right to such dedication to it and instead may require the open space areas be deeded to, improved, operated and maintained by a property owners' association of the residents of a PD-9 Zone project.” The purpose of the open space is to be usable space that is accessible to City residents, including the PD-9 community. It is unclear how useable, accessible and/or safe the proposed open space locations are for the residents, due to the size, separation, and location of the open space, particularly around the stormwater management facilities. The Development Plan open space locations that are less than 0.1 acres of land. Pursuant to Zoning Ordinance Section 164-94, Off-street parking, “Off-street parking shall be provided in accordance with Article XVI of this chapter.” The Zoning Administrator has determined that each two-over-two dwelling unit requires 5 parking spaces. Therefore, the total number of parking spaces required is 100 (20 two-over-two dwelling units x 5). Pursuant to Zoning Ordinance Article XIV, Section 164-98, Procedure: “A. An application for zonal classification in the PD-9 Zone shall be accompanied by a development plan prepared in accordance with the provisions of § 164-188 of this chapter. B. In addition to all other standards and criteria in considering an application for the PD-9 Zone, the Common Council shall also consider the present or potential adequacy of schools, the capability of the street or road system, highway and road access and the availability, capability of existing water and sewage systems and the availability and capability of all other public facilities. C. All PD-9 Zone projects shall be subject to site plan approval as provided in Article XXV.” Pursuant to Zoning Ordinance Article XXIII, Amendments, Section 164-188, Planned Development: “B. In order to assist in achieving the flexibility of design needed for the implementation of the purposes of certain planned development zones, a development plan must be submitted as a part of the application for reclassification of land to the planned development zones set forth in April 16, 2026 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting ZMA 24-01 Recommendation to Mayor and Common Council Page 5 of 7 [PAGE 57] Articles XIA, XII, XIII and XIV of this chapter. Approval of the application for rezoning must include explicit approval of a development plan. Development of land must be in substantial accordance with an approved development plan or an approved amended development plan. Modification of road alignments, unit types or site planning designs which do not increase the approved density of the project shall not constitute a substantial change in the development plan unless the Commission considers such a change to have an adverse impact on the adjacent properties or general character of the approved development plan. C. The application process for all planned developments shall follow the same process, whether they are divided into multiple phases or not. The process will consist of three stages: rezoning (development plan approval), subdivision (culminating with the final plat) and building permit (site plan approval). In the event that the development includes multiple phases, separate applications for subdivision and building permit will be required for each separate development phase.” Pursuant to Zoning Ordinance Article XXIII, Amendments, Section 164-97, Compatibility. “All uses permitted and special exceptions shall achieve the purposes set forth in § 164-88 and be compatible with the other uses proposed for the planned development and with the other uses existing or proposed adjacent to and in the vicinity of the area covered by the proposed planned development. A. In order to assist in accomplishing such compatibility, the following requirements shall apply where a PD-9 Zone project adjoins an existing single-family detached dwelling neighborhood or land classified in the R-10,000 or R-7,500 Zones, but compliance with these requirements shall not in and of itself be deemed to create a presumption of compatibility. (1) No building, other than a single-family detached dwelling, shall be constructed within 100 feet of the nearest existing dwelling; and (2) All single-family detached dwellings constructed within 100 feet of the nearest existing dwelling shall comply with the minimum development standards of the zonal classifications of the adjoining land. B. The Commission shall have the discretion to increase or decrease the strict application of the requirements contained in Subsection A(1) and (2) hereof in instances in which the adjoining property or properties will not be adversely affected by such increase or decrease.” Pursuant to City of Westminster Zoning Ordinance (the “Zoning Ordinance”) Section 164-176, an application for an amendment to the Zoning Map covering a single tract, all portions of which are proposed to be classified in one zone, is a local map amendment. Pursuant to Zoning Ordinance Section 164-177 A. (2), Local amendment, “An