[PAGE 1]
THE WHITE PINE COUNTY ADVISORY BOARD TO MANAGE
WILDLIFE MET IN SPECIAL SESSION ON
JANUARY 14, 2026 AT 6:00 PM AT THE WHITE PINE COUNTY
LIBRARY
Present:
Mitchell McVicars (Chairman)
Steve Marquez (Co. Chairman)
Jake Rosevear
Ray Sawyer
Thomas Brunson
Kayla Couch (Board Secretary)
Absent:
Visitors:
Kody Menghini (NDOW)
Ridge Ricketts (NDOW)
Pat Robison (WPC Commission)
Kathy Workman (WPC Finance)
Courtney Thornal (WPC Finance)
Cody Knight-Via phone
Called to order:
Board Chairman McVicars called the meeting to order at 6:07pm
Pledge of Allegiance
Public Comment Period: Board Member Jake Rosevear stated that Cody Knight requested to call in during the public
comment period. Board Member Rosevear contacted Knight by phone. Knight stated that the Nevada Sporting Dog
Association (NSDA) is requesting the White Pine County Wildlife Advisory Board’s support in recommending increased
law enforcement presence in the northern and eastern portions of Nevada once the first fresh snow has fallen. This would
help ensure that out-of-state residents are hunting mountain lions legally, promote fairness for local residents, and reduce
overcrowding within units and regions. Knight thanked the Board for their time.
Chairman Mitch McVicars stated that he had forwarded the email submitted by Cody Knight to Board Secretary Kayla
Couch. Board Member Steve Marquez stated that he has long supported local lion hunters; however, the state as a whole
does not present a united front on this issue. Board Member Rosevear noted that it was poor timing to make suggestions
regarding lion hunting and houndsmen permits, as mule deer populations have recently shown an increase. Rosevear also
stated that many guided lion hunts take place on U.S. Forest Service land.
Board Member Ray Sawyer asked what the additional law enforcement presence would address. Rosevear responded that
it would help track “who is hunting and from where” in this region of the state. Knight added that hunters are frequently
experiencing Utah and Idaho residents crossing state borders during mountain lion season.

[PAGE 2]
Chairman McVicars stated that inquiries had been made regarding Zoom attendance options for public members to
participate in CAB meetings when travel is not feasible. McVicars suggested that the Board may reach out to the County
IT Department to explore setting this up.
*Nomination of Chairman and Co. Chairman of the Board: Board Member Jake Rosevear nominated Mitch McVicars
and Steve Marquez to continue serving in their respective roles as Chair and Co. Chair of the Board. Board Members Jake
Rosevear and Thomas Brunson stated that they could not commit to these positions due to fall and hunting seasons
impacting their availability and attendance. McVicars and Marquez accepted the nominations
A motion to approve Mitch Mcvicars as Chairman and Steve Marquez as Co. Chairman of the White Pine County Wildlife
Advisory Board, was made by Board member Rosevear. The motion was seconded by Board member Sawyer and the
motion carried with no opposition.
*Approval of Agenda: Chairman McVicars called for approval of the agenda for the January 14, 2026, meeting with the
suggestion to move item H. (Pre Budget Planning FY2027-County) higher on the agenda.
A motion to approve the agenda for the January 14, 2026, meeting and move agenda item H. Pre Budget Planning for FY
2027-County from the White Pine County Wildlife Advisory Board agenda after agenda item F., was made by Board
member Sawyer. The motion was seconded by Board member Sawyer and the motion carried with no opposition.
*Approval of minutes:
The Board reviewed the November 3, 2025, special meeting minutes for approval.
Board Chairman entertained a motion.
A motion to approve the minutes for the November 3, 2025, special meeting, was made by Board member Brunson. Board
member Sawyer seconded the motion. The motion carried with no opposition.
*Pre Budget Planning for FY 2027 (County):
Board Discussion: Courtney Thornal (White Pine County Finance) distributed a county fund balance sheet, reporting the
CAB’s beginning balance of $5,292.88, total revenues of $2,456.00, total expenses of $600.00, and an ending balance of
$7,148.88.
