[PAGE 1]
MINNEHAHA COUNTY
PLANNING COMMISSION FEBRUARY 23, 2026
MEETING MINUTES
MINUTES OF THE
MINNEHAHA COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
February 23, 2026
A meeting of the Planning Commission was held on February 23, 2026, at 7:00 p.m. in the
Commission Room of the Minnehaha County Administration Building.
COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MEMBERS PRESENT: Commissioners Bonnie Duffy,
Becky Randall, Adam Mohrhauser, Mike Ralston, Cindy Heiberger and Joe Kippley.
STAFF PRESENT:
Scott Anderson, Kevin Hoekman and Mason Steffen – County Planning
Maggie Gillespie – States Attorney’s Office
Bonnie Duffy chaired the meeting and called the Minnehaha County Planning Commission meeting
to order at 7:05 p.m.
PUBLIC COMMENT.
Commissioner Duffy opened the floor for public comment, and nobody moved to speak.
Consent Agenda
Commissioner Duffy read each item on the consent agenda, and no items were requested to be
moved to the regular agenda.
A motion was made to approve the consent agenda consisting of Items 1, 2 & 3 by Commissioner
Ralston and seconded by Commissioner Mohrhauser. The motion passed unanimously
with 5 votes in favor of the motion and 0 votes against the motion.
ITEM 1. Approval of Minutes – January 26, 2026
As part of the consent agenda, a motion was made by Commissioner Ralston and seconded by
Commissioner Mohrhauser to approve the meeting minutes from January 26, 2026. The motion
passed unanimously with 5 votes in favor of the motion and 0 votes against the motion.
Page
1

[PAGE 2]
MINNEHAHA COUNTY
PLANNING COMMISSION FEBRUARY 23, 2026
MEETING MINUTES
Consent Agenda
ITEM 2. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT #26-08 to allow an Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU)
on the property legally described as Tract 1 Stahl Addition NW¼ Section 17
T101N-R52W Wellington Township.
Petitioner: Bennett Stahl
Property Owner: Same
Location: 26446 455th Avenue
Staff Report: Mason Steffen
General Information:
Legal Description – Tract 1 Stahl Addition NW¼ Section 17 T101N-R52W
Wellington Township
Present Zoning – A1 Agricultural
Existing Land Use – Residential Acreage
Parcel Size – 14.30 Acres
Staff Report: Mason Steffen
Staff Analysis: The petitioner is requesting conditional use permit approval to allow a detached
accessory dwelling unit (ADU) on the subject property. The property is a large residential acreage
with several detached accessory buildings, including a 56’ x 80’ shop building that was constructed
in 2023. The intent is for the petitioner to finish 1,600 square feet within this building into habitable
space and leave the remaining portion of the building as garage space. This accessory building
would then become the primary dwelling on the property, and the smaller farm house would be the
ADU. An ADU must be approved by a conditional use permit, prior to the issuance of a building
permit for the conversion of the shop building into a dwelling.
The general requirements for an ADU are the following:
1) The ADU must be accessory to a primary dwelling, and the primary dwelling and ADU
must be located together on one platted lot.
This request will convert an existing shop into the primary dwelling, and the existing farm
house will become the ADU. The new primary dwelling is proposed to have 1,600 square
feet of finished space. The existing farm house is listed to have 1,020 square feet of finished
space based on records from the Equalization Office. Therefore, since the new primary
dwelling will have more finished space than the existing farm house that is to be used as the
ADU, the request meets the ADU size requirements.
2) Only one ADU is allowed per parcel where zoning allows.
The subject property is entirely zoned A-1 Agricultural, which allows ADUs as a conditional
use. No additional ADUs will be allowed on the property if this request is approved.
3) The ADU must be built on permanent frost protective footings.
Based on building inspection records, the shop building was built on a frost protected
footing. However, since a portion of the building will now be converted into habitable space
Page
2

[PAGE 3]
MINNEHAHA COUNTY
PLANNING COMMISSION FEBRUARY 23, 2026
MEETING MINUTES
adjacent to garage space, there are additional foundation and fire wall requirements that
will need to be inspected and approved by the Chief Building Inspector.