application for a local amendment to the Zoning Map may be made by any governmental agency or by any person with a financial, contractual or proprietary interest in the property to be affected by the proposed amendment.” The Applicant is the contract purchaser of the Property. April 16, 2026 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting ZMA 24-01 Recommendation to Mayor and Common Council Page 6 of 7 [PAGE 58] Local map amendments to rezone a property to the P-I Planned Industrial Zone, PD-4 Planned Development-4 Zone, and PD-9 Planned Development-9 Zone, which are floating zones, are considered zonal classifications and processed as a Zoning Map Amendment (ZMA). As the request is to reclassify the R-7,500 Zone with the PD-9 Zone floating zone, the Applicant does not have to meet the stringent legal standard for “change or mistake” as is required for an individual or piecemeal rezoning. Process Following acceptance of the of the zoning map amendment application, the Zoning Administrator shall forward the application to be introduced to the Planning and Zoning Commission (the “Commission”) at its next meeting for informational purposes. (On May 29, 2024, ZMA 24-01 was introduced to the Commission) In addition, the Zoning Administrator will notify the Commission of its public hearing date for the application. (On May 29, 2024, following the introduction of ZMA 24- 01, the Commission voted to forward ZMA 24-01 to a future work session. On August 29, 2023, the Planning and Zoning Commission held a work session for ZMA 24-01 and following the work session voted to forward ZMA 24-01 to public hearing. On October 17, 2024, the PZC held a public hearing for ZMA 24-01. The PZC closed the public hearing but left the record open until 4:30 pm on October 31, 2024 and voted to forward ZMA 24-01 to a future work session. On February 20, 2025, the PZC held a work session for ZMA 24-01. On May 15, 2025, the PZC is scheduled to hold a work session for ZMA 24-01. The purpose of this scheduled work session is to discuss the recommendation that will be forwarded to Mayor and Common Council) The Zoning Administrator shall set the application for hearing at a specified date, time and place and shall cause to be published in at least one newspaper of general circulation in the county, once each week for two successive weeks (the first publication of notice shall appear at least 15 days prior to the hearing) notice of the public hearing on such application, stating the application number, date, time and place of hearing and the summary of the amendment and the location of the property, its area, name of owner, and change of classification. (The Planning and Zoning Commission Notice of Public Hearing for ZMA 24-01, was advertised on October 2, 2024, 15 days prior to the hearing, and October 9, 2024, in the Carroll County Times. [Zoning Ordinance Section 164-185 A.]) Following the public hearing, the Planning and Zoning Commission shall submit a report and recommendation to the Zoning Administrator. On March 19, 2026, the Planning and Zoning Commission voted to forward ZMA 24-01 to the Mayor and Common Council with a positive recommendation including the planned development plan Option 3 and architectural elevations Option A, as further amended, and Option B, approved by the Commission. RECOMMENDATION DCPD Staff recommends the Planning and Zoning Commission review and forward the Commission’s recommendation for ZMA-24-01 to the Mayor and Common Council. ATTACHMENTS 1. Planning and Zoning Commission Recommendation Letter 2. Draft Ordinance for ZMA-24-01 April 16, 2026 Planning and Zoning Commission Meeting ZMA 24-01 Recommendation to Mayor and Common Council Page 7 of 7 [PAGE 59] WESTMINSTER PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION Re: Zoning Map Amendment, amending the Zoning Map for real property located off and east of Pennsylvania Avenue and north of Sullivan Avenue, reclassifying certain real property from the R-7,500 Residential Zone to the Planned Development-9 Zone. To: Mayor and Common Council From: Planning and Zoning Commission Date: April 16, 2026 BACKGROUND D.R. Acquisitions, LLC (the “Applicant”) requests approval of a Zoning Map Amendment and associated Development Plan for a project known as The Willows. The Applicant seeks to reclassify certain real property located in the City of Westminster from the R-7,500 Residential Zone (“R-7,500 Zone”) to the PD-9 Planned Development-9 Zone (“PD-9 Zone”) in order to develop the site with 20 two-over-two dwellings (stacked units) for a total of 40 dwelling units. The subject properties, State Department of Assessments and Taxation (SDAT) #07- 020430, #07-114443, #07-033338, #07-011490, #07-011482, #07-032471, #07-032455, and #07- 044429 (the “Property”), are currently zoned R-7,500 Zone and are subject to the City of Westminster Zoning Ordinance (the “Zoning Ordinance”). The Property is located in the southeast quadrant of the intersection of Maryland Route 140 and Pennsylvania Avenue in the City of