Kathy Workman (White Pine County Finance Director) stated that while working on county budgets, it came to her
attention that the Finance Department had not been adequately communicating with the Wildlife CAB. Workman
explained that although the CAB budgets state-funded money at the state level, those funds must also be budgeted through
the county in order to be spent. When the state sends revenue differences, the CAB cannot use those funds unless they are
properly budgeted through the county. Workman emphasized the importance of the CAB budgeting a sufficient amount to
maintain an adequate balance.
Workman also advised against the Board investing in Zoom services, noting that the county is currently developing a
Commission Chambers space that will provide full access to Zoom and Microsoft Teams, as well as printers, computers,
and other resources for boards and secretaries. Workman commented that she dislikes the title “secretary” and apologized
for using it. Board Secretary Kayla Couch stated that she was not offended by the title.
Couch expressed concerns regarding budgeting a significant amount through the state, explaining that she receives a
budget worksheet in April or May that calculates travel based on GSA rates, does not allow requests for overages, and
budgets secretary services at $200.00 per meeting. Couch stated that her confusion lies in what the county reports to the
state as the ending balance versus what is actually available for the Board to spend. Couch noted that the current ending
balance appears to be approximately $7,100.00 and asked whether the Board should request that amount for the next fiscal
year.
Workman responded that the Board currently has approximately $6,300.00 available to spend through July 2026, noting
that only $600.00 has been expensed during the current fiscal year. Workman stated that in prior years, the CAB had only
budgeted $1,000.00 for travel, not realizing that travel occurs six times per year. Couch asked who had budgeted that

[PAGE 3]
amount. Workman stated that she had budgeted the funds and acknowledged that she had not been invited to meetings to
discuss prior budgeting practices.
Couch explained that historically, the CAB account was set up as a special revenue account, where the county would
report the year-end balance to the state and the state would send a revenue difference based on the CAB’s total budget
request. Couch stated that the county would then budget or roll over close to the ending balance, typically within
$1,000.00, to cover potential shortfalls. Workman stated that she understands the state plays a critical role in how CAB
funding works, but explained that if the CAB requests $5,000.00 from the state, the county would not know unless the
Board communicates that amount.
Chairman Mitch McVicars asked where budgeted revenue funds go if they are not available to the Board. Workman
explained that those funds remain in the ending fund balance and cannot be accessed unless they are budgeted for.
Chairman McVicars stated that he has served on the Board for many years and has never encountered this issue.
Workman stated that she has been with the county for three years and that, historically, the amounts she budgeted were
sufficient, except for last year due to her being unaware of four quarters of travel. Workman added that she has since
spoken with the state, and both the state and county agree that if the CAB does not provide an amount it intends to spend,
those funds cannot be released.
Couch asked whether the Board could request the full ending balance or a portion of it, such as $4,000.00. Workman
confirmed that the Board could do so and stated that this is a straightforward process. However, she explained that once
the budgeted amount is fully expended, no additional funds would be available unless the Board goes through an
augmentation process. Couch asked whether the funds could still be retrieved if needed. Workman confirmed that this is
possible, but the augmentation process could take one to two months to complete.
Chairman McVicars stated that based on conversations with other county CABs and the Deputy Director of NDOW,
White Pine County appears to be the only county experiencing this issue, and he expressed a desire to return to a simpler
process. Workman stated that moving forward, she will budget amounts closer to the year-end balance but emphasized
that once the Board reaches its budgeted limit, no additional funds will be available until an augmentation is approved.
Couch stated that she does not have concerns regarding spending oversight, as she monitors the county town reports and
maintains a detailed cost-tracking spreadsheet. Couch also noted that the Board often utilizes Zoom attendance instead of
traveling to commission meetings, which helps conserve funds.
