[PAGE 1]
AGENDA
Thursday, September 18, 2025: 6:00 PM
Planning Board
Douglass Community Center: 1185 W. Pennsylvania Ave
1. CALL TO ORDER
2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
a. August 2025 Regular Meeting
3. PRELIMINARY FORUM
a. PD-03-25 Southern Pines Corporate Park Planned Development - Preliminary Development Plan
4. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
5. NEW BUSINESS
a. Appointment of Vice Chairperson
b. Discussion regarding Planning staff's review of applications for the Planning Board
6. ADJOURNMENT
Page 1 of 32

[PAGE 2]
MINUTES
Planning Board Regular Meeting
E.S. Douglass Community Center, 1185 W. Pennsylvania Avenue
Thursday, August 21, 2025, at 6:00 PM
Chair Walden called the meeting to order at 6:00 PM.
Chair Matthew Walden, Vice Chair Kim Wade, Jennifer Garner, Andrew Speck and Jason Scribner
were present.
Jason Scribner made a motion, which was seconded by Andrew Speck, to approve the Minutes
of the July 2025 regular meeting. The motion carried.
PUBLIC HEARINGS:
OA-03-25: Proposed UDO Text Amendments
The Town of Southern Pines Planning Department is proposing to amend UDO §2.18.3 related to
the process for amending existing Planned Development (PD) - Conceptual Development Plans
(CDP) to no longer require the signature of every landowner within the PD unless the proposed
amendment constitutes a down-zoning under North Carolina law. The proposed amendment will
require that all landowners be notified of a Neighborhood Meeting prior to submittal of the
proposed amendment.
The second proposed amendment is to UDO Exhibit 3-1 to reflect a 30’ Minimum Rear Setback
in the Rural Estate (RE) zoning district. Exhibit 3-1 mistakenly lists 15’ for the Minimum Rear
Setback.
The third amendment is to UDO §8.11 to clarify that a landowner and/or applicant is welcome to
attend meetings of the Technical Review Committee (TRC) because these meetings are open to
the public.
Chair Walden opened the public hearing.
Planning Director BJ Grieve explained the three proposed text amendments. He stated that
Planning staff did not have a recommendation regarding the amendment regarding the CDP
process as it is more of a policy change.
Joel Carner, 465 E. Delaware Avenue, expressed support for the CDP text amendment and to
opening TRC meetings to the public.
James Hindmarsh, 215 Carmine Road, expressed support for the text amendments.
Chair Walden closed the public hearing.
August 2025 Minutes Planning Board Regular Meeting Page 1 of 8
Page 2 of 32

[PAGE 3]
Jason Scribner made a motion, seconded by Jennifer Garner, that after reviewing the proposed
text amendments to the UDO and considering the criteria for approval of text amendments found
in UDO §2.17.10, the proposed amendments are consistent with the Comprehensive Plan for the
reasons set forth in Attachment A of staff report OA-03-25 and therefore, to recommend
approval of OA-03-25 to the Town Council. The motion carried by a vote of 5-0.
Z-05-25: Request to Rezone One Parcel on Clark Street from RM-2 (Residential Multi-Family) to
RM-1CD (Residential Multi-Family Conditional Zoning District)
Trevor Hanson of V3 Southeast P.C., authorized agent for Legacy Home Construction, Inc.,
submitted a request to rezone a +1.48-acre parcel from RM-2 to RM-1CD to allow for the
development of 16 townhome units. Pursuant to the Moore County tax record, the subject parcel
is identified as PIN 858219617079 (PARID 00032727) and owned by Legacy Home Construction,
Inc.
MAPP-04-25: Major Subdivision Preliminary Plat for 16 Single-Family Townhomes
Trevor Hanson of V3 Southeast P.C., authorized agent for Legacy Home Construction, Inc.,
submitted a Major Subdivision Preliminary Plat application to subdivide a +1.48 acres currently
zoned RM-2 into 16 townhome lots. Pursuant to the Moore County tax record, the subject parcel
is identified as PIN 858219617079 (PARID 00032727) and owned by Legacy Home Construction,
Inc.
Chair Walden opened the public hearing and the preliminary forum.
Planner James Broadwell stated that the density had doubled from the previous plan but many
more trees are being retained and the applicant has committed to architecture that is more
consistent with Southern Pines. Overall, the project is more consistent with the Comprehensive
Plan in that it calls for preserving a large number of trees and locating high-density development
in close proximity to downtown, especially on a redevelopment site. In addition, the townhomes
will be conveyed separately, which will provide missing middle housing.
The lots to the north and south will have slightly different setbacks due to the design of the units
and units 5 - 11 will have attached garages. The applicant has submitted two site plan options
for units 1-4 and 12-16 – one with surface parking only and the other with detached garages
instead of surface parking – and staff had no issues with either plan. There will be a 20’ landscape
buffer along the eastern property boundary. One of the proposed conditions is that surface
parking and detached garages may encroach up to 15’ into the buffer. Stormwater management
will be designed using a combination of rain gardens, depressions, bioswales, underground
cisterns and/or retention ponds. The property is located in a High-Quality Watershed but was
granted a Watershed Protection Permit with approval of the previous Major Subdivision
Preliminary Plat (file #MAPP-02-24).
August 2025 Minutes Planning Board Regular Meeting Page 2 of 8
Page 3 of 32

[PAGE 4]
There are existing trees throughout the site, especially along the perimeter and there is a
condition that any trees that do not interfere with the driveway, building footprints or utilities
shall be preserved.
Mr. Broadwell stated that the applicant had no issues with the proposed conditions and staff
recommended approval of the project.
Devin McFarland of V3, representing the applicant, stated that if they had stuck with the
previously approved site plan, they would have had to either increase the cost or reduce the
quality of the housing, so with this new updated site plan, they're able to provide more attainable
missing middle for the community, and reduce the environmental impact, preserving a lot more
trees with this new redesigned site.
Mr. McFarland provided the list of the proposed conditions set forth in the application.
Mr. Broadwell distributed letters received from neighboring property owners to the Board.
Johnny Sanderson, 125 Midlothian Drive, stated that the project was not consistent with the
neighborhood and expressed concerns regarding traffic safety and the condition of Clark Street
in that area.
Barry Stroud, 250 Artillery Road, stated that he does not think the project is consistent with the
surrounding RS-1 properties. He is definitely apposed due to significant stormwater runoff,
maintenance of the existing culverts, the change to the character of their quiet neighborhood,
and the connection from Clark to Midlothian will increase traffic and potentially speeding
vehicles. He is opposed to the deviations from the setbacks. Eliminate the road from Clark Street
to Midlothian Drive. He inquired about the purpose of the road from Clark Street to Midlothian
Drive.
Trevor Hansen of V3, responded that the cut through was for emergency access. The applicant
wants to provide a missing middle housing option. Current zoning allows townhomes.
We did explore another option to just lock the lot it out with single family homes, but then in
that sort of scenario, we would have had driveways that would have connected out to
Midlothian.
You know, the current zoning does allow for town homes, so we still think it's consistent with the
overall comprehensive plan, and we just think that this was a balance of saving trees on site and
providing missing middle housing options, which is what the comprehensive plan calls
Mr. Stroud commented that missing middle housing is intended to be affordable housing.
Town Attorney McCarley stated that price point is not a legitimate consideration for land use.
August 2025 Minutes Planning Board Regular Meeting Page 3 of 8
Page 4 of 32

