[PAGE 1]
VILLAGE OF PELHAM BOARD OF TRUSTEES
REGULAR MEETING MINUTES
TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 10, 2026, 8:07 PM
MUNICIPAL CENTER - 200 FIFTH AVENUE, PELHAM, NY 10803
Join by Zoom Video:
https://zoom.us/j/98917409392?pwd=U09KN2MxTnJHWEU2Nm9ndWxQSEgwZz09
Join by Telephone: (929) 205-6099
Meeting ID: 989 1740 9392
Passcode: 030699
AGENDA ITEMS
1. Call to Order
2. Pledge of Allegiance
3. Roll Call
4. Village Trustees’ Reports
5. Village Administrator’s Report
6. Mayor’s Report
7. Public Comments
Non-Recurring Items
8. Resolution Authorizing Street Closure for Pelham Little League Parade
9. Discussion on Celebrating America250 with NYCOM
10. Resolution Authorizing the Execution of a Memorandum of Understanding and Escrow
Agreement between the Village of Pelham and Potential Redeveloper – PHP Partners, LLC.
11. Discussion on Calendar for Fiscal Year 2026-27 Budget Process
12. Other Business - Resolution Authorizing the Execution of an Agreement Concerning the
Parking Enforcement Platform (Judicial Ethics Opinion and Access Control); Town of Pelham
Sustainability Advisory Board – Village Representation
Recurring Items
13. Authorizing Accounts Payable
14. Authorizing Minutes of: January 27, 2026 Work Session and Regular Meeting
15. Adjournment
Next Regularly Scheduled BOT Meetings:
Tuesday, February 24, 2026
Tuesday, March 10, 2026

[PAGE 2]
Village Board of Trustees Regular Meeting Tuesday, February 10, 2026
Item # 1 - Meeting Called to Order: Mayor Mullen called the meeting to order at 8:07 PM.
Item # 2 - Pledge of Allegiance: Mayor Mullen led the pledge at 8:07 PM.
Item # 3 - Roll Call:
Attendee Name Present Absent Late
Mayor Mullen
☒ ☐ ☐
Deputy Mayor Carpenter
☒ ☐ ☐
Village Trustee Anderson
☒ ☐ ☐
Village Trustee Eldahry
☒ ☐ ☐
Village Trustee Howell
☒ ☐ ☐
Village Trustee Otondi
☐ ☐ ☒
Village Trustee Solomon
☒ ☐ ☐
Village Administrator Scelza (Virtual)
☒ ☐ ☐
Item # 4 - Village Trustees’ Report:
Village Trustee Anderson – Our DPW has remained busy with the snow storm from a few weeks ago.
There have been weeks of record breaking cold, and the crew has done an incredible job under
difficult circumstances. For the past 2 weeks they have been widening the main roads overnight and
are working section by section. Just a reminder that residents can use the MyVOP app to directly
connect to services, report local issues, and stay updated on news and events. Along with this, our
Village website contains a heading that says “Village News Updates” on the front page. Today an
update was provided regarding the new Sanitation Schedule for next week due to the upcoming
holiday. Finally, Trustee Anderson is inviting residents to apply for the new Village Sustainability
Advisory Board before the application closes at the end of this week.
Village Trustee Eldahry – nothing to report.
Village Trustee Howell – the Arts Council was originally supposed to hold their “Express Yourself”
event on February 2nd, but due to a conflict with an activity at the school, they are now looking to
collaborate with Pelham Together for Winterfest. Stay tuned for more information. Trustee Howell
also shares that she is looking to enhance our social media accounts and provide more interactive
engagement. In terms of the Fire Department, they received 72 calls this month, a majority of them
being EMS. 7 were mutual aids between Pelham Manor and Mount Vernon, and 8 were accidents on
the Hutchinson River Parkway. The most recent being an accident involving an elderly driver with
spray cans in their car, causing a large fire. Trustee Howell also reiterates that the MyVOP app is an
important tool and it is there to report any hazards that you see (such as icy conditions), and shared
that she is trying to get a list of volunteers that would help those that are unable to shovel when
snowstorms do occur. Finally, Trustee Howell expressed how great the NYCOM event that she,
Trustee Anderson, Trustee Solomon, and Mayor Mullen attended was!
Village Trustee Otondi – nothing to report.
Village Trustee Solomon – Trustee Solomon begins by emphasizing how important person to person
conversations are, regardless of the topics being discussed. He then discusses Pedestrian Safety, and