Chairman McVicars asked whether Workman still preferred travel vouchers to be submitted prior to travel. Workman
stated that pre-submission is helpful for verifying fund availability but added that she is willing to work with the Board if
advance submission is inconvenient.
Chairman McVicars noted that the short timeframe between travel decisions and travel dates has been challenging.
Workman stated that after discussions with the state, she now has a better understanding of CAB operations and
acknowledged that previous budget figures may have been influenced by COVID-era travel reductions, which may have
caused errors in budgeting on her part. Workman stated that Board members are welcome to contact either county finance
administrator with any questions.
Workman reiterated her commitment to improving budgeting practices in the interest of both the CAB and the county.
Chairman McVicars thanked the White Pine County Finance Department for attending and providing clarification. Couch
also expressed appreciation, stating that the discussion was beneficial in ensuring everyone is aligned.
Workman again encouraged the Board to utilize the new Commission Chambers once available, which will provide full
access to meeting resources. Couch asked whether after-hours access would be available, as CAB meetings typically
occur at 6:00 p.m. Thornal stated that board secretaries and administrators will be issued keys for access.
Chairman McVicars noted public interest in attending meetings via Zoom. Workman stated that IT is working on setting
this up, though public access may be limited due to the elevator currently being out of service. Couch asked whether there
were alternative options for handicap accessibility. Thornal and Workman confirmed that the elevator is the only
accessible route, but noted that affected individuals may attend via Zoom when available.

[PAGE 4]
Couch asked whether the Board should make a motion regarding budget requests. Workman stated that a motion is not
required to request funds through the county, now that she understands the CAB budgeting process. Workman asked if
there were any additional questions or requests.
Board Member Steve Marquez asked whether internet access would be available, noting that the library’s internet is
currently not functioning. Workman stated that the county experienced a similar issue recently and will look into it, but
confirmed that the new chambers will have Wi-Fi access.
Marquez also suggested that speakers state their name and role for the record when speaking. Workman apologized and
formally stated her name and title as Kathy Workman, White Pine County Finance Director. Chairman McVicars noted
that he believed attendees were aware, but Marquez reiterated that this is helpful for the record. Workman stated that her
name is typically listed on the agenda and again apologized.
Thornal invited Couch to visit the Old Courthouse for a tour of the facilities available for Board use.
Public Comment: None.
*Payment of Bills:
The Board was presented with an invoice from Kayla Couch in the amount of $200.00 for secretary services for the
January 2026 meeting. a travel expense voucher totaling $924.00 was submitted for any member attending the
Commission meeting on January 23rd and 24th, 2026 in Reno, Nevada.
A motion to approve the payment of bills to Kayla Couch in the amount of $200.00 and the travel expense voucher for
$924.00 was made by Board member Sawyer, seconded by board member Rosevear. The motion was carried with no
opposition.
*Correspondence:
Chairman Mitch McVicars stated that he had forwarded the email from Cody Knight regarding support for increased law
enforcement presence during mountain lion season. Board Member Jake Rosevear asked whether this topic should be
added to the agenda for the next meeting. Board Member Thomas Brunson questioned what authority the Board would
have on the matter. Board Member Steve Marquez stated that the Board could address the issue under emerging CAB
items and place it on a future agenda.
Rosevear stated that Knight called in for a reason and that if the Board is able to support the Nevada Sporting Dog
Association (NSDA), he would like to do so. Chairman McVicars stated that he would support bringing the topic forward
for discussion. Board Member Sawyer stated that it may not be worth the CAB’s time if the state is divided on the issue
and no common ground has been established, suggesting it may be better addressed once the matter is more organized.
Brunson noted that Knight’s email was addressed to the Commission. Rosevear stated that he currently holds a neutral
position on the topic.
Brunson commented that the issue of law enforcement is a recurring concern, stating that in 230 days spent in the field, he
has encountered only one game warden. Brunson stated that there is a greater need for wardens in rural Nevada than on
the waters of Lake Mead and expressed concern that Elko and White Pine Counties host a large number of sportsmen
during hunting seasons yet have only one to two wardens covering the area.