[PAGE 5]
Luke Leineweber, 301 Midlothian Drive, stated that there was no advantage to having a cut
through from Clark Street to Midlothian Drive and a reduction in the setbacks will set a terrible
precedent.
Nettie Calfee, 207 Midlothian Drive, stated that it is going to be very unsafe due to the very steep
hill on Midlothian Drive and will be a blind spot for residents pulling out of the development.
Keith Brennan, 240 Midlothian Drive, expressed concerns regarding traffic safety and stormwater
issues.
Mark Kemple, 405 Midlothian Drive, stated that flooding and increased traffic were concerns.
Alison Kemple, 405 Midlothian Drive, stated that the confluence of water at the bottom of
Midlothian Drive and Artillery Road from a normal rain. [photo to be entered into the record]
Joel Carner, 465 E. Delaware Avenue, stated that middle housing is consistent with the Comp
Plan. He asked if the cut through road will be accessible to the public or will it be gated.
Trevor responded that it will most likely not be gated but it will be a private drive.
Mr. Carner asked if bicycles, pedestrians, etc. outside of the development will be available to
members of the public.
Trevor responded that the common space will be for the residents of the development.
Mr. Carner asked if buried utilities could be a condition.
Planning Director BJ Grieve responded that the developer will be required to bury the utility lines.
Chair Walden closed the public hearing and the preliminary forum.
Trevor Hansen stated the requested setback reductions were in an effort to retain existing
vegetation. There is a significant number of existing trees on the project site. There are not as
many trees on the northern end of the site so they are encroaching closer to that boundary, but
there is a significant amount of existing vegetation within the right of way of Midlothian Drive.
Many of the setback reductions they requested relate more to the setbacks that are interior to
the development.
Chair Walden reopened the public hearing.
Mr. Leineweber stated that the plan did not specify which trees will be retained.
August 2025 Minutes Planning Board Regular Meeting Page 4 of 8
Page 5 of 32

[PAGE 6]
Mr. Kemple asked if the fire access could be modified.
Mr. Broadwell responded that 150’ is a fire code requirement.
Mr. Sanderson stated that a 40’ setback is not consistent with the surrounding neighborhood.
Steve Dailey, 162 Boiling Springs Way, stated that if the new plan includes coming from Clark
Street to Midlothian Drive, he urged the Board to consider the fact that the original plan may
have been good and this plan was not.
Chair Walden closed the public hearing.
Board discussion ensued.
Chair Walden reopened the public hearing.
Jennifer Bray, 220 Artillery Road, stated that several new houses have been built on Clark Street
that have not sold. Three new townhomes at the end of Clark Street and Yadkin Road are still for
sale. Whether there are 8 or 16 townhomes that still does not address the issue of flooding that
is always occurring due to runoff from the new builds on Clark Street.
Chair Walden closed the public hearing.
Kim Wade made a motion, seconded by Jason Scribner, that after reviewing the proposed
Conditional Zoning District and after considering the criteria for approval of zoning map
amendments found in UDO §2.17.9 and/or the 2040 Comprehensive Plan, the requested zoning
is not a reasonable request for the following reasons:
a. safety;
b. traffic;
c. stormwater;
d. access to Midlothian Drive;
e. increased density; and
f. density is not in character and consistent with the neighborhood
and therefore, to recommend denial of Z-05-25 to the Town Council. The motion carried by a
vote of 5-0.
Mr. Broadwell stated that the proposed Major Subdivision Preliminary Plat was contingent upon
approval of the rezoning and therefore, the Preliminary Forum would not be held as the proposed
subdivision was not compliant with the current zoning.
August 2025 Minutes Planning Board Regular Meeting Page 5 of 8
Page 6 of 32

[PAGE 7]
MAPP-03-25: Major Subdivision Preliminary Plat for Seven (7) Single-Family Residential Lots
Colin Webster of The Ascot Corporation, authorized agent, submitted a Major Subdivision
Preliminary Plat application to subdivide 4.46 acres currently zoned RS-2 into seven (7) single-
family residential lots ranging in size from 22,774 to 29,447 square feet. Pursuant to the Moore
County tax record, the subject parcel is identified as PIN 858000651316 (PARID 00055181) and is
owned by The Waugh Group LLC and J. Edward Rhodes.
Chair Walden opened the preliminary forum.
Planner James Broadwell distributed a letter received from a concerned neighbor regarding
stormwater to the Board and provided an overview of the application. He stated that the plan
was to subdivide the parcel into seven (7) lots with the exception of the northern portion, which
will be recombined with a neighboring parcel. Town water is available to the site and individual
septic systems would be installed.
Mr. Broadwell said the Comprehensive Plan calls for preserving natural character and minimizing
tree loss wherever possible. The 30’ front setback is a public facing space so it is a reasonable
public benefit to retain those trees and recommended a condition to Council that all of those
trees, minus those that need to be removed for driveways and utilities, be retained. This does
correspond with what the applicant has on the plat, which is the 20’ limited cut buffer, but
because the setback is 30’ and we have had similar projects staff finds it reasonable and
proportional to retain the trees in the entire setback area. The applicant has not yet explicitly
agreed to that condition.
The second proposed condition is regarding the red-cockaded woodpecker. Staff received a
letter from RLUAC in response to a request for agency comments stating that the site is well
within a couple of known clusters and highly recommended a habitat study.
Mr. Broadwell stated that overall, staff recommended approval of the application as it will be
generally consistent with the criteria for a Major Subdivision if the two conditions are addressed.
Member Scribner asked Mr. Broadwell asked with regard to preserving trees, how close the
property line is to the edge of the pavement given the significant drainage area.
Mr. Broadwell estimated the property line to be 10 to 15 feet from the pavement.
Eric Givens of The Ascot Corporation and Grosvenor Land Development stated that a portion of
the parcel on the north side of the property is supposed to be conveyed to Lot 242. He stated
that they are going to obtain a red-cockaded woodpecker study and they are waiting for the soils
report regarding the septic. They are willing to accommodate the 30’ setback as long as they
have room between the 30’ setback and the front of the homes to install the septic and if the
August 2025 Minutes Planning Board Regular Meeting Page 6 of 8
Page 7 of 32

[PAGE 8]
Town considers septic to be a utility, that should not be an issue. Mr. Givens said they will be
glad to keep as many trees as possible along the property.
Member Garner asked for more information regarding the drywells.
James Hindmarsh responded that he did not have the engineering plans and Mr. Givens said they
would be located on the high side of the lot.
Derek Markey, 445 E. Hedgelawn Way, raised concerns regarding drainage and the proximity of
septic systems to the property lines.
Adria Simpson, 1812 E. Indiana Avenue, expressed concerns regarding speeding vehicles and
recommended speed bumps.
Member Scribner asked the applicant if they would be keeping more trees than the existing lots
have.
Mr. Hindmarsh responded yes.
Chair Walden closed the preliminary forum.
Member Garner asked if anyone knew why this 4+ acre parcel was never developed.
Ed Rhodes stated that he was involved with Sandhurst South for the past 47 years. It was
developed in sections and the developer subdivided as lots were sold.
Member Scribner asked Mr. Broadwell if a traffic study had been performed.
Mr. Broadwell responded the Engineering staff or NCDOT did not have concerns.
Jason Scribner made a motion, seconded by Jennifer Garner to adopt the following for
transmission to the Town Council as a result of the August 21, 2025 preliminary forum on
application MAPP-03-25:
The information presented at the forum indicated that the following issue may be considered in
applying the criteria for a Major Subdivision Preliminary Plat to application MAPP-03-25:
1. There is a concern regarding traffic on Indiana Avenue and the danger of adding so many
driveway access points and also the speed at which people drive along that portion of
Indiana Avenue.
The motion carried by a vote of 5-0.
August 2025 Minutes Planning Board Regular Meeting Page 7 of 8
Page 8 of 32