4) The parcel must be able to handle additional wastewater potential for the ADU. Proof of
capacity of wastewater compliance must be provided before approval of any conditional use
permit.
The on-site wastewater system for the existing farm house on the property was replaced in
2018. The petitioner will be required to submit a design for a separate on-site wastewater
system for the shop building/new primary dwelling, prior to the issuance of a building
permit.
5) No additional access from a township, county, or state highway may be constructed for
separate use of the ADU.
The primary dwelling and ADU will continue to utilize the existing access point off 455th
Avenue. No additional access will be allowed for separate use by the ADU at any time.
6) Two additional off-street parking spaces must be provided for the ADU.
The existing farm house has a detached garage for off-street parking, and the new primary
dwelling will have a large, attached garage space. The subject property also has many
driveway areas that provide additional off-street parking for both structures.
7) If the ADU is located within a regulated floodplain, then the lowest floor of the ADU must
be elevated at or above the base flood elevation.
No portion of the subject property is located within the regulated 100-year floodplain.
8) No ADU can be located within the regulated floodway.
No portion of the subject property is located within the regulated floodway.
9) The ADU must comply with all other county ordinances.
The property currently complies with all the relevant county ordinances including the public
nuisance ordinance.
Conditional Use Permit Criteria:
1) The effect upon the use and enjoyment of other property in the immediate vicinity for the
uses already permitted, and upon property values in the immediate vicinity.
The property is located in the active agricultural production area of the county. The surrounding
area is almost entirely cropland and there is an indoor Class C Hog Concentrated Feeding Operation
(CAFO) just over a half mile to the southwest of the property. The proposed ADU will increase the
number of families that can live on the property, which may create potential conflict with
neighboring agricultural land uses. New housing within the A-1 Agricultural zoning district
typically requires that a right-to-farm notice covenant be filed on the deed, prior to issuing a
building permit. Therefore, staff recommends that a right-to-farm notice covenant be required as
part of the approval of this conditional use permit.
Page
3

[PAGE 4]
MINNEHAHA COUNTY
PLANNING COMMISSION FEBRUARY 23, 2026
MEETING MINUTES
2) The effect upon the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding
vacant property for uses predominant in the area.
The property is located in the agricultural production area several miles from any municipality or
large residential developments. The predominant land use for the vacant properties will remain
cropland and large scale agricultural operations for the foreseeable future. There is an existing
indoor hog CAFO in close proximity to the southwest of the property. However, the proposed
primary dwelling and ADU on the existing acreage will not encroach on the necessary setbacks for
this Class C CAFO.
3) That utilities, access roads, drainage and/or other necessary facilities are provided.
The property is already developed with a farm house and accessory buildings that utilize an existing
access point off 455th Avenue. The petitioner will be required to extend any necessary utilities to the
shop building in order to meet the minimum requirements for a dwelling. The applicant will also
need to install an on-site wastewater treatment system for the new primary dwelling and meet all
requirements of the On-Site Wastewater ordinance. Obtaining the percolation test and designing the
system will be required prior to issuing the building permit for the conversion of the shop building
into a dwelling. The conversion of the existing accessory building into the primary dwelling will not
impact drainage on the property, or surrounding area.
4) That the off-street parking and loading requirements are met.
Both dwellings will have dedicated garage space that will provide the necessary off-street parking.
The property is also large enough to accommodate any additional off-street parking that is
necessary.
5) That measures are taken to control offensive odor, fumes, dust, noise, vibration, and
lighting (inclusive of lighted signs), so that none of these will constitute a nuisance.
The conversion of an existing structure into a primary dwelling and use of an old farm house as an
ADU will not create any odor, fumes, dust, noise, vibration, or lighting nuisances to the surrounding
properties. The ADU and subject property will be required to adhere to the public nuisance
ordinance for Minnehaha County.
6) Health, safety, general welfare of the public and the Comprehensive Plan.