[PAGE 3]
Village Board of Trustees Regular Meeting Tuesday, February 10, 2026
shares that he had a conversation with Senator Fernandez and Legislator Clements regarding
initiatives he has been working on, so stay tuned for some good news that will be reported at the
next meeting. Finally, if anyone ever wants to discuss anything regarding Village News, Trustee
Solomon shares that residents are more than welcome to reach out to him.
Deputy Mayor Carpenter – Deputy Mayor Carpenter reported that last summer the Village switched to
a new, unified parking enforcement and permit system. While the rollout had some initial issues,
Supervisor Mohan helped move the process forward. A new agreement between the Village, the
Town, and T2 is on the agenda to address remaining administrative issues and reach a resolution
soon.
Item # 5 - Village Administrator’s Report:
Administrator Scelza reported that since the last meeting, the Village successfully sold a bond
anticipation note to renew existing short-term debt and fund capital projects. The sale drew four
bids, reflecting strong market interest, and resulted in a low net interest cost of 2.456%, with an
extremely competitive spread of just 0.027% between the top bids.
Item # 6 - Mayor’s Report
Mayor Mullen reported that, as First Vice President of the Westchester Municipal Officials Association,
the organization has released its legislative agenda and recently met with state legislators in Albany.
He highlighted three key housing-related priorities: supporting state-led reform of State
Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) to streamline burdensome review processes; advocating
for expansion and increased funding of the Pro-Housing Communities Program, which rewards
municipalities that build housing and provides access to state grant funding (noting Pelham is
certified); and opposing proposed state legislation that would allow housing development “as of
right” on church properties, citing concerns about undermining local zoning control and unintended
consequences.
Mayor Mullen also reported attending the New York Conference of Mayors in Albany (February 1–3),
where he participated in a panel discussion on affordability. The panel emphasized that rising costs in
New York are driven by underinvestment in housing, infrastructure, and energy, and that addressing
affordability will require significant investment in those areas.
Mayor Mullen presented an overview of the RFQ process and next steps for potential redevelopment
of the Wolf’s Lane strip, identified as a priority since the 2008 Comprehensive Plan due to
underutilized properties generating less than $80,000 in taxes, pedestrian safety concerns from
multiple curb cuts, lack of rear access, parking constraints, and ongoing challenges facing The Picture
House. He clarified that the recently released blight study is a planning tool to guide potential public
investment and does not automatically trigger government action.
He explained that redevelopment is complicated by former gas station contamination, outdated
zoning requiring on-site parking and multiple curb cuts, fragmented ownership, and the risk that
individual, lot-by-lot projects could worsen the “broken teeth” streetscape, limit future rear access,
and preclude public benefits such as parking or open space. As a result, the Village pursued a multi-
site master planning approach and issued an RFQ in May to evaluate developer qualifications,