[PAGE 9]
UNFINISHED BUSINESS:
Town Attorney Mac MacCarley presented a draft of the Planning Board Rules of Procedure,
explaining its purpose and content.
A brief discussion ensued.
Andrew Speck made a motion, seconded by Jason Scribner, to adopt the Rules of Procedure. The
motion carried by a vote of 5-0.
NEW BUSINESS:
Mr. Grieve stated that a Planned Development – Preliminary Development Plan was on the
September 2025 meeting agenda.
Andrew Speck made a motion, which was seconded by Jason Scribner, to adjourn the meeting.
The motion carried.
The meeting adjourned at 8:40 PM.
Respectfully submitted:
Cindy Williams
Secretary to the Planning Board
An audio recording of the meeting is available upon request.
August 2025 Minutes Planning Board Regular Meeting Page 8 of 8
Page 9 of 32

[PAGE 10]
Agenda Item
To: Planning Board
From: Mason Mattox, Planner II
Subject: PD-03-25: Planned Development District – Preliminary
Development Plan for Veterans Guardian in the
Southern Pines Corporate Park
Date: September 18, 2025
I. SUMMARY OF APPLICATION REQUEST
Tim Carpenter, on behalf of Veterans Guardian, has submitted a Planned Development
District – Preliminary Development Plan application pursuant to §2.18.5 of the Town
of Southern Pines Unified Development Ordinance to develop a 27,390 SF office
building on +8.67 acres of Southern Pines Corporate Park. The subject parcels are
located on the west side of Air Tool Drive between Yadkin Road and US Hwy 1 and
identified as PIN 858200940151 (PARID 20200432) and PIN 858200844641 (PARID
00039569). Per the Moore County tax record, the subject parcels are owned by BAT
Properties, LLC, and RAB Investments, LLC, respectively.
II. PROJECT INFORMATION
A. Property Owners
BAT Properties, LLC RAB Investments, LLC
(Adam Kiker) (George Christopher Jordan)
140 Aqua Shed Court [312 Fields Drive
Aberdeen, NC 28315 Aberdeen, NC 28315]
B. Applicant C. Authorized Agent
Veterans Guardian Tim Carpenter
(Mark Christensen) (LKC Engineering)
D. Property Information
• Street Address: Air Tool Drive.
• Size of Property: +8.67 Acres.
• Property Zoning: The current zoning of the subject property is PD
(Planned Development) with two active entitlements: a Conditional Use
Permit (File #CU-03-06) and a Conceptual Development Plan (File #Z-01-
14). The subject property falls fully within the High-Quality/Protected
Watershed Protection Overlay. Wetlands are also present on the site; see
Figure 3 for more details.
PD-03-25 Veterans Guardian September 2025 Planning Board 1
Page 10 of 32

[PAGE 11]
Figure 1: Vicinity Aerial Image
Figure 2: Vicinity Zoning Map
PD-03-25 Veterans Guardian September 2025 Planning Board 2
Page 11 of 32

[PAGE 12]
Figure 3: Wetland Locations
Figure 4: Preliminary Development Plan
PD-03-25 Veterans Guardian September 2025 Planning Board 3
Page 12 of 32

[PAGE 13]
III. STAFF REVIEW
A. Application Review Dates
• Approval of CDP (#Z-01-14): May 13, 2014
• Consultation with the Technical Review Committee: June 17, 2025
• Preliminary Development Plan Application Submitted: July 28, 2025
• Application Deemed Complete: August 26, 2025
• Notice of September 18, 2025, Planning Board Preliminary Forum:
Posted On-site: August 27, 2025
o
Mailed: August 27, 2025
o
Internet: August 27, 2025
o
Published: September 03 and September 10, 2025
o
• Request for Agency Comments: August 27, 2025
B. Process and Standards of Review
Applications for a Planned Development District (PD) are reviewed in accordance
with UDO §2.18. Creating a Planned Development District is a three-step process
including Conceptual Development Plan (CDP), Preliminary Development Plan
(PDP), and Final Development Plan (FDP). This application is for a PDP.
C. Applicable Criteria for Review
The criteria for review and approval of a PDP are found in Chapter 2, §2.18.5(H),
of the Town of Southern Pines Unified Development Ordinance. The applicants
have provided a narrative addressing the purpose of a Planned Development per
UDO §2.18.5(A), and addressing the criteria for a PDP per UDO §2.18.5(H).
Copies of the applicant’s narrative documents containing their descriptions of the
project’s alignment with applicable criteria are attached to this staff report. Staff
analysis of how the application addresses these four (4) criteria begins below:
Preliminary Development Plan - UDO §2.18.5(H)
1. The application demonstrates that it will achieve the purposes of the PD
and this section.
The applicant’s narrative states that the PD purpose will be met by delivering a
high-quality Veteran Affairs service facility that qualifies as a supportive use
under the CDP, strengthening economic diversity and local employment, and
advancing coordinated site design and infrastructure efficiency. It also
demonstrates compliance with dimensional standards and the 25% cap on
supportive uses. Planning staff agrees that this Preliminary Development Plan
application meets the intentions of the Planned Development.
2. The Preliminary Development Plan is consistent with the Conceptual
Development Plan and conforms to all applicable provisions of this UDO;
PD-03-25 Veterans Guardian September 2025 Planning Board 4
Page 13 of 32

[PAGE 14]
Architectural Compliance
An Architectural Compliance Permit will be required as a part of Site Plan
review, as the land use is not Industrial by nature, and is therefore not exempt
from the Architectural requirements of UDO §2.16 and UDO §4.10.4.
Impervious Surface
The PDP includes future expansions to the proposed office building; one 40’
expansion to the north, and one 40’ expansion to the west. Once fully built-out,
the site will have an impervious surface percentage at approximately 51.27%,
according to the applicant. No watershed protection permit has been approved
nor watershed credits allocated to the subject properties to-date. Watershed
allocation for the full 8.68 acres will be required if the application is to continue
beyond the 24% limit, and staff therefore encourage submittal of this request
prior to proceeding.
Open Space and Connectivity
The entire Corporate Park is required to have 20.958 acres of open space, of
which 10.479 acres must be usable. This PDP does not propose any open space,
instead citing the Conceptual Open Space Plan of the CDP, which indeed does
not display open space as being present on this tract of land.
Parking
The CDP requires one parking space per every 250 square feet of gross floor
area as a minimum. The proposed office building would be 27,390 sf, meaning
that 110 automobile spaces are required. The application proposes 246 spaces,
with 12 being accessible spaces. The CDP neither requires nor exempts bicycle
parking; therefore Planning staff noted §UDO 4.5 which requires 1 bicycle
space per 5,000 square feet of floor area for the land use of professional offices.
Therefore, the required number of bicycle parking spaces is six, to which the
PDP application matches.
Proposed Land Use
The land use of Veteran Affairs (LBCS 6567) is explicitly listed in the CDP as
a Non-Industrial (Supportive) use, permitted within the Corporate Park. The
Planned Development also requires that there is a minimum of 75% industrial
land uses, and a maximum of 25% of non-industrial/supporting uses.
Planned Development Acreage: 83.832
Industrial Minimum: 62.874 Non-Industrial Maximum 20.598
Industrial Still Needed: 37.235 Non-Industrial Remaining: 11.92
(Pending approval of this PDP)
PD-03-25 Veterans Guardian September 2025 Planning Board 5
Page 14 of 32