The proposed ADU will have no anticipated effects on the health, safety and general welfare of the
public. Allowing this ADU on an existing acreage will allow for additional residential density
without converting farmland into non-agricultural uses, which follows the intent of the recently
adopted ordinance amendments and Envision 2045 Comprehensive Plan.
Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of Conditional Use Permit #26-08 with the
following conditions:
1) That no more than one ADU shall be allowed on the property.
2) That only one access point off the public right-of-way shall be allowed for use by both the
primary dwelling and ADU.
3) That two additional off-street parking spaces shall be provided for the ADU.
Page
4

[PAGE 5]
MINNEHAHA COUNTY
PLANNING COMMISSION FEBRUARY 23, 2026
MEETING MINUTES
4) That a building permit shall be obtained for the conversion of the accessory building into the
new primary dwelling.
5) That an on-site wastewater permit shall be obtained, prior to the issuance of a building
permit for the conversion of the accessory building into the new primary dwelling.
6) That a right-to-farm notice covenant shall be filed on the deed, prior to the issuance of a
building permit for the conversion of the accessory building into the new primary dwelling.
7) That a separate address sign shall be purchased through the Minnehaha County Planning
Department and installed at the driveway. Address numbers shall be placed on the exterior
of each dwelling. The size and location of the address numbers shall meet the requirements
of the Rural Addressing Ordinance.
8) That any new or replacement outdoor lighting shall be of a full cutoff and fully shielded
design to prevent direct spillage of light beyond the property boundaries.
9) That the Minnehaha County Planning Department reserves the right to enter and inspect the
site at any time, after proper notice of the owner, to ensure that the property is in full
compliance with the conditional use permit conditions of approval and the Minnehaha
County Zoning Ordinance.
Action
As part of the consent agenda, a motion was made by Commissioner Ralston and seconded by
Commissioner Mohrhauser to approve Conditional Use Permit #26-08 with the staff recommended
conditions. The motion passed unanimously with 5 votes in favor of the motion and 0 votes against
the motion.
Conditional Use Permit #26-08 – Approved
Page
5

[PAGE 6]
MINNEHAHA COUNTY
PLANNING COMMISSION FEBRUARY 23, 2026
MEETING MINUTES
ITEM 3. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT #26-09 to allow an Electrical Substation on the
property legally described as Tract 1 Hildring Addition SW¼ Section 24 T101N-
R48W Split Rock Township.
Petitioner: East River Electric Power Coop., Inc.
Property Owner: Same
Location: 48310 266th Street
Staff Report: Mason Steffen
General Information:
Legal Description – Tract 1 Hildring Addition SW¼ Section 24 T101N-R48W
Split Rock Township
Present Zoning – A1 Agricultural
Existing Land Use – Vacant Lot
Parcel Size – 10.52 Acres
Staff Report: Mason Steffen
Staff Analysis: This conditional use permit is a continuation of a previously approved permit
from 2011. On April 19, 2011, East River Electric was approved by the Minnehaha County
Commission for a conditional use permit to allow an electrical substation on the property. This
permit was approved with ten conditions including the following condition:
6) The applicant shall follow the proposed construction phases of the electrical
substation as submitted to the Minnehaha County Planning Department dated January
19, 2011.
The four construction phases submitted with the original permit were to be completed within
six years of the approval of the permit. Since they were not completed within this timeframe, a
new conditional use permit is required before construction can continue on the site. The design
of the site will be for a 115 kV transmission switching station and the narrative explains that
three electrical lines intersect at the site. The petitioner has planted screening trees around the
property, graded and laid crushed asphalt, removed the driveway onto County Highway 146
(266th Street), and constructed a new driveway onto 483rd Avenue. They are now requesting to
renew the conditional use permit in order to begin the construction of the substation
components and control building. Finally, since the access point for the site was moved from
266th Street to 483rd Avenue, the physical address will need to be updated to reflect this
change, and a new rural address sign will need to be purchased from the Minnehaha County
Planning Department.
On February 6, 2026, staff conducted a site visit to the subject property and surrounding area.