Westminster. In 2006, the City annexed the Property (Annexation No. 56; R-05-01). The Property contains approximately 4.731 acres. The Property has a land use designation of Urban Residential in the City of Westminster Comprehensive Plan, as amended in 2017. The Comprehensive Plan states that Urban Residential areas are intended to accommodate higher-density residential development, generally allowing five to six units per acre and a mixture of housing types. The Property is located within the W-1 Water Service Area and S-1 Sewer Service Area. PROCEDURAL HISTORY Following acceptance of the application, the Zoning Administrator forwarded ZMA 24-01 to the Planning and Zoning Commission (the “Commission”) for introduction and scheduled the required public hearing in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance. On May 29, 2024, the Commission received and introduced ZMA 24-01 and voted to schedule a work session. On August 29, 2024, the Commission held a work session to review the application, including architectural elevations and three conceptual site layout options, Option 1, Option 2, and Option 3. Following the work session, the Commission voted to advance ZMA 24- 01 to a public hearing. 1 [PAGE 60] On October 17, 2024, the Commission held a public hearing on ZMA 24-01. The Commission closed the public hearing but kept the record open until 4:30 p.m. on October 31, 2024, and voted to continue the application to a future work session. The Commission scheduled a work session for November 21, 2024; however, the Applicant requested a continuance, and the Commission voted to continue the application to a future meeting. The Commission subsequently held additional work sessions on February 20, 2025, May 15, 2025, and December 17, 2025 to review architectural elevations and site design. On February 17, 2026, the Commission reviewed two revised architectural elevation options, Option A and Option B, submitted by the Applicant in response to prior Commission direction. The Commission was divided on a preferred elevation and ultimately voted to forward both options to the Mayor and Common Council with a favorable recommendation. In forwarding Option A, the Commission requested that the Applicant revise the design to incorporate a bump- out feature to provide additional architectural variation. In accordance with the Zoning Ordinance, the Zoning Administrator scheduled the public hearing and published legal notice in a newspaper of general circulation once per week for two consecutive weeks, with the first notice published at least 15 days prior to the hearing. The City published notice of the public hearing for ZMA 24-01 in the Carroll County Times on October 2, 2024, and October 9, 2024. The notice included the application number, hearing date, time, and location, as well as a summary of the proposed amendment, property location, acreage, ownership, and requested zoning classification. Following the public hearing and work sessions, the Commission prepared and forwarded this report and recommendation to the Zoning Administrator for transmittal to the Mayor and Common Council. ZONING MAP AMENDMENT Pursuant to Section 164-176 of the Zoning Ordinance, an application that proposes to reclassify a single tract into one zoning district constitutes a local map amendment. Pursuant to Section 164-177.A(2) of the Zoning Ordinance, “[a]n application for a local amendment to the Zoning Map may be made by any governmental agency or by any person with a financial, contractual or proprietary interest in the property to be affected by the proposed amendment.” The Applicant qualifies as such a party because it is the contract purchaser of the Property. The Zoning Ordinance treats requests to apply the P-I Planned Industrial Zone, PD-4 Planned Development-4 Zone, and PD-9 Planned Development-9 Zone as “floating zones.” The City processes these requests as Zoning Map Amendments (“ZMA”) that establish a new zoning classification for the subject property. Because the Applicant requests approval of the PD-9 floating zone to replace the existing R-7,500 Zone, the Applicant does not need to satisfy the “change or mistake” standard that applies to piecemeal rezoning cases. 2 [PAGE 61] DEVELOPMENT PLAN The Zoning Administrator previously determined that a two-over-two dwelling is equivalent to a single-family attached dwelling. Pursuant to Zoning Ordinance Article XIV, Section 164-89.G, “single-family attached dwellings” are a permitted use in the PD-9 Zone. Pursuant to Zoning Ordinance Article XIV, Section 164-91 A. “Area requirements,” a PD- 9 Zone must consist of a single tract not exceeding 10 acres in size. The Development Plan identifies eight separate parcels totaling approximately 4.7313 acres. For the request to be eligible for rezoning to the PD-9 Zone, the Applicant must consolidate these parcels into a single tract. Pursuant to Zoning Ordinance Article XIV, Section 164-91 B. “Density,” residential density may not exceed nine dwelling units per net acre. The