[PAGE 15]
Tree Protection
As displayed in Figure 1, the site is presently densely wooded. Staff find that
full clearing of the site would remove valued natural character, which the 2040
Comprehensive Plan (Policies 4.9 and 4.10) seek to preserve. As such, pursuant
to the PDP criteria for approval, the purpose of the PDP (under UDO §2.18.5),
and Comprehensive Plan policies 4.9 and 4.10, staff will recommend that
Council adopt a condition to preserve this natural character, with language
similar to that below:
Condition Example:
All existing trees, 10-inch diameter and larger, that do not interfere with
essential site grading or the installation of building footprints, vehicle access
areas, or utilities shall be preserved to protect the town's natural character.
• The developer shall identify, during site plan review, which trees will be
retained and which trees are essential to remove. Town staff shall confirm
that the trees are essential to remove before approving the site plan.
• Town staff will also verify tree protection fencing for trees counting toward
existing vegetation credit and any other necessary aspects of this condition
during site plan review.
• The developer may request a reduction in tree protection fence radius for
trees counting toward existing vegetation credit under UDO §4.3.13. Town
staff shall grant requested tree protection fence radius reductions contingent
on Town Arborist concurrence that a given reduction will not significantly
impinge tree viability.
A condition that keeps this application consistent with the 2040 Comprehensive
Plan, that are also proportionate and reasonable given the scope of the project,
also ensure consistency with the first criterion of the PDP.
Wetlands
The presence of wetlands on site will almost certainly present challenges if the
current preliminary site plan remains unchanged (see Figures 3 and 4). A minor
reorientation of the parking areas away from the wetlands could address these
concerns, while preserving a natural stormwater feature, which staff
recommend adjusting prior to the Town Council Evidentiary Hearing.
Otherwise, the Town Council may consider a condition requiring such a
reconfiguration, accompanied by a wetland’s delineation showing that the
adjusted parking areas are clear of wetland impacts. If the applicant chooses not
to modify the site plan, coordination with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
would be required to obtain the necessary permits to construct within wetlands.
Staff will recommend that the applicant obtain a wetlands delineation regardless
of the outcome.
PD-03-25 Veterans Guardian September 2025 Planning Board 6
Page 15 of 32

[PAGE 16]
Conclusion
The Preliminary Development Plan (PDP) is generally consistent with the
approved Conceptual Development Plan (CDP) in terms of land use, site layout,
and dimensional standards, maintaining the intended Corporate Park
development pattern. The plan conforms to applicable setbacks, exceeds the
minimum parking requirements, and aligns with the CDP’s open space
provisions according to the Open Space Map contained within the CDP file.
Outstanding considerations include the presence of wetlands in proximity to the
proposed parking areas and the site’s existing dense vegetation. Staff
recommend the reorientation of the parking area to avoid wetlands, thereby
protecting natural resources and mitigating potential permitting issues with the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Staff further recommend a condition to preserve
significant trees pursuant to the policies of the 2040 Comprehensive Plan.
Finally, impervious surface coverage currently exceeds the 24$ threshold but
may be allowed up to 70%, contingent on Council approval of watershed
allocation.
3. The proposed Development is located in an area of the Town that is
appropriate.
The proposed development is located in an appropriate area of the Town, within
the boundaries of the Southern Pines Corporate Park. This location is
designated as an Employment Center in the Town’s 2040 Comprehensive Plan
and is intended to accommodate office, industrial, and supportive uses. The
project is compatible with surrounding land uses, which include other
industrial, administrative, and storage facilities. The Corporate Park benefits
from strong transportation connections, especially to US-1, making it a suitable
and strategic location for offices.
4. The proposed Development will not cause the need for inefficient
extensions and expansions of public facilities, utilities, and services.
The proposed development will not result in any inefficient extensions of public
infrastructure. The property already has access to public water from Air Tool
Drive, and public sewer from Air Tool Drive and Tyler Industrial Court. Other
necessary infrastructure such as stormwater management measures will be
contained entirely within the northern portion of the site. The project is
therefore expected to integrated efficiently into existing infrastructure without
creating a strain on demands.
IV. OUTSIDE AGENCY REVIEW AND COMMENTS
A request for comments was emailed to agencies on August 27, 2025. Agencies notified
include Town of Southern Pines Streets, Utilities, Fire, Recreation and Parks, and
Engineering departments, the Regional Land Use Advisory Commission, U.S. Fish and
PD-03-25 Veterans Guardian September 2025 Planning Board 7
Page 16 of 32

[PAGE 17]
Wildlife Service, Moore County Airport and the North Carolina Department of
Transportation. As of September 11, 2025, only the Regional Land Use Advisory
Commission (RLUAC) has noted that the site is designated as “Important to Protect”
within Fort Bragg’s High-Quality Waters drainage area and encourages measures to
limit stormwater runoff impacts on McDeeds Creek; while the proposed development
poses no military compatibility concerns, RLUAC’s non-binding recommendations,
provided as Attachment #4, aim to support overall regional environmental and military
mission compatibility. Any additional agency comments received between the writing
of this report and the preliminary forum will be presented at the forum.
V. ATTACHMENTS
The following materials have been provided as attachments to this staff memorandum:
1. Application
2. Applicant’s Narrative
3. Applicant’s Plans
4. RLUAC Letter
VI. PLANNING BOARD ACTION
Pursuant to North Carolina General Statute §160D-301(b)(6) and Unified
Development Ordinance §2.5.2, the Planning Board may hold a Preliminary Forum on
a matter requiring a quasi-judicial decision by the Town Council. However, no part of
the forum or any recommendation may be used as a basis for the deciding board.
Therefore, the Planning Board may wish to use the following motion to identify issues
to bring to the attention of the Town Council at the evidentiary hearing, or any modified
motion.
I move to transmit the following list of issues to the Town Council as a result of
the September 18, 2025 Preliminary Forum on application PD-03-25:
1.
PD-03-25 Veterans Guardian September 2025 Planning Board 8
Page 17 of 32

[PAGE 18]
PLANNED DECELOPMENT DISTRICT
Application for:
PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN
REQUIRED APPLICATION MATERIALS:
_____ Application fee in the amount of $1,800.00 plus $25.00 per lot.
_____ Completed Application for a Planned Development District - Preliminary Development Plan signed
by the applicant.
_____ Appointment of Agent, if applicable, signed by the property owner(s) and the agent.
____ List of Adjacent Property Owners: Please list all properties that are that are within two hundred (200)
feet of the outermost boundaries of the subject property (not counting streets, railroads or other
transportation corridors). Attach additional pages if needed. No fewer than ten (10) property owners shall
be notified by mail.
_____ Written narrative describing the application’s consistency with the Conceptual Development Plan,
the UDO, and any other applicable regulations.
_____ Neighborhood meeting records if not provided in conjunction with an application for Conceptual
Development Plan approval or if additional meetings have been held.
_____ Additional documentation: Additional text and/or maps to demonstrate consistency with UDO
§2.18.5(H) Criteria (1) through (4).
_____ PDD Preliminary Development Plan: One (1) full-size copy of a preliminary plat or scaled drawings
of the entire tract to be subdivided. Please refer to the UDO Appendices for plan requirements.
_____ Drainage concept plan if applicable.
_____ Traffic Impact Analysis if applicable.
_____ Electronic copy (PDF) of all application materials submitted to plan@southernpines.net.
PLEASE SUBMIT ONLY ONE (1) COMPLETE SET OF ALL MATERIALS.
REVIEW AND APPROVAL:
1. Staff review: Planning staff will review the application and notify the applicant if additional
information or materials are needed.
2. Public hearing: The applicant is expected to attend a public hearing on the application before the
Town Council at its regular monthly meeting. (Please refer to the Application Processing Timeline
to determine the hearing date.) The Town Council will consider evidence and testimony presented
and may approve, conditionally approve or deny the request.
3. Approval: Please refer to UDO §2.18.5(I) Effect of Approval.
11/08/2024
Page 18 of 32