All of the screening trees that were planted after the conditional use permit in 2011 appeared to
be in a live state and a majority of them have matured to over twenty feet tall. The properties
directly to the north, south, and east are all currently used as cropland. Finally, there is an
existing residential acreage directly to the west across 483rd Avenue and this property also has
a dense tree line between the dwelling and proposed substation.
Page
6

[PAGE 7]
MINNEHAHA COUNTY
PLANNING COMMISSION FEBRUARY 23, 2026
MEETING MINUTES
Conditional Use Permit Criteria:
1) The effect upon the use and enjoyment of other property in the immediate vicinity for the
uses already permitted, and upon property values in the immediate vicinity.
There are a few residential acreages within a 1,000 feet of the proposed site, but there is only one
acreage directly adjacent to the west of the site. The remaining adjacent land to the north, south and
east is agricultural cropland. The property is also surrounded by mature trees that provide a visual
buffer to the neighboring properties. The petitioner has also submitted a yard lighting analysis that
will minimize glare and other lighting nuisances from impacting the neighboring properties. Given
that the site was approved for an electrical substation fifteen years ago, and that a majority of the
site work has already been completed, allowing the construction of the substation components and
control building should minimally impact the neighboring properties.
2) The effect upon the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding
vacant property for uses predominant in the area.
Due to the existing residential development pattern and agricultural uses within the area, the
proposed electrical substation should not have a negative effect upon the normal and orderly
development and improvement of these properties. The electrical substation will also insure
adequate electric services to present and future development in the area and to the county as a
whole.
3) That utilities, access roads, drainage and/or other necessary facilities are provided.
The petitioner has removed the access point onto 266th Street and the only access to the site will be
off 483rd Avenue. Due to this access point change, the petitioner will be required to update the
physical address and purchase a new rural address sign. The submitted plans indicate that the site
will utilize natural drainage and a condition will be placed on the permit requiring that all existing
drainage ways be maintained.
4) That the off-street parking and loading requirements are met.
Article 15.00 of the zoning ordinance does not specifically identify any parking requirements for
substations, but this land use typically does not generate significant amounts of traffic. Staff
recommends that a minimum of two (2) off-street parking spaces be provided. Each parking space
should measure a minimum of nine (9) feet by eighteen (18) feet and be continually maintained.
5) That measures are taken to control offensive odor, fumes, dust, noise, vibration, and
lighting (inclusive of lighted signs), so that none of these will constitute a nuisance.
The proposed substation should produce limited odor, fumes, dust, and vibrations to the
surrounding area. The fact that the site is already surrounded by mature trees will also help limit
potential nuisances. One concern with this type of land use is lights illuminating beyond the
boundaries of the site. The petitioner has submitted a yard lighting analysis and explained that the
site will not be continually lighted. All lighting on the property will still be required to be of a fully
cutoff and fully shielded design. Finally, noise from the substation could also be a nuisance to
neighboring properties but given the location along a county highway and lack of many direct
residential neighbors, the noise from the site should not overly disturb the neighboring land uses.
Page
7

[PAGE 8]
MINNEHAHA COUNTY
PLANNING COMMISSION FEBRUARY 23, 2026
MEETING MINUTES
6) Health, safety, general welfare of the public and the Comprehensive Plan.
Providing safe and reliable infrastructure is vital to the general welfare of the public. The electrical
substation will provide a benefit to the community, and with appropriate conditions of approval, any
concerns can be mitigated. Many of the goals included within the Envision 2045 Comprehensive
Plan encourage the county to plan for population growth and more residential development within
the county. Allowing East River Electric to complete the construction of this substation will better
prepare them for future electrical demands and continue to provide services to existing customers.
Recommendation: Staff recommends approval of Conditional Use Permit #26-09 with the
following conditions:
1) That the substation shall be entirely enclosed in a minimum eight (8) foot high fence,
gated and locked.
2) That a minimum of two (2) off-street parking spaces (minimum of 9' x 18' in size) shall
be provided and no parking shall be allowed in the public right-of-way at any time.