[PAGE 4]
Village Board of Trustees Regular Meeting Tuesday, February 10, 2026
experience, financial capacity, and conceptual ideas, including housing, public parking, community
space, placemaking, and coordination with the Picture House.
Following staff and attorney review, interviews, and outreach to property owners, PHP Partners (led
by Patrick Normoyle) received the highest ranking. The proposed Memorandum of Understanding is
non-binding, functions as a letter of intent, designates the developer if a project proceeds, and
provides for reimbursement of Village expenses if a development agreement is finalized.
Next steps include stakeholder engagement, meetings with property owners, the Town and School
District, public visioning sessions, and independent outreach by the Picture House. Mayor Mullen
emphasized the importance of proactive planning before any development decisions are made.
Item # 7 - Public Comments
James Smithmeyer, 163 Wolfs Lane: James Smithmeyer urged the Board to table the proposed MOU
resolution, citing several concerns. He argued the item was posted with insufficient notice and
without the referenced exhibit, making the vote procedurally defective. He contended the MOU
improperly grants a six-month exclusivity period not contemplated in the original RFQ, calling it a
material change to the bid terms.
Mr. Smithmeyer stated he has submitted an as-of-right development application for his property and
asserted that granting exclusivity to a third party would interfere with his property rights. He also
expressed concern that the Board had not responded to prior correspondence regarding his
ownership and development intentions. Finally, he claimed the proposed project would require
demolition of The Picture House, which he said conflicts with prior SEQRA findings regarding
protection of historic resources. He requested the resolution be tabled and that the Board address
these issues before proceeding.
Nathan Pereira, 804 Colonial Ave: Nathan Pereira raised a series of concerns regarding the proposed
MOU and related process. He requested greater transparency on bond amounts discussed at a prior
information session and questioned references in the MOU to a partnership or preliminary agreement
with The Picture House, noting that it is a not-for-profit governed by a board rather than traditional
owners. He asked how any such agreement would be structured and whether the public would have
an opportunity to review it.
Nathan cited ambiguity in several terms used in the MOU, including references to “blightening
influences,” “environmentally sensitive redevelopment,” the Village’s “vision” for mixed-use
redevelopment, and the “Wolfs Lane corridor.” He questioned whether these concepts reflect broader
community input or solely the Board’s position, and raised concerns about proposed elements such as
streetscape improvements and modernization of the Picture House.
He further questioned provisions stating that final project approval would be subject to future land
use and zoning approvals, and raised concerns about risk allocation. He asserted that the $50,000
escrow amount was insufficient and characterized the MOU as largely obligating the Village while

[PAGE 5]
Village Board of Trustees Regular Meeting Tuesday, February 10, 2026
imposing limited responsibilities on the developer. He suggested more favorable terms could have
been negotiated.
Nathan also noted that the blight study referenced in the resolution was not initially attached to the
agenda packet and questioned whether it was prepared to justify the proposed action. Trustee
Howell clarified during the meeting that the blight study had been posted on the Village website
under “related documents.”
Additionally, Nathan referenced a recorded preservation agreement restricting demolition of the
Picture House until 2038 and questioned why the process is advancing if such restrictions remain in
place. Mayor Mullen responded that Nathan was assuming the Picture House would be demolished,
and Trustee Howell clarifies that it was choosing a partner and NOT a bid.
Denise Boyle-Quatroni, 124 Pelhamdale Ave: Denise expressed concern about the Village’s
involvement in potential redevelopment of the Wolfs Lane area. She questioned the motivation for
pursuing the project, asked why existing business owners could not continue operating or sell
independently, and voiced concern about possible broader impacts, including effects on nearby
properties such as those near Manning Circle.
On behalf of another resident, she asked where the blight study could be accessed and questioned
why it was not included in the agenda packet. She also inquired about an alleged relationship
between the preferred developer and a member of the board of The Picture House.
Mayor Mullen responded that the proposed agreement is with the selected developer, not the Picture
House. Trustees Solomon and Howell clarified that the blight study had been posted on the Village
website since the prior Friday and demonstrated how to access it. Deputy Mayor Carpenter reviewed
the timeline, noting the RFQ was issued in May 2025, Mr. Smithmeyer was a respondent, the
referenced property was purchased in December 2025, and the Board is now considering next steps.
Nick Staropoli, 151 Wolfs Lane: Nick Staropoli, a long-time Wolfs Lane business owner whose family
has operated there since the 1960s, expressed frustration that the Board did not approach him
directly earlier in the process to discuss potential redevelopment. He stated that he was contacted
only after concerns had arisen and said he expected greater courtesy and direct communication given
his family’s longstanding presence and intention to continue operating for many years. Mayor Mullen
responded that he had spoken with Nick’s sister and had reached out to her regarding the matter.
Paul Bencivengo, 149 Wolfs Lane: Paul Bencivengo stated that he never received the letter the
Village claimed to have sent regarding the redevelopment and emphasized that he and other
longtime Wolfs Lane business owners were not consulted. He noted that he only learned about the
project through a developer in Manhattan and expressed frustration over the lack of direct
communication and courtesy.