Kody Menghini (NDOW) stated that he understands the concern regarding limited law enforcement presence. Menghini
explained that officers often build their schedules weeks in advance and may not be available during certain times of the
year. He stated that while he understands why Knight and others would want increased enforcement following
snowstorms, scheduling flexibility does not always allow for it. Brunson added that patrol budgets can also be limited or
unavailable depending on location and time of year.
Board Member Sawyer stated that he received an email from the Captain of Wildlife Game Wardens regarding a
previously discussed agenda item that may be brought back in January. Sawyer and Brunson stated that the topic involved

[PAGE 5]
potential rule changes for guiding services. Sawyer expressed concern about ensuring master guides are held accountable
for what they are expected to know. He questioned whether a guide could be penalized twice if their license is revoked
after pre-booking clients for the season, potentially resulting in a breach of contract.
Brunson stated that he would like clarification on who would be responsible for determining punishment, whether it
would be the courts, law enforcement, or Captain Kreamer. Brunson stated that he took extensive notes during the last
Zoom meeting on the topic and plans to follow up with his own questions, adding that the situation could allow for
targeted enforcement against certain master guides.
Rosevear also raised concerns regarding the demerit point penalty system, noting that penalties can range from 0 to 12
points for a single offense. Sawyer asked where guides are required to carry their paperwork, stating that as a sub-guide he
keeps his documentation in his vehicle rather than on his person. Rosevear and Brunson confirmed that the paperwork
must be kept in the guide’s means of transportation. Brunson added that if a guide backpacks into camp for several days,
the paperwork is required to be carried on their person.
Rosevear asked why, with current technology, there is not an application that allows guides to access the “blue book”
digitally on a phone or electronic device.
Secretary Kayla Couch stated that she received an email from the newly assigned local game warden requesting to be
added to the agenda distribution list. Couch stated that she replied to the email and included the current meeting agenda.
Chairman McVicars asked for the warden’s name, and Couch responded that it was Nicholas Brancato.
*Reports:
Ridge Ricketts (NDOW) reported that the department will conduct another bighorn sheep capture on Wednesday, January
28, in the North Pancake Range of Unit 164. Board Member Thomas Brunson asked whether the department had captured
any sheep during the previous effort. Ricketts responded that during the last capture, which was attended by Chairman
McVicars and Commissioner Bornn, the department captured a total of 12 sheep, including five rams and seven ewes.
Ricketts stated that all CAB members are invited to attend the capture. Brunson asked whether the sheep were tested.
Ricketts reported that testing results were received overnight and that one of the 12 sheep had an inconclusive test result
and was humanely euthanized. The remaining 11 sheep were released into Unit 251. Brunson stated that he was pleased to
hear that few sheep tested positive for disease.
Board Member Steve Marquez asked whether there are sheep near Black Rock where domestic sheep had previously been
run. Ricketts confirmed that there are, and that the capture and release effort is part of that ongoing management process.
Marquez asked whether the spear-fishing regulation had passed. Kody Menghini (NDOW) reported that the regulation has
passed and that Heath Korell (NDOW) is working to update the e-regulation system accordingly.
Chairman McVicars reported that NDOW recently completed significant work on the diversion between Comins and the
valley bottom near Area 3C, and stated that the area looks good.
7A*. Division Activity Reports:
Board Discussion: None.
Public Comment: None.
7B*. Litigation Report:
Board Discussion: None.
Public Comment: None.
7C*. Tag Allocation and Application Hunt Committee (TAAHC) Report:
Board Discussion: None.
Public Comment: None.

[PAGE 6]
7D*. Administrative Procedures, Regulations and Policy (APRP) Committee Report:
Board Discussion: None.
Public Comment: None.
7E*. Elk Management Committee Report:
Board Discussion: Chairman McVicars stated that he would have liked for a White Pine County CAB member to have
been invited, noting that both Elko and Lincoln Counties had members in attendance and that he believed White Pine
County would have been selected as well. McVicars reported that the next meeting of this committee will be held on
January 22, 2026, at 2:00 p.m., and that a Zoom link will be available.