3) That all existing drainage ways shall be maintained and that erosion control measures be
implemented on all disturbed areas so as not to allow any sedimentation of existing
drainage ways or bodies of water.
4) That the site shall adhere to the site plan submitted to the Minnehaha County Planning
Department on January 23, 2026. All landscaping shall be maintained in a live state, and
all noxious weeds shall be controlled.
5) That the applicant shall obtain a building permit prior to any construction commencing
on the site.
6) That a sign permit shall be obtained prior to the installation of any sign.
7) That a new rural address sign shall be purchased from the Minnehaha County Planning
Department to reflect the change in access points for the site, prior to construction.
8) That the applicant obtains and keeps current any required S.D. Public Utilities permits
and meet all noise standards set by the Public Utilities Commission.
9) That the Minnehaha County Planning Department reserves the right to enter and inspect
the premises, after proper notice to the owner, to ensure that the property is in full
compliance with the conditional use permit conditions of approval and the Minnehaha
County Zoning Ordinance.
Action
As part of the consent agenda, a motion was made by Commissioner Ralston and seconded by
Commissioner Mohrhauser to approve Conditional Use Permit #26-09 with the staff recommended
conditions. The motion passed unanimously with 5 votes in favor of the motion and 0 votes against
the motion.
Conditional Use Permit #26-09 – Approved
Page
8

[PAGE 9]
MINNEHAHA COUNTY
PLANNING COMMISSION FEBRUARY 23, 2026
MEETING MINUTES
Regular Agenda
ITEM 4. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT #26-07 to allow an Agricultural Related Operation
(Portable Building Sales) on the properties legally described as Tract 4C & Tract
4D Meyer’s Addition NW¼ Section 15 T103N-R52W Clear Lake Township.
Petitioner: Brian Jones
Property Owner: Same
Location: 45721 252nd Street
Staff Report: Kevin Hoekman
General Information:
Legal Description – Tract 4C & Tract 4D Meyer’s Addition NW¼ Section 15
T103N-R52W Clear Lake Township
Present Zoning – A1 Agricultural
Existing Land Use – Residential Acreage
Parcel Size – 6.50 Acres
Staff Report: Kevin Hoekman
Staff Analysis:
The applicant is requesting to use a portion of his two parcels to display and sell portable buildings
and sheds. The petitioner indicates within the application and submitted narrative that the proposed
shed display and sale is an agriculturally related operation. An agriculturally related operation
involving the handling, storage and shipping of farm products requires a conditional use permit
approval within the A1 Agricultural zoning district.
The petitioner submitted a narrative and site plan for the proposed sale of portable buildings. The
land use will take place on two lots. The primary display will take place on a vacant acreage site,
and access will utilize the existing driveway for the residential property. The vacant property does
not have a driveway access to the township road at this time. No mention is made in the narrative
regarding where the sheds are being built. This application is only for the display and sale of sheds
as agricultural products. If approved, production of the sheds would not be allowed on the
properties.
The sale of portable buildings typically placed into commercial or industrial zoned land. The
display and sale of portable sheds are not specifically listed within the land uses permitted within
the A1-Agriculutral Zoning District. The desired use most closely resembles an agriculturally
related operation involving the handling, storage and shipping of farm products. Portable sheds and
building are certainly used for agricultural purposes, however portable shed are often used by and
for non-agricultural purposes as well. Staff finds the proposed land use too closely related to retail
commercial land uses to recommend approval on an agriculturally zoned parcel.
Conditional Use Permit Criteria:
Page
9

[PAGE 10]
MINNEHAHA COUNTY
PLANNING COMMISSION FEBRUARY 23, 2026
MEETING MINUTES
1) The effect upon the use and enjoyment of other property in the immediate vicinity for the
uses already permitted, and upon property values in the immediate vicinity.
The proposed shed display and sales will change the character of the area. The property is located
within a strip of platted lots within an agricultural development area. Two houses exist in the
development, including the petitioner’s house. And two lots are currently vacant, including the
petitioner’s lot that will have the displayed sheds. The proposed land use will change the area even
if the changes are proposed to be minimal.