[PAGE 6]
Village Board of Trustees Regular Meeting Tuesday, February 10, 2026
Catherine Landy, 26 Manning Circle: Catherine Landy expressed concern about the potential scale of
redevelopment on the gas station sites, stating that a five-story building could rise significantly above
nearby residential properties. She questioned how additional traffic and ingress/egress would be
managed in an area she described as already experiencing congestion and parking challenges.
Catherine also asked about the park located across the street from the sites and who owns it. Mayor
Mullen clarified that the Village owns the park and that no development is proposed there. He
explained that the purpose of the current process is to plan proactively and thoughtfully for potential
future development, rather than allow piecemeal projects without coordination.
Catherine further expressed concern about the timing and notice of the meeting, stating she felt
directly affected but had limited time to review materials. She noted seeing maps during the
presentation that she had not previously viewed and said she believed many residents may be
unaware that such redevelopment is under consideration.
Deputy Mayor Carpenter clarified that the item before the Board is not approval of a development
project and would not authorize any immediate changes to the Wolfs Lane area. He stated that the
proposed Memorandum of Understanding would simply allow the Village to enter into negotiations
with the highest-ranked RFQ respondent regarding potential future redevelopment. Mayor Mullen
added that while conceptual ideas have been discussed, the MOU represents only a next step to
begin longer-term planning discussions and does not constitute approval of a specific project.
Trustee Howell emphasized that the proposed MOU is not a purchase or development agreement and
does not approve any specific plan. She explained that the RFQ process evaluated respondents based
on qualifications such as financial capacity, relevant experience, and professional expertise, similar to
vetting contractors for a major project. She stated that no development plan has been finalized and
that the purpose of the MOU is only to identify a potential partner should the Village choose to
proceed. She also acknowledged construction and quality-of-life concerns and stressed that there is
no binding commitment to build.
Mayor Mullen added that, if the process advances, the developer would present concepts publicly,
potentially exploring phased options across multiple sites and addressing access and coordination
among property owners, to solicit community input before any decisions are made. Trustee Eldahry
noted that it is not uncommon for a memorandum of understanding to ultimately result in no project.
Rachel Adams, 28 Manning Circle: Rachel Adams expressed concern that the Board is considering a
plan for properties the Village does not own and questioned how residents can trust the process,
particularly given the proximity of the sites to neighboring homes. She argued that, unlike renovating
one’s own home, the Village is discussing privately owned property.
Deputy Mayor Carpenter responded that the effort is a conceptual planning exercise consistent with
the Village’s 2008 Comprehensive Plan, focused specifically on the Wolfs Lane corridor. He
emphasized that the MOU does not approve a site plan or architectural design but is intended to
guide coordinated long-term planning rather than allow piecemeal development over time.

[PAGE 7]
Village Board of Trustees Regular Meeting Tuesday, February 10, 2026
Mayor Mullen added that land use planning and zoning are core functions of the Board, noting prior
actions such as adoption of the BDFZ to shape downtown development. He stated that pursuing a
structured planning process would be a responsible way to guide future growth for the long-term
benefit of the community.
Rookaya Bawa, 305 Sixth Ave: Rookaya Bawa stated that she has repeatedly raised concerns about
parking displacement affecting her apartment building, noting that residents have lost use of two lots
they relied on for more than 20 years. She said the loss of parking has negatively impacted property
values and the ability to sell units, and that residents have been told a solution is forthcoming but
have not received clarity. Rookaya urged the Board to resolve existing parking issues and “make
good” on prior commitments before pursuing new redevelopment initiatives.