Menghini commented that there may be a limit on members for the committee and that is likely to rotate counties every
couple of years. Menghini stated that this is the first year with this new committee and is not sure of the selection process.
Public Comment: None.
7F*. Western Association of Fish an Wildlife Agencies (WAFWA) Executive Leadership:
Board Discussion: None.
Public Comment: None.
7G*. Emerging Technology Committee Report:
Board Discussion: Chairman McVicars reported that next meeting for this committee will be held on January 21, 2026 at
5:00 p.m.
Public Comment: None.
7H*. Wildlife Heritage Account Report:
Board Discussion: None.
Public Comment: None.
7I*. Department Project Donation Guidance Update:
Board Discussion: None.
Public Comment: None.
8*. Draft Fiscal year 2027 Predation Management Plan:
Board Discussion: Ridge Ricketts (NDOW) reported on predator management efforts associated with mule deer
enhancement projects. Under Project 47 in Unit 121, a total of 11 mountain lions were removed over an 11-month period.
Project 40, which was originally located in the Diamond Range, was moved to Area 13 and operated from July through
December, during which 13 mountain lions were removed. Ricketts also reported that 70 coyotes were removed from the
northern portion of Unit 131 through ground-based and trapping methods, rather than aerial removal.
Board Member Jake Rosevear asked whether predator removals in Unit 112 involved coyotes or mountain lions. Kody
Menghini (NDOW) responded that they were mountain lions and stated that although he did not have exact numbers,
approximately two to three lions have been removed from Unit 112 since the fall, and five lions from Unit 113 during the
same period.
Chairman Mitch McVicars asked whether any projects were underway in Area 22. NDOW responded that none of the
current projects include Area 22. Rosevear confirmed that Project 40 covers more than just Area 13. Ricketts clarified that
Project 40 primarily focuses on Area 13 and on coyote removal within the summer range and fawning grounds of Unit
131.
Board Member Thomas Brunson stated that several of his guides observed packs of coyotes taking down two deer and a
cow elk. Rosevear reported encountering a recently killed buck with no lion tracks present, indicating the kill was likely
by coyotes. Brunson commented that coyotes may be more of a nuisance than often recognized.

[PAGE 7]
Chairman McVicars asked whether NDOW had collared any fawns. Menghini reported that 25 fawns were collared in
Unit 111 in early December as part of a study to collect mortality data. Menghini stated that one fawn died due to capture-
related complications and that two others are likely confirmed mountain lion kills, noting that a female mountain lion with
three kittens has been observed in the area.
Chairman McVicars asked, of the mountain lions removed, how many were female versus male. Ricketts reported that in
Unit 121, six of the removed lions were female, and in Unit 131, four were female.
Rosevear asked how long Project 40 is expected to continue. Ricketts explained that the project duration is based on
meeting fawn-to-doe ratio guidelines, evaluated using a three-year average.
Chairman McVicars asked for additional information regarding collar data. Ricketts reported that in Area 12, where
collars were deployed in February 2024, there were three mortalities: one capture-related, one mountain lion kill, and one
undetermined. In 2025, there were four mortalities, three of which were mountain lion kills and one undetermined,
resulting in approximately 67% of mortalities being mountain lion-related. Ricketts noted that these mortalities involved
adult does in Unit 121.
Ricketts further reported that in Unit 13 during 2024, there were four mortalities: two mountain lion kills, one coyote kill,
and one undetermined. In 2025, there were five mortalities, consisting of three mountain lion kills, one coyote kill, and
one undetermined. Over the two-year period in Unit 131, approximately 55% of mortalities were mountain lion-related,
and 78% of total mortalities were attributed to predation.
Chairman McVicars asked whether the Department is able to track where the deer population is moving. Ridge Ricketts
(NDOW) responded that the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) has provided comments indicating that findings will likely
be published for Area 13, identifying it as the White Pine Grant Range deer herd, including associated migration
corridors. Ricketts added that similar follow-up is expected for Areas 22 and 12 within the next one to two years.