[PAGE 19]
PLANNED DECELOPMENT DISTRICT
Application for:
PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN
OFFICE USE ONLY:
Fee: $________ Date Received: _____________ Case No.: PD-____-____
Project Information:
Project Name: ________________________________________________________________________________
Physical Address: ______________________________________________________________________________
PIN: _______________________________________ Parcel ID: ________________________________
Site Size: ___________________________________ Zoning: __________________________________
Applicant:
Name(s): _____________________________________________________________________________________
Email: ____________________________________ Phone: __________________________________
Mailing Address: _______________________________________________________________________________
Authorized Agent, if different from Applicant:
Name(s): _____________________________________________________________________________________
Email: ____________________________________ Phone: __________________________________
Mailing Address:
Legal Property Owner(s), if different from Applicant:
Name(s): ___________________________________________________________________________________
Email: ____________________________________ Phone: _________________________________
Mailing Address:
11/08/2024
Page 19 of 32

[PAGE 20]
PLANNED DECELOPMENT DISTRICT
Application for:
PRELIMINARY DEVELOPMENT PLAN
TO THE TOWN OF SOUTHERN PINES PLANNING BOARD AND TOWN COUNCIL:
I, the undersigned, do hereby make application to and petition the Planning Board and Town Council for
approval of a Planned Development District – Preliminary Development Plan as required by the Town of
Southern Pines Zoning Ordinance. The following information is submitted in support of this application:
The property which is the subject of this application is located on the ________ side of
_____________ (St./Ave.), between _________________ (St./Ave.) and _________________ (St./
Ave.). The property has a frontage of ___________ feet and a depth of _____________ feet.
The request is based upon Section 2.18.5 of the Town of Southern Pines Unified Development
Ordinance. The proposed use of the property is as follows:
Date: _____________________ ____________________________________________
Applicant
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
TOWN OF SOUTHERN PINES
801 SE Service Road, Southern Pines, NC 28387
plan@southernpines.net (910) 692-4003 www.southernpines.net
11/08/2024
Page 20 of 32

[PAGE 21]
Page 21 of 32

[PAGE 22]
Page 22 of 32

[PAGE 23]
Page 23 of 32

[PAGE 24]
UDO §2.18 Planned Development
§2.18.5(H) Preliminary Development Plan Criteria
(1) The application demonstrates that it will achieve the purposes of the PDD and this section;
(2) The Preliminary Development Plan is consistent with the Conceptual Development Plan and
conforms to all applicable provisions of this UDO;
(3) The proposed Development is located in an area of the Town that is appropriate; and
(4) The proposed Development will not cause the need for inefficient extensions and expansions of
public facilities, utilities and services.
11/08/2024
Page 24 of 32

[PAGE 25]
Preliminary Development Plan Narrative
Veterans Guardian Corporate Headquarters
Southern Pines Corporate Park | Town of Southern Pines, NC
General Description:
This Preliminary Development Plan (PDP) is submitted for the proposed Veterans Guardian
corporate office, to be located within the Southern Pines Corporate Park. The subject parcel
(Lot #7) contains approximately 8.67 acres and is situated on Air Tool Drive, between US Hwy 1
and Yadkin Rd. The project site lies within an existing Planned Development (PD) zoning district
as approved under Zoning Case Z-01-14 in May 2014.
Veterans Guardian is a professional services company that supports United States Veterans by
providing expert assistance in navigating VA processes for benefits acquisition. The proposed
development is classified under LBCS Code 6567 (Veteran Affairs) and is listed as a permitted
supportive land use in the PD zoning documents adopted under Z-01-14.
The site will include the development of a 27,390 square foot, two-story office building, 246
off-street automobile parking spaces (including 12 accessible spaces), and 6 bicycle parking
spaces. The project also includes required landscaping, buffers, and stormwater facilities. No
additional open space is required on this lot as the overall PD open space requirement has
been met within the boundaries of the Corporate Park as a whole.
Compliance with UDO Section 2.18.5(H) Criteria:
(1) Achieving the Purposes of the PDD and this Section
The proposed development fulfills the purposes of the Planned Development District (PDD) and
the requirements of UDO Section 2.18 by:
• Contributing to the intent of the PD district, which allows for a coordinated mix of
industrial and supportive uses in a campus-style setting;
• Providing a high-quality facility for Veteran Affairs-related services, which aligns with
the supportive uses described in Table 1a of Z-01-14;
• Enhancing the economic diversity of the Corporate Park and supporting the
employment base of Southern Pines;
• Promoting efficiency in land use, coordinated infrastructure, and site design as
envisioned in the original PD approval;
____________________________________
LKC Engineering, PLLC, 140 Aqua Shed Court, Aberdeen, North Carolina 28315
PH: 910/420-1437 * License No. P-1095
Page 25 of 32

[PAGE 26]
PDP Narrative – Veterans Guardian
Page 2 of 5
• Complying with all dimensional standards and land allocation ratios (i.e., maintaining
supportive uses within the allowed 25% cap).
(2) Consistency with the Conceptual Development Plan and UDO
This PDP is consistent with the Conceptual Development Plan (CDP) adopted for the Corporate
Park. The development:
• Matches the intended land use pattern outlined in the PD Site Plan;
• Adheres to zoning regulations established in Z-01-14 including setbacks, parking, site
coverage (46.09% of parcel, below 70% max), and use category;
• Supports the PD zoning’s requirement that 75% of developable land be reserved for
industrial uses and no more than 25% be developed as supportive uses;
• Relies on shared open space requirements met by the larger development (20.96 acres
required; 23.68 acres provided across the Corporate Park);
• Is aligned with the Town’s Comprehensive Plan, the Official Zoning Map, and the design
principles of the Unified Development Ordinance (UDO).
(3) Appropriate Location within the Town
The development is ideally located within a designated Planned Development node at the
intersection of major corridors (US Hwy 1 and Air Tool Drive), which is identified for corporate,
industrial, and supportive office growth. The site:
• Lies within the bounds of a master-planned and previously approved PD district;
• Is adjacent to other compatible industrial and supportive land uses (e.g.,
manufacturing, storage, and administrative services);
• Provides easy access to transportation and utilities without burdening adjacent
residential areas.
(4) No Inefficient Extension of Public Infrastructure
The project will not require any new or inefficient expansions of public infrastructure.
Specifically:
• The property is already has access to public water and sewer that is located in and
along Air Tool Drive.
• The site is accessed directly fr om Air Tool Drive, an existing public road;
• Internal infrastructure (e.g., parking, drainage, landscaping) is contained wholly within
the lot boundaries and in compliance with the Town’s design and performance
standards.
Page 26 of 32

[PAGE 27]
PDP Narrative – Veterans Guardian
Page 3 of 5
Conclusion:
The Veterans Guardian Corporate Office project meets all criteria under UDO Section 2.18.5(H)
and is fully consistent with the goals and requirements of the Planned Development zoning in
Southern Pines. It will provide an essential public service use that supports veterans, while
complementing the industrial and employment-focused character of the Southern Pines
Corporate Park. All applicable provisions of the UDO, Conceptual Development Plan, and Zoning
Case Z-01-14 are satisfied in this application. Accordingly, we respectfully request approval of
this PDP.
2040 Comprehensive Plan References
In the Town’s 2040 Comprehensive Plan there are several sections in which the Corporate Park
are mention or have relevance and to which we believe that this submittal is consistent with the
Comprehensive Plan.
The Southern Pines Corporate Park is shown as an “Employment Center” in the comprehensive
plan Conservation and Development Map.
EMPLOYMENT CENTERS: This category describes land providing opportunities to concentrate
employment in the town’s planning jurisdiction on normal workdays. They support both large-
and small-scale offices, warehouses, manufacturing centers, or flex space buildings organized as
1) large, single-use centers or 2) multi-business centers that support and serve one another. Office
developments should typically be buffered from surrounding development by transitional uses or
landscaped areas, and should be located in close proximity to major highways or thoroughfares.
Industrial developments should typically be buffered from surrounding development by tree
preservation areas or landscaped areas that vary in type and size as a function of the activities
being performed on the site. They should be located in close proximity to major highway or
railroad corridors. In large employment centers, space should be reserved for athletic fields,
walking trails, or nature preserves that are accessible to employees and the public. Walking trails
on a site should connect to the town’s proposed greenway network when possible. Small retail
buildings may be included in larger employment centers to serve employees’ daily needs (e.g., dry
cleaner, small restaurant, or convenience store). Employment Center
Page 27 of 32