Development Plan identifies a net tract area of 4.5145 acres, which permits up to 40 dwelling units at the maximum density. The Development Plan proposes 20 two-over-two dwellings for a total of 40 dwelling units and therefore meets the maximum permitted density. Pursuant to Zoning Ordinance Article XIV, Section 164-91 C., “Lot area, lot width and yard requirements.” no more than six single-family attached dwellings may be included in any one row, and building line variation is required. The Development Plan indicates no more than six single-family attached dwellings in any one attached row. Pursuant to Zoning Ordinance Article XIV, Section 164-92, “Building height,” the maximum principal building height may not exceed three stories or 40 feet. Pursuant to Zoning Ordinance Article XIV, Section 164-93, “Open space,” the Applicant must provide open space equal to at least 20 percent of the net project area, either through dedication to the City or through a property owners’ association. The purpose of this open space is to provide usable and accessible areas for residents. The Development Plan does not clearly demonstrate that the proposed open space areas – particularly those located around stormwater management facilities – will be usable, accessible, or safe for residents. Several proposed open space areas are less than 0.1 acres in size, which may further limit usability. Pursuant to Zoning Ordinance Section 164-94, “Off-street parking,” off-street parking must comply with Article XVI. The Zoning Administrator determined that each two-over-two dwelling requires five parking spaces. Therefore, the Development Plan requires a total of 100 parking spaces (20 units × 5 spaces). Pursuant to Zoning Ordinance Article XIV, Section 164-98, “Procedure”: A. An application for zonal classification in the PD-9 Zone shall be accompanied by a development plan prepared in accordance with the provisions of § 164-188 of this chapter. B. In addition to all other standards and criteria in considering an application for the PD-9 Zone, the Common Council shall also 3 [PAGE 62] consider the present or potential adequacy of schools, the capability of the street or road system, highway and road access and the availability, capability of existing water and sewage systems and the availability and capability of all other public facilities. C. All PD-9 Zone projects shall be subject to site plan approval as provided in Article XXV. Pursuant to Zoning Ordinance Article XXIII, Section 164-188, “Planned Development”: B. In order to assist in achieving the flexibility of design needed for the implementation of the purposes of certain planned development zones, a development plan must be submitted as a part of the application for reclassification of land to the planned development zones set forth in Articles XIA, XII, XIII and XIV of this chapter. Approval of the application for rezoning must include explicit approval of a development plan. Development of land must be in substantial accordance with an approved development plan or an approved amended development plan. Modification of road alignments, unit types or site planning designs which do not increase the approved density of the project shall not constitute a substantial change in the development plan unless the Commission considers such a change to have an adverse impact on the adjacent properties or general character of the approved development plan. C. The application process for all planned developments shall follow the same process, whether they are divided into multiple phases or not. The process will consist of three stages: rezoning (development plan approval), subdivision (culminating with the final plat) and building permit (site plan approval). In the event that the development includes multiple phases, separate applications for subdivision and building permit will be required for each separate development phase. Pursuant to Zoning Ordinance Article XIV, Section 164-97, “Compatibility”: All uses permitted and special exceptions shall achieve the purposes set forth in § 164-88 and be compatible with the other uses proposed for the planned development and with the other uses existing or proposed adjacent to and in the vicinity of the area covered by the proposed planned development. A. In order to assist in accomplishing such compatibility, the following requirements shall apply where a PD-9 Zone project adjoins an existing single-family detached dwelling neighborhood or land classified in the R-10,000 or R-7,500 Zones, but compliance 4 [PAGE 63] with these requirements shall not in and of itself be deemed to create a presumption of compatibility. (1) No building, other than a single-family detached dwelling, shall be constructed within 100 feet of the nearest existing dwelling; and (2) All single-family detached dwellings constructed within 100 feet of the nearest existing dwelling shall comply with the minimum development standards of the zonal classifications of the adjoining land. B. The Commission shall have the discretion