[PAGE 8]
Village Board of Trustees Regular Meeting Tuesday, February 10, 2026
Non-Recurring Items
Item # 8 – Resolution Authorizing Street Closure for Pelham Little League Parade
Whereas, the Pelham Little League has requested permission to host the Pelham Little League
Parade on Saturday, April 11, 2026 (copy attached); and
Whereas, the Pelham Little League shall reimburse the Village for all costs incurred by the Village as
a result of the event, including but not limited to Police Department and Department of Public Works
overtime, and provide a certificate of liability insurance naming the Village as an additional insured in
a form and amount satisfactory to the Village.
Now, therefore, be it resolved, that the Board of Trustees of the Village of Pelham herein
authorizes the closing of Fifth Avenue between Lincoln Avenue and Colonial, and Third Street from
Fourth Avenue to Seventh Avenue on Saturday, April 11, 2026, from 8:30 a.m. to 10:30 a.m. for the
2026 Pelham Little League Parade; and
Be it further resolved, that the Board of Trustees of the Village of Pelham authorize the
appropriate Village officials and staff to take the necessary and appropriate actions to allow this event
to take place.
Vote Record - Item # 8 – Resolution Authorizing Street Closure for Pelham Little League
Parade – 9:35 PM
Village of Pelham Board of Trustees Regular Meeting Tuesday, February 10, 2026
Yes/Aye No/Nay Abstain Absent
Approved Mayor Mullen
☒ ☒ ☐ ☐ ☐
☐
Approved as Deputy Mayor Carpenter
☒ ☐ ☐ ☐
Amended Village Trustee Anderson Motion
☒ ☐ ☐ ☐
☐ Tabled Village Trustee Eldahry Second ☒ ☐ ☐ ☐
☐ Withdrawn Village Trustee Howell
☒ ☐ ☐ ☐
Discussed
☐ Village Trustee Otondi
☒ ☐ ☐ ☐
Village Trustee Solomon
☒ ☐ ☐ ☐

[PAGE 9]
Village Board of Trustees Regular Meeting Tuesday, February 10, 2026
Item # 9 – Discussion on Celebrating America250 with NYCOM
Trustee Anderson proposed planting a native Liberty Tree in Pelham as part of a coordinated effort
with the Town of Pelham, the school district, and community groups to honor the country’s 250th
anniversary, promote civic engagement, and support climate resilience and environmental
stewardship. She noted the project would be low-cost, could leverage shared resources, and aligns
with the Town’s ongoing grant-funded tree inventory. The Board approved the proposal with no
objections.