Board Member Jake Rosevear asked whether the Area 13 Mule Deer Management Group is still active. Ricketts
responded that the group has not been active. Rosevear explained that he asked because at the previous meeting there had
been discussion about opening migration corridors and he was curious whether any progress had been made. Ricketts
stated that a current summit has been identified and that approximately 315 acres of pinyon-juniper encroachment have
been treated through mastication and hand thinning near the NDOT substation.
Rosevear asked whether any projects had been approved near the Parish area. Ricketts responded that no projects have
been approved there, noting that wilderness designations significantly limit management actions in that area. Rosevear
commented that it is unfortunate that the Forest Service is unable to return to prescribed burning in those areas.
Ricketts also reported that 30 ear-tag transmitters have been deployed in antelope herds within Units 131 and 145.
Rosevear asked whether there had been any reported losses in those herds. Ricketts responded that three mortalities
occurred due to capture-related causes and that no additional losses have been documented.
Public Comment: None.
A motion to support agenda item 8. Draft Fiscal Year 2027 Predation Management Plan, was made by Board member
Sawyer, seconded by board member Marquez. The motion was carried with no opposition.
9A*. Commission General Regulation 529- Disability Permit Program Revisions:
Board Discussion: Board Member Rosevear reported that only change he noticed was the archery disability permit is
now 5 years instead of 1 year. Board Member Brunson stated that the visual impaired portion has improved.
Public Comment: None.
A motion to support agenda item 9A. Commission General Regulation 529-Disability Permit Program Revisions, was
made by Board member Brunson, seconded by board member Sawyer. The motion was carried with no opposition.
10*. Petition:
Board Discussion: None.
Public Comment: None.

[PAGE 8]
A motion to support agenda item 10. Petition was made by Board member Brunson, seconded by board member Sawyer.
The motion was carried with no opposition.
17A*. Commission Regulation 25-07 Amendment #2 2025-2026 and 2026-2027 Big Game Seasons:
Board Discussion: Ridge Ricketts (NDOW) reported that for the depopulation effort in Unit 164, the Department plans to
implement two seasons for Nelson desert bighorn sheep ram management hunts. These hunts would be non-accountable
against sportsmen’s points. The Department intends to utilize hunters to remove rams and prevent further reproduction in
that area. Ricketts suggested that the CAB recommend, under Hunt 3151, removing Unit 164 from Unit Group 131/132.
Kody Menghini (NDOW) reported that the Department is proposing two additional cow elk seasons for agricultural land
hunts in Units 114 and 115 due to poor winter conditions. Board Member Steve Marquez asked about hunter success in
those areas. Menghini stated that success typically depends on the year and season, noting that early seasons are generally
productive, while late-season hunts slow as elk move back to hay fields.
Board Member Thomas Brunson asked whether the Department is prepared to issue hunts in the Mount Moriah area.
Menghini responded that hunts will not be issued until there is a sufficient population of mature rams. Brunson stated that
he would like to better evaluate the area to determine whether it could support at least one tag.
Board Member Sawyer stated that changes are needed to the antlerless muzzleloader elk hunt. He noted that the current
season occurs during the peak of the rut and expressed concern that cows should be left undisturbed during that period to
reduce stress. Sawyer proposed changing the season dates to October 22 through October 29, acknowledging that this
would overlap with the bull hunt. Sawyer stated that tag numbers are low for both hunts and that encounters with bulls
accompanied by cows would be minimal. He questioned whether the suggested date change should apply only to White
Pine County units or statewide, noting that the current statewide dates run from September 17 through September 24.
Sawyer emphasized that elk populations should be disturbed as little as possible during the rut.
Brunson stated that his primary concern would be overlap with the bull hunt, but after reviewing quotas, he felt tag
numbers were not high enough to create significant conflict. Rosevear asked whether the cow muzzleloader season could
be moved to occur before the muzzleloader bull hunt. Chairman McVicars asked the Department for its input.