[PAGE 28]
PDP Narrative – Veterans Guardian
Page 4 of 5
In the Comprehensive Plan the Corporate Park is considered a Suburban Settlement under Character
Districts of the Plan:
Suburban Settlements Suburban settlements represent more traditional suburban-style
development types, patterns, and intensities observed throughout the United States for the last
several decades: shopping centers, office parks, industrial parks, singlefamily neighborhoods, or
apartment complexes. Non-residential buildings may include franchise architecture or signage.
Residential buildings may be limited to the type and number of models offered by the
neighborhood developer. Large surface parking lots and lower levels of landscaping are typical in
the settlements. Suburban settlements are located throughout the town’s planning area,
including U.S. 501, Morganton Road, May Street, Air Tool Drive, Midland Road, and several
isolated developments in and around the more rural portions of the town’s planning area.
Page 28 of 32

[PAGE 29]
PDP Narrative – Veterans Guardian
Page 5 of 5
2040 Comp Plan Policies
Page 29 of 32

[PAGE 30]
PROPERTY LINE DATA:
NORTH
W)
Y
1 O-
W R-
S
H
6
0' INGERSOL
U
C
2
RAND LI
B
U
P
( CAROLINA
SELF
STORAGE
( A
P IR
U
B T
L O NATIONAL
ICO
6 0 L D ATHLETIC
' R
-
R IV VILLAGE
O E
-
W LOT 1
)
5.05 ACRES
UPS
CLASSICAL
PROPERTY OWNERS:
CONVERSATIONS
SOUTHERN PINES CORPORATE PARK OWNER:
RAB INVESTMENTS
P.O.BOX 4406
PINEHURST, NC, 28374-4406
PARCEL ID #: 00039569
LOT 2 DEED BOOK: 3032, PAGE: 356
4.26 ACRES LOTS WITHIN SOUTHERN PINES CORPORATE PARK OWNERS:
LOT #1: LILY COMMERCIAL LOT #5: WM KING & ANNIE MCKINEY
255 AIR TOOL DRIVE 328 MELROSE DRIVE
SOUTHERN PINES, NC, 28387 CONCORD, NC, 28025-5479
PARCEL ID #: 20071012 PARCEL ID #: 00035384
DEED BOOK: 4609, PAGE: 458 DEED BOOK: 385, PAGE: 702
LOT #2: LILY COMMERCIAL LOT #6: PALM COMMERCIAL MANAGEMENT LLC
255 AIR TOOL DRIVE PO BOX 1341
SOUTHERN PINES, NC, 28387 SOUTHERN PINES, NC, 28388
PARCEL ID #: 20160039 PARCEL ID #: 20200431
DEED BOOK: 4609, PAGE: 484 DEED BOOK: 5853, PAGE: 522
D
A
O ) LOT #3 : JADE GREEN, LLC LOT #7: BAT PROPERTIES, LLC
R W 100 MAGNOLIA ROAD 140 AQUA SHED CT
NC SELF T O - PINEHURST, NC, 28374 ABERDEEN, NC, 28315
STORAGE A N R - PARCEL ID #: 20150334 PARCEL ID #: 20200432
L0' DEED BOOK: 4929, PAGE: 59 DEED BOOK: 5378, PAGE: 343
P6
E C
LI LOT #4: YADKIN PLACE, LLC LOT #8 AMAZON.COM SERVICES, LLC
M B B L P.O. BOX 4406 PO BOX 80416
I U PINEHURST, NC, 28374-4406 SEATTLE, WA, 98108
RP
T ( PARCEL ID #: 00039763 PARCEL ID #: 20240897
DEED BOOK: 4542, PAGE: 272 DEED BOOK: 6279, PAGE: 303
PROJECT DATA:
STORMWATER
MANAGEMENT CORPORATE PARK TOTAL ACRES: 104.79 ac.
AREA
TYLER IN TY D L (P E U ( R R P I V R S I A N IV T T D E A U R T 60 S E ' I T E R A 6 A R IG 0 S I L A H ' E L T A M - C C O C E F C N T O - E W T S A ) U S Y) R 30 T ' REAR BUILDING SETBACK L L L L L O O O O O T T T T T # # # # # 1 2 3 4 5 : : : : : 5 4 3 4 0 . . . . . 0 2 0 8 4 5 6 9 2 7 a a a a a c c c c c . . . . . ( ( ( ( ( L L J B W A I I A L L M D I Y Y D E K A C C I G N N O O R G M M G E M M & R E E E O N A R R U , N C C L P N L I I , I A A C E L L L ) L M ) ) C C ) KINEY)
LOT #6: 3.46 ac. (PALM COMMERCIAL MANAGEMENT)
HA
B
M
EA
IL
C
T
H
ON STORM
DRAINAGE
PIPING
L
L
R
O
O
E
T
T
M A
#
#
7
8
IN
:
:
I N
3
1
.
5
G
5
.
1
7
L
6
a
A
9
c
N
.
a
D
(
c
B
.
:
A
(
6
A
T
4
M
.
P
3
A
R
6
Z
O
a
A
P
c
O
.
E
N
(
R
R
.C
T
A
I
O
B
E
M
S
IN
,
S
V
L
E
L
E
R
C
S
V
)
T
I
M
S
E
E
N
S,
T
L
S
L
)
C)
STORM D DR U AIN M AGE P M P S IP E IN T Y C G E A H R RA DNICAL T GEN. FUTU B R U E I L 4 D 0 E ' IN XP G ANSION LOU C WP O P EE R B U R L L R U E O LE V T W V E I Y L E L E A L F D R R F F E F D I E : R N 4 : E 1 A 4 E N 7 B 3 G C . M 1 0 T I . K K 0 0 R P 0 S E L YOYE E E B X F U P U I AL T N D U S IN R IO G E N 40' 40' FRONT BUILDING SETBACK AIR TOO 0 (PU 3 L BL 4 I D C 6 R 0' R IV IGH E T-OF-WAY) D ZO ED N O I I C N P A E G N T : S E P P D D A C O ( E P P E R R E E Q N A U P I S P R R E P O D A : V 1 C E 0 D 4 E . 7 P : 9 D 2 x 0 Z . O 2 % 0 N = I G N 2 G R 0 . A 9 O 5 M 8 S E a N S c D . A ME R N E T A A P ( P R L E I Q C U AT IR IO E N D , ) MAY 2014, Z-01-14)
1S E T N FFM T L=A4 R 29I Y 'N OPEN SPACE PROVIDED: 23.68 ac.
YAD KIN R O AD (PU BLIC 80'
R -O -W
20' L 1 A 0 0 N ' S D I S D C E . A B P U 4 E I L B D U IN F
7
F G E S R ET B L A
A
CK O
C
T
5
AIR ( T P O U O BL L I C D R 6 I 0 V ' E R-O-W) 30' UTILITY 3 E 0 A ' S U E T M IL E IT N Y T EASEMENT
W) O A D
DEVE I U U E C N X S S O L D
L
I E E M S O U
O
A A T M S
T
B B P I T N O L L
#
A R G E E
1
N I
:
B A O O D O
L
L L
A
E P P P L E
N
V E E E A E N N
D
N N L L S S
U
S D O A P P
S
P P U N A A
E
A E S C C
#
C D D E E E E
4
: I
2
( N R P P 7
1
8 D R 5 E R
1
1 % U Q O
-
O .
N
S U V V 1 O T
E
I I I 1 D R D F R
W
E E E D I a A
S
D D D E c L
P
: : V ( .
A
1 7 5 L E 6
P
. A 0 3 L . %
E
N 3 1 O 7
R
D a P O
S
: a c A F c
,
. B . 9
B
R L ( .
O
8 6 E E 7 .
O
Q 4 L a 1
K
U A c
S
I a N . R
,
c D E .
P
) W D
E
:
R
6 E O 0
I
T
O
P . L 8 E
D
A 3 N
I
N
C
a S D c
A
. P S
L
A
S
@ C
, E
E 3
T
) 9
C
= .1
.
1 5 0 % .4 T 7 O 9 T a A c. L USABLE OPEN SPACE)
) R E R/ R LOT #4: LAND USE# 3000- MANUFACTURING AND WHOLESALE TRADE
S LOT 3
0
0' AI L PROPOSED INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT: 15.769 ac.
2 R LOT #8: LAND USE - DISTRIBUTION CENTER
3.09 ACRES ( X
S REMAINING INDUSTRIAL ACRES: 35.19 ac.
C
SUPPORTIVE LAND USE (25% OF DEVELOPABLE LAND): 20.28 ac.
EXISTING DEVELOPED SUPPORTIVE LAND USE: 0.00 ac.
PROPOSED SUPPORTIVE DEVELOPMENT: 8.68 ac.
RECOMBINED LOT #7: LAND USE # 6567- VETERAN AFFAIRS
REMAINING SUPPORTIVE ACRES: 11.60 ac.
IMPERVIOUS SURFACE: 56.78 ac. (TOTAL IMPERVIOUS ALLOWED)
E
VW ) INDUSTRIAL LAND USE (70% OF DEVELOPABLE LAND: 60.83ac): 42.58 ac. (INCLUDES AIR TOOL DRIVE R-O-W)
RI- EXISTING DEVELOPED INDUSTRIAL LAND: 7.51 ac.
O
D
- PROPOSED INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT: 9.37 ac.
O
T HI A N
LI
C 6 0' R AIR T (P O UB O LIC L 6 0 D ' RI R GH I T V -OF E -WAY) R SU EM PP A O IN R IN TI G V E IN L D A U N S D T R U I S A E L ( A 7 C 0 R % E O S F : D E V E L O P 2 A 5 B .7 L 0 E a L c A . ND: 20.28ac): 14.20 ac.
LB EXISTING DEVELOPED SUPPORTIVE LAND USE: 0.00 ac.
DU
MIP PROPOSED SUPPORTIVE DEVELOPMENT: 4.45 ac. (INCLUDING FUTURE USE)
( REMAINING SUPPORTIVE ACRES: 9.75 ac.
LOT 4
WATERSHED: (PER MOORE COUNTY G.I.S. DATA)
E
T W) 4.82 ACRES BASIN: CAPE FEAR RIVER
R
E O- STREAM: LITTLE RIVER (INTAKE #2)
TR- TYPE: WS-III-BW
K
S
6 0' HIGH QUALITY WATERS: YES
A R C FLOOD ZONE: NONE L LI
CB
U
P
(
kraP
etaroproC
seniP
nrehtuoS
kraP
etaroproC
nalP
etiS
DDP
REVISIONS
SYM. DESCRIPTION DATE BY
L O
T
1 8 5 .7
A 6 9 C
R E S
LOT 7 3.51 ACRES
L 3 O
.4 T
6
A
6
C
R
E
S
DATE:
DESIGNED:
DRAWN:
CHECKED:
NO.
L-1
cllp
,gnireenignE
CKL
truoC
dehS
auqA
041
(cid:74)(cid:81)(cid:76)(cid:85)(cid:72)(cid:72)(cid:81)(cid:76)(cid:74)(cid:81)E
51382
CN
,needrebA
7341.024.019
:O
(cid:72)(cid:85)(cid:88)(cid:87)(cid:70)(cid:72)(cid:87)(cid:76)(cid:75)(cid:70)(cid:85)A
(cid:72)(cid:83)(cid:68)(cid:70)(cid:86)(cid:71)(cid:81)(cid:68)L
6900.736.019
:F
(cid:74)(cid:81)(cid:76)(cid:92)(cid:72)(cid:89)(cid:85)(cid:88)S
moc.gnireenigneckl 5901-P
.oN
esneciL
2.29 ACRES
4.00 ACRES
10.43 ACRES 5.17 ACRES 7.86 ACRES
9.62 ACRES
7-8-25
Page 30 of 32