to increase or decrease the strict application of the requirements contained in Subsection A(1) and (2) hereof in instances in which the adjoining property or properties will not be adversely affected by such increase or decrease. ANALYSIS The Commission reviewed all documents and testimony in the record for ZMA 24-01, including the Staff Report and the architectural drawings for the Property. Based on their review, the Commission made the following findings: 1. Permitted Use The Zoning Administrator has determined that two-over-two dwellings are equivalent to single-family attached dwellings. The PD-9 Zone permits single-family attached dwellings. Therefore, the proposed residential use is permitted within the PD-9 Zone. 2. Tract Size and Eligibility The proposed rezoning area totals approximately 4.731 acres, which falls within the maximum 10-acre size permitted for the PD-9 Zone. However, the property currently consists of eight separate parcels. The Applicant must consolidate these parcels into a single tract prior to or as part of development to meet the eligibility requirements of the PD-9 Zone. 3. Density The Development Plan identifies a net tract area of approximately 4.5145 acres. At a maximum density of nine dwelling units per acre, the site can support up to 40 dwelling units. The Applicant proposes exactly 40 units. Therefore, the proposed density meets, but does not exceed, the maximum density permitted by the Zoning Ordinance. 5 [PAGE 64] 4. Development Standards The Development Plan indicates that no more than six single-family attached dwellings will be included in any one building row, consistent with PD-9 requirements. The Applicant must also ensure compliance with required building line variation at the time of detailed site plan review. 5. Building Height The Zoning Ordinance limits principal structures in the PD-9 Zone to a maximum of three stories or 40 feet in height. The Applicant must demonstrate compliance with this requirement during site plan review. 6. Open Space The Zoning Ordinance requires that twenty percent of the net project area shall be dedicated and deeded without charge to the City for common open space. The Development Plan identifies areas designated as usable open space; however, several of these areas are relatively small and located adjacent to stormwater management facilities, which may limit their overall functionality and cohesiveness. Pursuant to § 164-93A, the Commission recommends that the City waive the right to such dedication and instead require that the open space areas be deeded to, improved, operated, and maintained by a property owners’ association consisting of the residents of the PD- 9 Zone project. The Commission further recommends that the developer provide a fee in lieu of the typical open space dedication requirement, with the amount of such fee to be determined at the time of site plan review. 7. Off-Street Parking The Zoning Administrator has determined that each two-over-two dwelling requires five parking spaces. Based on 20 units, the development requires 100 parking spaces. The Applicant must demonstrate that the Development Plan can accommodate the required parking in compliance with Article XVI of the Zoning Ordinance. 8. Adequacy of Public Facilities The property is located within designated water and sewer service areas. At the rezoning stage, the Applicant has not demonstrated any deficiencies in public facilities; however, the Mayor and Common Council must consider the adequacy of schools, transportation infrastructure, and public utilities prior to approval. 9. Development Plan Compliance The Applicant has submitted a Development Plan in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance. If approved, the development must substantially conform to the approved plan unless amended in accordance with applicable procedures. The project will be subject to subsequent subdivision and site plan approval. 6 [PAGE 65] 10. Compatibility with Surrounding Uses The surrounding area includes residential zoning classifications. The Zoning Ordinance requires that PD-9 developments be compatible with adjacent uses, including setbacks and buffering where the development adjoins existing single-family neighborhoods. The Applicant must demonstrate compliance with applicable compatibility standards, including any required setbacks within 100 feet of existing dwellings, at the time of site plan review. The Commission may adjust these standards if it determines that such adjustments will not adversely affect adjacent properties. The Commission finds that the proposed Development Plan generally meets the requirements of Article XIV and Article XXIII, Section 164-188, and is capable of fulfilling the purposes and intent of the PD-9 Zone, subject to the conditions and clarifications identified in this report. RECOMMENDATION Based on the findings of fact above, the Commission recommends that the Mayor and Common Council approve Local Map Amendment ZMA 24-01 to reclassify the Property from the R-7,500 Zone to the PD-9 Planned Development-9 Zone. The Commission further recommends approval of the concept development plan (Option 3) and the architectural elevations, including Option A, as amended, or Option B, as approved by the Commission. 