Menghini stated that he has not observed negative impacts on herd performance related to the current season structure,
though he understands concerns about stress. He noted that in the past, muzzleloader cow and bull hunts ran concurrently
in December. Menghini clarified that he was not suggesting moving the bull season, but potentially moving the cow
season to December.
Sawyer asked whether there is a rifle hunt in December. Menghini responded that the Board could suggest adjusting the
season structure, including splitting December between muzzleloader and rifle hunts. Ricketts added that the proposed
amendment would also add two additional days to the season.
Brunson stated that cow hunts are the primary tool for managing elk populations, and reiterated that his main concern is
overlap with the bull hunt, particularly given that hunters often wait 10 to 15 years to draw a bull tag. He stated that it
could be frustrating for those hunters to share the field with cow hunters.
Menghini stated that he did not disagree with the concerns raised and noted that he has been reviewing data and potential
adjustments to create breaks for both deer and elk. Menghini explained that this is an off year for season setting and that
the Department typically brings forward only major changes during these years. He added that next year the Department
would like to engage in more comprehensive discussions about creating meaningful seasonal breaks.
Board Members Sawyer and Marquez reviewed calendars and discussed options, noting that any changes would require
shifting other hunting seasons. Sawyer asked whether, in an off year, the Board is allowed to adjust other rifle seasons.
Menghini stated that he was not certain but believed it may be possible. Sawyer stated that he did not want to create
unnecessary complications.

[PAGE 9]
Rosevear asked whether any bulls were harvested during the Area 13 muzzleloader hunt. Ricketts reported that no bulls
were harvested. Brunson commented that the Area 13 muzzleloader bull hunt is particularly challenging.
Brunson suggested that it may be best to discuss moving the cow muzzleloader season dates during the off-season,
allowing the Board time to review all hunt dates and develop a strategic plan that provides breaks for cow elk and does
during mating seasons. Menghini agreed and suggested adding the topic to the county agenda following quota discussions
so the Commission can review it and allow time for thoughtful planning.
Secretary Kayla Couch suggested placing the item on the June or August agenda. Chairman McVicars stated that June
would be preferable, as August coincides with the start of hunting season and youth sports.
Sawyer also voiced opposition to the January 31 antlerless hunt, stating that it contradicts policies against harassing
wildlife during the off-season. Sawyer commented that if shed antler hunting is restricted in January due to concerns over
animal stress and harassment, then late-season antlerless harvests should also be reconsidered. Menghini responded that
particular hunt meets target specific quotas regarding private lands. Sawyer stated regardless is goes against the general
principal.
Public Comment: None.
A motion to support agenda item 17A. Commission Regulation 25-07 Big game Amendment #2 2025-2026 and 2026-2027
Big Game Seasons, with the recommend to remove unit 164 from unit groups 131 and 132 in hunt 3151 Nieson Big Horn
Sheep, Any Ram, Any Legal Weapon Hunt was made by Board member Brunson, seconded by board member Sawyer. The
motion was carried with no opposition.
17B*. Commission Regulation 26-01, 2027 Spring Turkey and 2026 Application Deadlines:
Board Discussion: None.
Public Comment: None.
A motion to support agenda item 17B. Commission Regulation 26-01, 2027 Spring Turkey and 2026 Application
Deadlines, was made by Board member Marquez, seconded by board member Sawyer. The motion was carried with no
opposition.
17C*. Commission Regulation 26-02 2026 Tag Application Eligibility and Tag Limits:
Board Discussion: None.
Public Comment: None.
A motion to support agenda item 17C. Commission Regulation 26-02 2026 Tag Application Eligibility and Tag Limits,
was made by Board member Brunson, seconded by board member Rosevear. The motion was carried with no opposition.
17D*. Commission Regulation 26-03 2026 Dream Tag Seasons and Quotas:
Board Discussion: None.