[PAGE 10]
Village Board of Trustees Regular Meeting Tuesday, February 10, 2026
Item # 10 – Resolution Authorizing the Execution of a Memorandum of Understanding
and Escrow Agreement between the Village of Pelham and Potential Redeveloper – PHP
Partners, LLC.
Be it resolved, that the Board of Trustees of the Village of Pelham hereby authorizes the Mayor to
execute to the attached Memorandum of Understanding and Escrow Agreement between the Village
of Pelham and Potential Redeveloper – PHP Partners, LLC.
Vote Record - Item # 10 – Resolution Authorizing the Execution of a Memorandum of
Understanding and Escrow Agreement between the Village of Pelham and Potential
Redeveloper – PHP Partners, LLC. – 9:53 PM
Village of Pelham Board of Trustees Regular Meeting Tuesday, February 10, 2026
Yes/Aye No/Nay Abstain Absent
Approved Mayor Mullen
☒ ☒ ☐ ☐ ☐
☐
Approved as Deputy Mayor Carpenter Motion
☒ ☐ ☐ ☐
Amended Village Trustee Anderson Second
☒ ☐ ☐ ☐
☐ Tabled Village Trustee Eldahry ☐ ☒ ☐ ☐
☐ Withdrawn Village Trustee Howell
☒ ☐ ☐ ☐
☐ Discussed Village Trustee Otondi
☒ ☐ ☐ ☐
Village Trustee Solomon
☐ ☒ ☐ ☐
Deputy Mayor Carpenter stated that the proposed MOU represents a natural and deliberate stage in
the RFQ process, with proper diligence undertaken. He emphasized that a comprehensive plan for
the area is important to avoid piecemeal development but acknowledged that individual projects may
still occur. He expressed support for moving forward with the MOU to continue discussions and signal
the Village’s commitment, particularly in advance of the Picture House meeting next week, and
indicated his vote in favor. Mayor Mullen also clarifies that the MOU does not impact anyone’s
property rights.
Trustee Otondi stated that discussing and opening the MOU is a healthy step, allowing residents,
especially those directly affected, to review the documents, get up to speed, and have their voices
heard. He emphasized that this dialogue benefits the community and supports transparency.
Trustee Eldahry expressed discomfort in proceeding due to the fact that residents had trouble
locating the blight study.
Trustee Solomon acknowledged that the Village could have done a better job communicating with
property owners and sharing information, but expressed appreciation for the in-person discussion. He
stated that the MOU provides residents, especially those in Manning Circle, a voice in the process,
allowing them to engage with the developer and influence outcomes. He emphasized that the MOU is
an investment in Pelham’s long-term stability and future opportunities, encouraging continued
dialogue regardless of whether a project ultimately proceeds.
Trustee Anderson agreed with Trustee Solomon, emphasizing that the MOU is not a development
agreement and does not obligate the Village to any action. She noted that it allows the Village to
consider the Wolfs Lane corridor comprehensively, encourages forward-looking planning, and
facilitates public engagement and discussion about potential future development.

[PAGE 11]
Village Board of Trustees Regular Meeting Tuesday, February 10, 2026
Trustee Howell thanked residents for attending and emphasized the importance of public
engagement and community input. She clarified that the MOU is not a development plan and may
ultimately go nowhere, but it provides an opportunity for residents to share feedback. She also
highlighted that the Board’s approach is strategic, personal, and grounded in serving the community’s
interests.

[PAGE 12]
Village Board of Trustees Regular Meeting Tuesday, February 10, 2026
Item # 11 - Discussion on Calendar for Fiscal Year 2026-27 Budget Process
Administrator Scelza provided an overview of the Fiscal Year 2026–27 budget process, including
distribution of worksheets to department heads, submission of budget proposals by January 31, and
preparation of the tentative budget by the statutory deadline of March 20. He noted that the budget
adoption process follows New York State Village Law, targeting completion by May 1, and suggested
beginning discussions early.

[PAGE 13]
Village Board of Trustees Regular Meeting Tuesday, February 10, 2026
Item # 12 – Other Business
Resolution Authorizing the Execution of an Agreement Concerning the Parking
Enforcement Platform (Judicial Ethics Opinion and Access Control)
Be it resolved, that the Board of Trustees of the Village of Pelham hereby approves the agreement
by and between the Village of Pelham, T2 Systems, Inc., and the Town of Pelham concerning the
parking enforcement software platform, substantially in the form presented to the Board of Trustees
and attached hereto; and
Be it further resolved, that the Village Administrator is hereby authorized and directed to execute
said agreement on behalf of the Village of Pelham, together with any non-substantive or ministerial
changes as approved by the Village Attorney.
Vote Record - Item # 12 – Resolution Authorizing the Execution of an Agreement Concerning
the Parking Enforcement Platform (Judicial Ethics Opinion and Access Control) – 9:57 PM
Village of Pelham Board of Trustees Regular Meeting Tuesday, February 10, 2026
Yes/Aye No/Nay Abstain Absent
Approved Mayor Mullen
☒ ☒ ☐ ☐ ☐
☐
Approved as Deputy Mayor Carpenter
☒ ☐ ☐ ☐
Amended Village Trustee Anderson
☒ ☐ ☐ ☐
☐ Tabled Village Trustee Eldahry Motion ☒ ☐ ☐ ☐
☐ Withdrawn Village Trustee Howell Second
☒ ☐ ☐ ☐
Discussed
☐ Village Trustee Otondi
☒ ☐ ☐ ☐
Village Trustee Solomon
☒ ☐ ☐ ☐
Town of Pelham Sustainability Advisory Board – Village Representation: Trustee Anderson informed
the Board that the Town of Pelham is establishing its own Sustainability Advisory Board, including
representatives from the village boards, school district, and community members, to coordinate
information sharing, public education, and grant opportunities. She requested to serve as the Village
of Pelham’s representative, and the Board approved.