The proposed land use will be highly visible and clearly commercial in nature. The stated hours of
operation are from 8:00 am to 8:00 pm every day. The petitioner also states in the narrative that
there will be one to two customers per day and a maximum of two employees. The added customers
and traffic of trucks to transport the sheds will have an impact on the current property in the area.
2) The effect upon the normal and orderly development and improvement of surrounding
vacant property for uses predominant in the area.
The surrounding area is currently agricultural with several residential properties and vacant lots.
The character of the area will likely remain agricultural for the foreseeable future. The proposed
commercial like business will be a contrast to current and future development. Approval of this
commercial like business also may lead to similar requests in the area and throughout the county.
3) That utilities, access roads, drainage and/or other necessary facilities are provided.
The proposed land use will not require the extension of any utilities. Neither will is significantly
change drainage of the site. The property is accessed from an existing residential driveway onto a
gravel township road. Additional truck and customer traffic on the gravel road will result in
additional dust and wear on the road.
4) That the off-street parking and loading requirements are met.
The narrative explains that there are 10 available parking spaces just off the primary driveway.
There is no description for driving surface or what the ground surface will be for the display area.
There is no ordinance requirement for hard surfacing parking or display for ag related operations.
5) That measures are taken to control offensive odor, fumes, dust, noise, vibration, and
lighting (inclusive of lighted signs), so that none of these will constitute a nuisance.
The proposed shed display and sales should not create odor, fumes, noise, or vibration. Additional
traffic on a gravel road may increase dust to and from the driveway entrance. There are no plans
submitted for lighting, and it is presumed no specific lighting would be used for the proposed
display.
6) Health, safety, general welfare of the public and the Comprehensive Plan.
Planning staff has concerns regarding the commercial nature of the proposed land use. First, the
requested shed sales is a retail operation is that generally not allowed by other portions of the
zoning ordinance on a residential used property. Retail is not even allowed within a home
occupation. Elsewhere in the county, similar shed display and sales operations were placed on
commercial parcels with conditional use permit approvals.
Page
10

[PAGE 11]
MINNEHAHA COUNTY
PLANNING COMMISSION FEBRUARY 23, 2026
MEETING MINUTES
Second, permitting this land use may lead to copy cat operations elsewhere in agriculturally zoned
property. Staff finds that designating this as agricultural may lead to other indirectly related
operations using the ‘agriculturally related operation’ as a way to obtain approval.
The proposed operation is located on a gravel road approximately 1,000 feet from SD Highway 19.
Customers and trucks will need to access the property from a gravel township road. Action 4 of
Goal 4.9 of the Envision 2045 Comprehensive Plan action is to “locate commercial uses at interstate
highway interchanges and high traffic intersections to support highway users.” This commercial use
is not located along a highway or high traffic area. Staff suggests that there are more appropriate
opportunities to have display locations in currently commercial zoned property both in the rural area
and in nearby municipalities.
Recommendation: Staff recommends denial of Conditional Use Permit #26-07.
Public Testimony
Kevin Hoekman, of county planning staff, presented the staff report and recommendation to the
commission.
Commissioner Mohrhauser asked if the petitioner owns both properties included in the request and
if they have building eligibilities. Kevin confirmed that Brian Jones owns both properties and that
they each have one building eligibility.
The petitioner, Brian Jones, was present and available for questions from the commission. Mr.
Jones explained the nature and purpose of the business and addressed the concerns raised by
planning staff. Mr. Jones stated that he does not manufacture the buildings on the property, or at any
other location, and that he uses his truck and trailer to haul used, unwanted sheds off of other
properties. These sheds are then stored on the subject property and sold on an individual basis via
Facebook Marketplace and similar websites. Mr. Jones also explained that the sheds are typically
small sheds, and that he does not plan on having more than five sheds on the property at a time.