[PAGE 31]
NORTH
PROPERTY OWNERS:
CURRENT OWNERS:
RAB INVESTMENTS
P.O.BOX 4406
PINEHURST, NC, 28374-4406
PARCEL ID #: 00039569
DEED BOOK: 3032, PAGE: 356
PROPOSED OWNER:
STORMWATER
75 TROTTER HILLS CIRCLE, LLC
MANAGEMENT
75 TROTTER HILLS CIR
PINEHURST, NC,28374
AREA
PARCEL ID #: 96000379
T DEED BOOK: 6103, PAGE: 191
C
L S
S
A E
T Y L E R P R I N I V D A U T
S
E E
T
6 A
R
0 S
I
' E
A
M C
C
E
C
N O
T)
U R T P
P
R
R
O A P
O
R E E R
J
C T O
E
M Y B
C
A IN C
T
AT R I O E
D
N S O
A
: F 8 E
T
.6 X 8 I
A
S T a I
:
N c G . LOT#7 (BAT PROPERTIES) 3.51 acs. PLUS 5.17 acs. OF
(
L Y) C
K
CORPORATE
A W A B A PARK LAND (RAB INVESTMANTS) TO FORM A NEW LOT#7 OF 8.68 acs.
R I
O
F-
E
T
S T H T- G S ZONING: PD (PER APPROVED PD ZONING AMENDMENT APPLICATION, MAY 2014)
G N
N
D
U
E
6 0'
RI
UI L
DI
DEDICATED OPEN SPACE: 0
R
I
RI
V A T
A
R B S
S
E
P
E
A C
S
E
O U
A
T
R
H
E
E
A
R
.
N PINES CORPORATE PARK PDD SITE PLAN FOR ALL CORPORATE PARK OPEN
P E
E ( R
L 0' LAND USE : SUPPORTIVE LAND, 20.28 ac. TOTAL CORP. PARK ACRES
Y 3
T EXISTING DEVELOPED SUPPORTIVE LAND USE: 0.00 ac.
PROPOSED SUPPORTIVE DEVELOPMENT: 8.68 ac.
REMAINING CORP. PARK SUPPORTIVE ACRES: 11.60 ac.
INTENDED LAND USE:
S LAND USE: #6567 - VETERAN AFFAIRS (PER Z-01-14)
T
O
R
M PROJECT IMPERVIOUS SURFACE: 4.45 ac. (51.27% OF PROPERTY AREA)
D
R 4.0 IMPERVIOUS ac. (INCLUDES FUTURE DEVELOPMENT) / 8.68 ac. = 51.27%
A
IN
A PARKING:
G
E AUTOMOBILE PARKING: 1 SPACE / 250 sf (PER Z-1-14)
P 27,390 sf / 250 = 110 AUTOMOBILE SPACES REQUIRED
IP
IN 246 AUTOMOBILE SPACES PROVIDED
G (12 HANDICAP, 234 STANDARD)
BICYCLE PARKING: 1 SPACE / 5000sf
27,390 sf / 5000 = 6 BICYCLE SPACES REQUIRED
6 BICYCLE SPACES PROVIDED
S T O R M D D R A U IN M
A G E
P M
P I
S
P
E
IN
T Y C
G
E A H R R A D N IC AL T
G
E N.
F U T U B R U E I L 4 D 0 E ' I X N P G A N SI O N LO U C W P O P E E R B U R L L R U O E LE T V W V E I Y E L L E A L F D R R F F F E D I E :
R
N 4 : E
A
1 4 E N 7 3
B
G
C
. 1 M T 0
I
.
K K
0 0 R P 0
S E
Y LO YE
E
E
B X F U P U I A L T N D U S IN R IO G E
N
40'
4 0' F R O N T B UI L DI N G S E T
B A C K
A I R T O O
0
P U
3
L B L
4
I D C 6 R 0' R I V I G H E T- O F- W A Y) U
L O A
T
P N
I
E
L P
D
F
O
T
B
U T W
N
I R T O H O
E
N
P S
A O E
E
I R
E
W I
S
T F E
C
P
N N
P E I W N
P
E E S
A
R R
S
R D
P
A
A
O : O
P P
T
R
A T F
C
D P
A
Y
I
E N
O N
E S O
C E
R D
V
H V O
E
S
G I :
A A E S
D
U E
P
S N L E
: E
T D
R
O D W
D
H A
O
S P C E E S
W
I
V
M T R C R E
I I
E E
D
N E W
T
C N S
E H
W E P O T S
D I
R I
N
I N N L
:
O T L N
0
S E
T
O R
H
E H S B
a
D E C .
c E
A E I
.
X N T L
B
P
(
L I I A S O
O A
L N B T A
L
N
U
E C I
L
N S N
N
E T R
O
, G
D
. E M E
P A
P D Q E
E R
U T
N
U A
IE
B E N I
S
R
S
L R D I
P
E C S
O A
D I , R
F
W
C
V T R
T E
A A O I
H
G L T
R E
V S E A
E
E E R T
O Q
S R E
V
A
U
, V D
E
N
I
E I
R R
S P D T
E
E
A
E C S
D L
R T E W
L W
H T W
C
I E O L
IT
E
O
L W B
H
R
R
B U
I
N .
N P
E I O L
O
O
C
C D N
R
F
O
O I L N
A
S Y
R
O
T
G O
P
R S
E
. U
O
E D L
P
T
R
R O I
A
N H
A
V C
R
A E
T
I A C
K
T R
E
T E E N
)
I
P
D O L
A
P N I W N
R
IN S E
K
IT E O S H
H
S F
AS
(
1S
E
T
N
F
M
FL=
A 429 I ' N
TR
Y
EW)
V
RIO -
D-
O
L
0'
R
O6
2 0
' L A N AI R
T
B LI
C
1 0 ' S D I S D C E A
B
P E B U
F
( P U
E
A S E M E N T
U IL D IN F
G
E
S
R
E T B 3 0'
U TI
LI T Y
M E
N T
A E
C S
K A
E
Y
T LI
TI
U
0'
3
)
W
/
R
'
0
0
2 L-2
(
SELAS
RO ,ECNAYEVNOC
,NOITADROCER
ROF
TON
-
TALP
YRANIMILERP
NAIDRAUG
SNARETEV
ECIFFO
ETAROPROC
seniP
nrehtuoS
nalP
etiS
kraP
etaroproC
)1 esahP(
REVISIONS
SYM. DESCRIPTION DATE BY
RAB INVESTMENTS
NORTH PARCEL ID #: 00039569
ZONED: PD
RAB INVESTMENTS
PARCEL ID #: 00039569
ZONED: PD
RAB INVESTMENTS
PARCEL ID #: 00039569
ZONED: PD
RAB INVESTMENTS PARCEL ID #: 00039569
ZONED: PD
PRELIMINARY PLAT-FOR REVIEW ONLY
I, JEFFREY L. GREEN, CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAT WAS DRAWN UNDER MY SUPERVISION
FROM A SURVEY MADE UNDER MY SUPERVISION (DEED DESCRIPTION REFERENCES AS
SHOWN); THAT THE BOUNDARIES NOT SURVEYED ARE CLEARLY INDICATED AS DRAWN
FROM INFORMATION FOUND (REFERENCES AS SHOWN; THAT THE RATIO OF PRECISION
AS CALCULATED IS 1:10,000+; THAT THIS PLAT WAS NOT PREPARED IN ACCORDANCE
WITH G.S. 47-30 AS AMENDED. WITNESS MY ORIGINAL SIGNATURE, LICENSE NUMBER
AND SEAL THIS ________ DAY OF _________, A.D., 2020.
BUTTERNUT HICKORY, LLC
PARCEL ID #: 20150334
WM KING & ANNIE MCKINEY
ZONED: PD
PARCEL ID #: 00035384
ZONED: PD PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR
3972
LICENSE NUMBER DATE:
DESIGNED:
DRAWN:
PRELIMINARY PLAT NOTES:
CHECKED: PRELIMINARY PLAT PREPARED BY LKC ENGINEERING, PLLC, JEFFERY L. GREEN, PLS, #L-3972
NO.
cllp
,gnireenignE
CKL
truoC
dehS
auqA
041
(cid:74)(cid:81)(cid:76)(cid:85)(cid:72)(cid:72)(cid:81)(cid:76)(cid:74)(cid:81)E
51382
CN
,needrebA
7341.024.019
:O
(cid:72)(cid:85)(cid:88)(cid:87)(cid:70)(cid:72)(cid:87)(cid:76)(cid:75)(cid:70)(cid:85)A
(cid:72)(cid:83)(cid:68)(cid:70)(cid:86)(cid:71)(cid:81)(cid:68)L
6900.736.019
:F
(cid:74)(cid:81)(cid:76)(cid:92)(cid:72)(cid:89)(cid:85)(cid:88)S
moc.gnireenigneckl 5901-P
.oN
esneciL
BAT PROPERTIES LLC
140 AQUA SHED CT
ABERDEEN, NC, 28315
PARCEL ID #: 20200432
DEED BOOK: 5378, PAGE: 343
LOT #7
(RECOMBINATION)
8.68 ACRES
Page 31 of 32