[PAGE 14]
Village Board of Trustees Regular Meeting Tuesday, February 10, 2026
Recurring Items
Item # 13 - Authorizing Accounts Payable
Village Trustee Eldahry is auditing the Accounts Payable.
Whereas, pursuant to § 5-524 of the New York State Village Law, the Board of Trustees shall audit
all claims against the Village.
Now, therefore, be it resolved, that the Board of Trustees of the Village of Pelham after audit of
the following vouchers, authorizes payment for services rendered and materials received, for the
following items that have been submitted to the Treasurer's Office for payment and authorized by the
Village Administrator/Treasurer and Deputy Village Treasurer:
Fund Name: Amount
General Fund (A) $ 123,790.04
Capital Projects Fund (H) $ 80,185.11
Trust & Agency (T) $ 0.00
Private Purpose Trust Fund (TE) $ 0.00
Grand Total $203,975.15
Be it further resolved, that the Village Board of Trustees hereby approves payment of the above-
mentioned claims and authorizes payment thereof.
Vote Record - Item # 13 – Resolution Authorizing Accounts Payable – 10:00 PM
Village of Pelham Board of Trustees Regular Meeting Tuesday, February 10, 2026
Yes/Aye No/Nay Abstain Absent
Approved Mayor Mullen
☐ ☒ ☐ ☐ ☐
☒
Approved as Deputy Mayor Carpenter Motion
☒ ☐ ☐ ☐
Amended Village Trustee Anderson Second
☒ ☐ ☐ ☐
☐ Tabled Village Trustee Eldahry ☒ ☐ ☐ ☐
☐ Withdrawn Village Trustee Howell
☒ ☐ ☐ ☐
☐ Discussed Village Trustee Otondi
☒ ☐ ☐ ☐
Village Trustee Solomon
☒ ☐ ☐ ☐

[PAGE 15]
Village Board of Trustees Regular Meeting Tuesday, February 10, 2026
Item # 14 - Authorizing Minutes of: January 27, Work Session and Regular Meeting
Vote Record - Item # 14 – Resolution Authorizing the Minutes of: January 27, Work Session
and Regular Meeting – 10:00 PM
Village of Pelham Board of Trustees Regular Meeting Tuesday, February 10, 2026
Yes/Aye No/Nay Abstain Absent
Approved Mayor Mullen
☒ ☒ ☐ ☐ ☐
☐
Approved as Deputy Mayor Carpenter Motion
☒ ☐ ☐ ☐
Amended Village Trustee Anderson Second
☒ ☐ ☐ ☐
☐ Tabled Village Trustee Eldahry ☒ ☐ ☐ ☐
☐ Withdrawn Village Trustee Howell
☒ ☐ ☐ ☐
Discussed
☐ Village Trustee Otondi
☒ ☐ ☐ ☐
Village Trustee Solomon
☒ ☐ ☐ ☐
Item # 15 – Adjournment
A motion was made by Village Trustee Eldahry, seconded by Village Trustee Anderson, voted
unanimously at 10:01 PM to adjourn for the evening.
Respectfully submitted,
Adriana Rugova, Village Clerk