Commissioner Heiberger asked the petitioner what type of buildings would typically be stored on
the property and if storing five sheds at a time is necessary. Mr. Jones explained that the typical
building he moves are garden sheds, kennels, and calf sheds. He further explained that five sheds at
a time is less than what commercial dealers have on-site, so he thinks that number is reasonable for
this request.
Commissioner Heiberger then asked if the petitioner has already begun operating the business, and
if so, how long will the sheds typically stay on site. Mr. Jones stated that he has just started the
business and explained that that is why he is requesting the permit, in order to be compliant with the
county’s ordinances.
Commissioner Heiberger asked the petitioner if there is a size limit on what they can haul with their
trailer. Mr. Jones explained that the widest building he can haul is fourteen feet and the longest
building he can haul is thirty-two feet, which he explained is the size of a typical single-stall garage.
Mr. Jones further stated that his typical client is someone who is moving to a new property that does
Page
11

[PAGE 12]
MINNEHAHA COUNTY
PLANNING COMMISSION FEBRUARY 23, 2026
MEETING MINUTES
not have a shed, and moving an existing shed from their property or some else’s property is cheaper
than buying a new shed.
Discussion
Commissioner Kippley explained that after hearing from the petitioner the operation sounds less
commercial in nature then when he was reading the staff report. Commissioner Kippley also
commented that he thinks there is a way to approve the permit that is limited in scope, as long as it
is approved with the right conditions.
Scott Anderson, the County Planning Director, explained that if the commission is inclined to
approve the request then he would recommend that they defer the request to next months meeting,
so that staff can work on proposed conditions.
Commissioner Heiberger stated that she would be in favor of deferring the item because she sees
this request as different from a commercial use. Commissioner Heiberger also suggested that maybe
there could be conditions requiring that the buildings stored on the property be used buildings or
potentially having a size and number limit on the buildings.
Commissioner Kippley stated that the applicant appears to be willing to work with staff on proposed
conditions and that he believes they can narrowly tailor the request to the applicant’s situation in
order to not create a precedent.
Action
A motion was made by Commissioner Kippley and seconded by Commissioner Ralston to defer
Conditional Use Permit #26-07 to the March 23, 2026, meeting. The motion passed unanimously
with 5 votes in favor and 0 votes against the motion.
Conditional Use Permit #26-07 – Deferred to the March 23, 2026, Meeting
Page
12

[PAGE 13]
MINNEHAHA COUNTY
PLANNING COMMISSION FEBRUARY 23, 2026
MEETING MINUTES
Old Business
None.
New Business
Kevin Hoekman, of county planning staff, presented a brief overview of the proposed ordinance
amendments that staff has been preparing for the commission. Kevin explained that staff is
requesting that these ordinance amendments be heard by the Planning Commission at the March 23,
2026, meeting. Therefore, planning staff requested that the commission authorize staff to publish
notice a hearings in the county newspapers for these public hearings:
A. A motion was made by Commissioner Randall and seconded by Commissioner
Heiberger to authorize a public hearing for Ordinance Amendments #26-01, 26-04
& 26-06 at the March 23, 2026, meeting. The motion passed unanimously with 5
votes in favor and 0 votes against the motion.
B. A motion was made by Commissioner Randall and seconded by Commissioner
Ralston to authorize a public hearing for Ordinance Amendment #26-02 at the
March 23, 2026, meeting. The motion passed unanimously with 5 votes in favor and
0 votes against the motion.
C. A motion was made by Commissioner Randall and seconded by Commissioner
Mohrhauser to authorize a public hearing for Ordinance Amendment #26-03 at the
March 23, 2026, meeting. The motion passed unanimously with 5 votes in favor and
0 votes against the motion.
D. A motion was made by Commissioner Randall and seconded by Commissioner
Heiberger to authorize a public hearing for Ordinance Amendment #26-05 at the
March 23, 2026, meeting. The motion passed unanimously with 5 votes in favor and
0 votes against the motion.
Adjourn
A motion was made to adjourn by Commissioner Heiberger and seconded by Commissioner
Kippley. The motion was approved unanimously. The meeting was adjourned at 7:36 p.m.
Page
13