Public Comment: None.
A motion to support agenda item 17D. Commission Regulation 26-03 2026 Dream Tag Seasons and Quotas, was made by
Board member Brunson, seconded by board member Sawyer. The motion was carried with no opposition.
17E*. Commission Regulation 26-04, 2027 Heritage Tag Seasons and Quotas:
Board Discussion: None.
Public Comment: None.
A motion to support agenda 17E Commission Regulation 26-04, 2027 Heritage Tag Seasons and Quotas, was made by
Board member Rosevear, seconded by board member Brunson. The motion was carried with no opposition.
17F*. Commission Regulation 26-05, 2026 Partnership in Wildlife Tag Seasons and Quotas:
Board Discussion: None.

[PAGE 10]
Public Comment: None.
A motion to support agenda item 17E. Commission Regulation 26-05, 2026 Partnership in Wildlife Tag Seasons and
Quotas was made by Board member Rosevear, seconded by board member Brunson. The motion was carried with no
opposition.
17G*. Commission Regulation 26-06, 2026 Big Game Silver State and 2027 Wild Turkey Silver State Tag Seasons
and Quotas :
Board Discussion: None.
Public Comment: None.
A motion to support agenda item 17G. Commission Regulation 26-06, 2026 Big Game Silver State and 2027 Wild Turkey
Silver State Tag Seasons and Quotas, was made by Board member Brunson, seconded by board member Sawyer. The
motion was carried with no opposition.
17H*. Commission Regulation 26-07, 2026 Black Bear Seasons:
Board Discussion: None.
Public Comment: None.
A motion to support agenda 17H. Commission Regulation 26-07, Black Bear Seasons, was made by Board member
Rosevear, seconded by board member Sawyer. The motion was carried with no opposition.
17I*. Commission Regulation 26-08, 2026-2027 Mountain Lion Season and Harvest Limits:
Board Discussion: None.
Public Comment: None.
A motion to support agenda item 17I Commission Regulation 26-08, 2026-2027 Mountain Lion Seasons and Harvest
Limits, was made by Board member Brunson, seconded by board member Sawyer. The motion was carried with no
opposition.
17J*. Commission Regulation 26-09, 2026-2027 Restricted Non-Resident Guided Mule Deer Seasons and Quotas:
Board Discussion: None.
Public Comment: None.
A motion to support agenda item 17J. Commission Regulation 26-09, 2026-2027 Restricted Non-Resident Guided Mule
Deer Seasons and Quotas, was made by Board member Rosevear, seconded by board member Sawyer. The motion was
carried with no opposition.
Next Commission meeting Scheduled for January 23rd and 24th , 2026 the location of the meeting is subject to change
due to direction of the Governor during the COVID-19 pandemic. The Commission may change the time and meeting
location at this time. The Chairwoman may designate and adjust committee assignments and add or dissolve committees,
as necessary at this time. Any anticipated committee meetings that may occur prior to the next Commission meeting may
be discussed.
A motion to approve any White Pine County CAB member that is available to travel to the next State Commission meeting
that will be held on Friday January 23rd and Saturday January 24th, 2026. was made by Board member Sawyer and
seconded by Board memberRosevear. The motion carried with no opposition.
The board discussed having the next advisory meeting on Monday, March 9, 2026, at 6:00pm at the White Pine
County Library.

[PAGE 11]
A motion to approve the next CAB meeting date of March 9, 2026. was made by Board member McVicars and seconded
by Board member Sawyer. The motion carried with no opposition.
Public comment: The Board discussed adding the Houndmen discussion item back on the agenda, along with adding an
agenda item to discuss in depth the season setting at the June 2026 meeting to prepare for the 2027 season settings
meeting.
Adjournment: Chairman McVicars entertained a motion.
A motion to adjourn the White Pine County Wildlife Advisory meeting on January 14, 2026, was made by Board member
Sawyer, seconded by Board member Rosevear. The motion carried with no opposition.
The meeting was adjourned at 8:05pm.