7 [PAGE 66] ORDINANCE NO. 26-** AN ORDINANCE OF THE MAYOR AND COMMON COUNCIL OF WESTMINSTER, AMENDING THE CITY’S COMPREHENSIVE ZONING MAP WITH RESPECT TO CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST QUADRANT OF THE INTERSECTION OF MARYLAND ROUTE 140 AND PENNSYLVANIA AVENUE (THE “PROPERTY”), DESIGNATED AS TAX ACCOUNTS 07- 020430, 07-114443, 07-033338, 07-011490, 07-011482, 07-032471, 07-032455, AND 07-044429, AND CURRENTLY ZONED R-7,500 RESIDENTIAL ZONE (R-7,500), TO RECLASSIFY THE PROPERTY TO THE PD-9 PLANNED DEVELOPMENT-9 ZONE (PD-9). (Local Map Amendment ZMA 24-01) WHEREAS, pursuant to the Local Government Article of the Annotated Code of Maryland, §5-213, the Mayor and Common Council of Westminster (the “Council”) have the authority to adopt reasonable zoning regulations, subject to referendum, to promote the public health, safety, welfare, and morals; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Sections 11 through 18 of the City Charter, the Council may divide the City into zoning districts and regulate the erection, construction, reconstruction, alteration, repair, or use of buildings, structures, or land in accordance with a comprehensive plan, with consideration of the character of districts, their suitability for particular uses, and the goal of conserving property values and encouraging the most appropriate land use; and WHEREAS, the City adopted a comprehensive zoning map on or about October 25, 2010, CMA 10-1, through Ordinance No. 819, and has since maintained and updated the Zoning Ordinance codified in Chapter 164 of the Westminster City Code; and WHEREAS, the Zoning Ordinance establishes the PD-9 Planned Development-9 Zone as a floating zone that may be applied to eligible property through a Zoning Map Amendment; and WHEREAS, the contract purchaser of the Property, D.R. Acquisitions, LLC (the “Applicant”), submitted an application for Local Map Amendment ZMA 24-01 to reclassify the Property from the R-7,500 Zone to the PD-9 Zone, along with a concept development plan (Option 3) and architectural elevations (Options A, as amended, and B, as approved) for the proposed development of 20 two-over-two dwellings totaling 40 units (the “Development Plan”); and WHEREAS, pursuant to § 164-183, the City’s Planning and Zoning Commission (the “Commission”) is charged with reviewing proposed amendments to the comprehensive zoning map and submitting a report and recommendation to the Council with respect to such proposed amendments; and WHEREAS, the Commission conducted a public hearing, held multiple work sessions, [PAGE 67] reviewed the Development Plan, and submitted a Report and Recommendation, attached hereto as Exhibit A, recommending approval of the requested zoning map amendment and development plan; and WHEREAS, the Commission found that the proposed Development Plan complies with the requirements of Chapter 164, Articles XIV and XXIII, provides for the safety, convenience, and amenity of future residents, and is compatible with surrounding land uses; and WHEREAS, the Commission further found that the public interest is served by reclassifying the Property to PD-9 to allow the proposed development while preserving compatibility with surrounding properties and supporting orderly growth consistent with the Comprehensive Plan; and WHEREAS, the Mayor and Common Council adopt the findings of the Planning and Zoning Commission and find the Application meets the criteria for approval. Section 1. NOW THEREFORE BE IT ENACTED AND ORDAINED by the Mayor and Common Council of Westminster, that the Report and Recommendation of the Planning and Zoning Commission is hereby adopted and incorporated by reference as the decision of the Council. Section 2. AND BE IT FURTHER ENACTED AND ORDAINED that the Comprehensive Zoning Map Amendment shall be amended to reclassify the Property from the R- 7,500 Residential Zone to the PD-9 Planned Development-9 Zone. Section 3. AND BE IT FURTHER ENACTED AND ORDAINED that the approved Development Plan, including Concept Plan Option 3 and architectural elevations Option A (as amended) or Option B (as approved), shall govern the development of the Property, and any modifications must comply with applicable provisions of the Zoning Ordinance. Section 4. AND BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED that this Ordinance shall take effect ten (10) days after its passage and approval. INTRODUCED this ____ day of __________, 2026. Douglass A Barber, City Clerk ADOPTED this ____ day of ___________, 2026. Douglass A. Barber, City Clerk 2 of 3 [PAGE 68] APPROVED this _____ day of ___________, 2026. Dr. Mona Becker, Mayor APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGAL SUFFICIENCY this ___ day of _________, 2026 Ramsay M. Whitworth, City Attorney 3 of 3