[PAGE 32]
SOUTHERN PINES COURTESY REVIEW
Project: PD-03-25
Location: West side of Air Tool Drive between Yadkin Rd. and US Highway 1
PIN#: 858200940151 and 858200844641
August 28, 2025
Following a review of the above referenced application by the RLUAC Land Use
Committee, it has been determined that:
• The site is designated as Important to Protect in the Fort Bragg Compatible Use
Rating system due to its location within a designated High Quality Waters drainage
area (Mill Creek HQW Management Area).
RLUAC encourages the Town of Southern Pines and the owner / developer to take
such measures as are feasible to limit the impact of stormwater runoff from the
future development of the site on McDeeds Creek (a tributary of Mill Creek) and
the Mill Creek High Quality Waters Management Area.
Maintaining the integrity of important environmental assets contributes to the
overall compatibility of our region with Fort Bragg’s environmental protection
mission, which goes hand-in-hand with its military training and operational missions.
Beyond the potential environmental impact of the proposed development, the
nature of the use proposed for the site does not present any compatibility
concerns with regard to military training or operations.
While RLUAC’s findings and recommendations are non-binding on the Town of Southern
Pines, their consideration and incorporation into your review of this case will help to
improve compatibility outcomes for our region as a whole by protecting Fort Bragg’s
military training and operational missions.
Thank you for providing the opportunity for RLUAC to review this case.
Hon. Kia Anthony, Chairwoman
Fort Bragg Regional Land Use Advisory Commission
Vagn K. Hansen II, AICP, Executive Director
Fort Bragg Regional Land Use Advisory Commission
6205 Raeford Road Fayetteville, NC 28304 | 910.398.3743 | director@rluac.com
Page 32 of 32